Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom–Africa capacity strengthening award scheme

Authors: Laura Dean, Janet Njelesani, Helen Smith, Imelda Bates

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Research partnerships between high-income countries (HICs) and low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) are a leading model in research capacity strengthening activities. Although numerous frameworks and guiding principles for effective research partnerships exist, few include the perspective of the LMIC partner. This paper draws out lessons for establishing and maintaining successful research collaborations, based on partnership dynamics, from the perspectives of both HIC and LMIC stakeholders through the evaluation of a research capacity strengthening partnership award scheme.

Methods

A mixed-method retrospective evaluation approach was used. Initially, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all award holders, which focused on partnership outputs and continuation. Fifty individuals were purposively selected to participate in interviews or focus group discussions from 12 different institutions in HICs and LMICs; the sample included the research investigators, research assistants, laboratory scientists and post-doctoral students. The evaluation collected data on critical elements of research partnership dynamics such as research outputs, nature of the partnership, future plans and research capacity. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data were analysed using an iterative framework approach.

Results

The majority of United Kingdom and African award holders stated they would like to pursue future collaborations together. Key aspects within partnerships that appeared to influence this were; the perceived benefits of the partnership at the individual and institutional level such as publication of papers or collaborative grants; ability to influence ‘research culture’ and instigate critical thinking among mid-career researchers; previous working relationships, for example supervisor-student relationships; and equity within partnerships linked to partnership formation and experience of United Kingdom partners within LMICs. Factors which may hinder development of long term partnerships were also identified such as financial control or differing expectations of partners.

Conclusions

This paper provides evidence of what encourages international research partnerships for capacity strengthening to continue past award tenure, from the perspective of researchers in high and LMICs. Although every partnership is unique and individual experiences subjective, this paper provides extension and support of key principles and mechanisms that can contribute to successful research partnerships between researchers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:276.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:276.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Cole D, Boyd A, Aslanyan G, Bates I. Indicators for tracking programmes to strengthen health research capacity in lower and middle income countries: a qualitative synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:13.CrossRef Cole D, Boyd A, Aslanyan G, Bates I. Indicators for tracking programmes to strengthen health research capacity in lower and middle income countries: a qualitative synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:13.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mayhew S, Doherty J, Pitayarangsarit S. Developing health systems research capacities through north–south partnership: an evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008;6:8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mayhew S, Doherty J, Pitayarangsarit S. Developing health systems research capacities through north–south partnership: an evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008;6:8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Syed S, Dadwal V, Rutter P, Storr J, Hightower J, Gooden R, et al. Developed- developing country partnerships: benefits to developed countries? Global Health. 2012;8:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Syed S, Dadwal V, Rutter P, Storr J, Hightower J, Gooden R, et al. Developed- developing country partnerships: benefits to developed countries? Global Health. 2012;8:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Airhihenbuwa C, Shisana O, Zungu N, BeLue R, Makofani D, Shefer T, et al. Research capacity building: A US-South African partnership. Glob Health Promot. 2011;18:35–94.CrossRef Airhihenbuwa C, Shisana O, Zungu N, BeLue R, Makofani D, Shefer T, et al. Research capacity building: A US-South African partnership. Glob Health Promot. 2011;18:35–94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference de-Graft Aikins A, Arhinful D, Pitchforth E, Ogedegbe G, Allotey P, Agyemang C. Establishing and sustaining research partnerships in Africa: A case study of the UK-Africa Academic Partnership on Chronic Disease. Global Health. 2012;8:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de-Graft Aikins A, Arhinful D, Pitchforth E, Ogedegbe G, Allotey P, Agyemang C. Establishing and sustaining research partnerships in Africa: A case study of the UK-Africa Academic Partnership on Chronic Disease. Global Health. 2012;8:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Njelesani J, Stevens M, Cleaver S, Mwambwa L, Nixon S. International research partnerships in occupational therapy: A Canadian-Zambian case study. Occup Ther Int. 2013;20(2):78–87.CrossRefPubMed Njelesani J, Stevens M, Cleaver S, Mwambwa L, Nixon S. International research partnerships in occupational therapy: A Canadian-Zambian case study. Occup Ther Int. 2013;20(2):78–87.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Bradley M. On the agenda: North–South research partnerships and agenda-setting processes. Develop Practice. 2008;18:673–85.CrossRef Bradley M. On the agenda: North–South research partnerships and agenda-setting processes. Develop Practice. 2008;18:673–85.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ovretveit J. Evaluating Health Interventions. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003. Ovretveit J. Evaluating Health Interventions. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003.
14.
go back to reference Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley; 2000. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley; 2000.
15.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage Publications; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
16.
go back to reference Afsana K, Habte D, Hatfield J, Murphy J, Neufeld V. Partnership Assessment Toolkit. Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research. 2009. http://www.ccghr.ca/resources/partnerships-and-networking/partnership-assessment-tool/. Accessed 5 May 2015. Afsana K, Habte D, Hatfield J, Murphy J, Neufeld V. Partnership Assessment Toolkit. Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research. 2009. http://​www.​ccghr.​ca/​resources/​partnerships-and-networking/​partnership-assessment-tool/​.​ Accessed 5 May 2015.
17.
go back to reference IRC. North–South research partnerships: Issues and challenges Trivandrum expert meeting report 1999. The Hague: Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council; 2001. IRC. North–South research partnerships: Issues and challenges Trivandrum expert meeting report 1999. The Hague: Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council; 2001.
18.
go back to reference Pryor J, Kuupole A, Kutor N, Dunne M, Adu-Yeboah C. Exploring the fault lines of cross-cultural collaborative research. Compare. 2009;39:769–82. Pryor J, Kuupole A, Kutor N, Dunne M, Adu-Yeboah C. Exploring the fault lines of cross-cultural collaborative research. Compare. 2009;39:769–82.
19.
go back to reference Baud I. North–South partnerships in development research: an institutional approach. Int J Technol Manage Sustainable Dev. 2002;1:153–70.CrossRef Baud I. North–South partnerships in development research: an institutional approach. Int J Technol Manage Sustainable Dev. 2002;1:153–70.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sawyerr A. African universities and the challenge of research capacity development. J Higher Educ in Africa. 2004;2:211–40. Sawyerr A. African universities and the challenge of research capacity development. J Higher Educ in Africa. 2004;2:211–40.
Metadata
Title
Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom–Africa capacity strengthening award scheme
Authors
Laura Dean
Janet Njelesani
Helen Smith
Imelda Bates
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0071-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue