Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Human Resources for Health
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Case study

The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform

Author: Gareth H. Rees

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

While considerable attention has been given to improving health workforce planning practice, few articles focus on the relationship between health workforce governance and health reform. By outlining a sequence of health reforms, we reveal how New Zealand’s health workforce governance and practices came under pressure, leading to a rethink and the introduction of innovative approaches and initiatives.

Case description

New Zealand’s health system was quite stable up to the late 1980s, after which 30 years of structural and system reform was undertaken. This had the effect of replacing the centralised medically led health workforce policy and planning system with a market-driven and short-run employer-led planning approach. The increasing pressures and inconsistencies this approach produced ultimately led to the re-centralisation of some governance functions and brought with it a new vision of how to better prepare for future health needs. While significant gain has been made implementing this new vision, issues remain for achieving more effective innovation diffusion and improved integrated care orientations.

Discussion and evaluation

The case reveals that there was a failure to consider the health workforce in almost all of the reforms. Health and workforce policy became increasingly disconnected at the central and regional levels, leading to fragmentation, duplication and widening gaps. New Zealand’s more recent workforce policy and planning approach has adopted new tools and techniques to overcome these weaknesses that have implications for the workforce and service delivery, workforce governance and planning methodologies. However, further strengthening of workforce governance is required to embed the changes in policy and planning and to improve organisational capabilities to diffuse innovation and respond to evolving roles and team-based models of care.

Conclusion

The case reveals that disconnecting the workforce from reform policy leads to a range of debilitating effects. By addressing how it approaches workforce planning and policy, New Zealand is now better placed to plan for a future of integrated and team-based health care. The case provides cues for other countries considering reform agendas, the most important being to include and consider the health workforce in health reform processes.
Literature
1.
Segal L, Bolton T. Issues facing the future health care workforce: the importance of demand modelling. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6(1):1–12.CrossRef
2.
3.
4.
Tomblin Murphy G, Birch S, MacKenzie A, Bradish S, Rose EA. A synthesis of recent analyses of human resources for health requirements and labour market dynamics in high-income OECD countries. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Amorim Lopes M, Santos Almeida Á, Almada-Lobo B. Handling healthcare workforce planning with care: where do we stand? Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:38.CrossRef
6.
Hastings SE, Armitage GD, Mallinson S, Jackson K, Suter E. Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:479.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
8.
Kaplan AD, Dominis S, Palen JG, Quain EE. Human resource governance: what does governance mean for the health workforce in low-and middle-income countries? Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Gauld R. The theory and practice of integrative health care governance: the case of New Zealand’s alliances. J Integr Care (Brighton). 2017;25(1):61–72.CrossRef
10.
Dieleman M, Shaw DM, Zwanikken P. Improving the implementation of health workforce policies through governance: a review of case studies. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9:10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Gauld R. New Zealand’s post-2008 health system reforms: toward re-centralization of organizational arrangements. Health Policy. 2012;106(2):110–3.PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
Chalmers LM, Ashton T, Tenbensel T. Measuring and managing health system performance: an update from New Zealand. Health Policy. 2017;121(8):831–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Gorman DF. Towards a sustainable and fit-for-purpose health workforce - lessons from New Zealand. Med J Aust. 2012;1(Suppl 3):32–6.CrossRef
15.
Gauld R. New Zealand. In: Gauld R, editor. Comparative health policy in the Pacific. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. p. 200–24.
16.
Gauld R. Revolving doors: New Zealand’s health reforms - the continuing saga. 2nd ed. Health Services Research Centre and Institute of Policy Studies: Wellington; 2009.
17.
Ashton T. Measuring health system performance: a new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand. Health Policy. 2015;119(8):999–1004.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Gauld R. What should governance for integrated care look like? New Zealand’s alliances provide some pointers. Med J Aust. 2014;201(3 Suppl):S67–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Minister of Health. New Zealand Health Strategy: future direction. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2016.
20.
The Advisory Committee on Medical Manpower. Report to the Minister of Health on medical manpower requirements. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 1979.
21.
Health Workforce Advisory Committee. Fit for purpose and practice: a review of the medical workforce in New Zealand. Health Workforce Advisory Committee: Wellington; 2005.
22.
de Raad J-P. Shaping the Health Workforce. Ministry of Health: Wellington; 1998.
23.
Gage JD, Hornblow AR. Development of the New Zealand nursing workforce: historical themes and current challenges. Nursing Inq. 2007;14(4):330–4.CrossRef
24.
Health Workforce Advisory Committee. Care and support in the community setting. Ministry of Health: Wellington; 2006.
25.
NZIER. Ageing New Zealand and health and disability services: demand projections and workforce implications, 2001-2021. A discussion document. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2004.
26.
Gorman DF, Horsburgh M, Abbott M. Review of how the training of the New Zealand Health workforce is planned and funded: a proposal for a reconfiguration of the Clinical Training Agency. Ministry of Health: Wellington; 2009.
27.
Hughes F, Carryer J. Nurse practitioners in New Zealand. Ministry of Health: Wellington; 2002.
28.
Ministry of Health and District Health Boards New Zealand Workforce Group. A career framework for the health workforce in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health and District Health Boards New Zealand; 2007.
29.
Raymont A, Simpson J. Projections of surgical need in New Zealand: estimates of the need for surgery and surgeons to 2026. N Z Med J. 2008;121(1275):11–8.PubMed
30.
Ministry of Health. Health workforce development: an overview. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2006.
31.
Workforce Taskforce. Reshaping medical education and training to meet the challenges of the 21st century: a report to the Ministers of Health and for Tertiary Education from the Workforce Taskforce. Ministry of Health: Wellington; 2007.
32.
Medical Training Board. Collation of discussion papers released on 30 September 2008. Wellington: Medical Training Board; 2008.
33.
Medical Training Board. The future of the medical workforce: First Annual Report Nov 2007–Dec 2008. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2009.
34.
Ministry of Health. The role of Health Workforce New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2014.
35.
36.
Fraher E, Brandt B. Toward a system where workforce planning and interprofessional practice and education are designed around patients and populations not professions. J Interprof Care. 2019:1–9.
37.
Ministry of Health. Heath workforce New Zealand: Annual Report to the Minister of Health 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2017.
38.
39.
Ministry of Health. Health of the health workforce 2013 - 2014. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2014.
40.
Ministry of Health. Health of the health workforce 2015. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2016.
41.
42.
43.
Gorman DF, Brooks PM. On solutions to the shortage of doctors in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust. 2009;190(3):152–6.PubMed
44.
Rees GH, Crampton P, Gauld R, MacDonell S. Rethinking health workforce planning: Capturing health system social and power interactions through actor analysis. Futures. 2018;99:16–27.CrossRef
45.
Imison C, Buchan J, Xavier S. NHS Workforce planning: limitations and possibilities. London: The Kings Fund; 2009.
46.
Thevoz S. Health integration: the best way to secure better outcomes? London: Leadership Centre; 2016.
47.
Armitage GD, Suter E, Oelke ND, Adair CE. Health systems integration: state of the evidence. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:2.CrossRef
48.
Middleton L, Cumming J. At risk individuals model of care: an evaluation. Health Services Research Centre: Wellington; 2016.
49.
Cuff PA. Interprofessional education for collaboration: learning how to improve health from interprofessional models across the continuum of education to practice: workshop summary: National Academies Press; 2013.
50.
Pullon SS, Wilson C, Gallagher P, Skinner M, McKinlay E, Gray L, et al. Transition to practice: can rural interprofessional education make a difference? A cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:154.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Suter E, Deutschlander S, Mickelson G, Nurani Z, Lait J, Harrison L, et al. Can interprofessional collaboration provide health human resources solutions? A knowledge synthesis. J Interprof Care. 2012;26(4):261–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Pelham K, Skinner MA, McHugh P, Pullon S. Interprofessional education in a rural community: the perspectives of the clinical workplace providers. J Prim Health Care. 2016;8(3):210–9.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Rees GH, Gauld R, Crampton P, MacDonell S. The promise of complementarity: using the methods of foresight for health workforce planning. Health Serv Manage Res. 2018;31(2):97–105.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Hermans LM, Thissen WA. Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;196(2):808–18.CrossRef
55.
Koopmans L, Damen N, Wagner C. Does diverse staff and skill mix of teams impact quality of care in long-term elderly health care? An exploratory case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:988.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Gauld R. Disrupting the present to build a stronger health workforce for the future: a three-point agenda. J Prim Health Care. 2018;10(1):6–10.PubMedCrossRef
57.
58.
Bevan H, Robert G, Bate P, Maher L, Wells J. Using a design approach to assist large-scale organizational change: “10 high impact changes” to improve the National Health Service in England. J Appl Behav Sci. 2007;43(1):135–52.CrossRef
59.
Rees GH. Editorial: Addressing inadequate health workforce intelligence. Intern Med J. 2015;45:887–9.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Naccarella L, Wraight B, Gorman DF. Is health workforce planning recognising the dynamic interplay between health literacy at an individual, organisation and system level? Aust Health Rev. 2016;40(1):33–5.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Holmes GM, Morrison M, Pathman DE, Fraher E. The contribution of “plasticity” to modeling how a community’s need for health care services can be met by different configurations of physicians. Acad Med. 2013;88(12):1877–82.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Suter E, Birney A, Charland P, Misfeldt R, Weiss S, Howden JS, et al. Optimizing the interprofessional workforce for centralized intake of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid disease: case study. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(1):41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Adair V, Adair A, Coster H. Final evaluation report for primary care practice assistant demonstration programme. AC Research Associates New Zealand: Auckland; 2013.
64.
King A, Boyd M, Carver P, Dagley E. Evaluation of a gerontology nurse specialist in primary health care: case finding, care coordination and service integration for At-Risk Older People. Auckland: Waitemata PHO, Waitemata DHB, The University of Auckland; 2011.
65.
Peri K, Boyd M, Foster S, Stillwell Y. Evaluation of the nurse practitioner in aged care. A report prepared for Central PHO and MidCentral DHB. Auckland: University of Auckland; 2013.
66.
Naccarella L, Greenstock L. What makes Health Workforce New Zealand’s workforce service reviews work? AHWI: Melbourne; 2011.
67.
Veenman SA. Futures studies and uncertainty in public policy: a case study on the ageing population in the Netherlands. Futures. 2013;53:42–52.CrossRef
68.
Naccarella L, Greenstock L, Wraight B. An evaluation of New Zealand’s iterative Workforce Service Reviews: a new way of thinking about health workforce planning. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37:251–5.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Villa L. Evaluation of the physician assistant pilot programme in general medicine (2013). Counties Manakau Health: Auckland; 2014.
70.
71.
Twaddle S, Khan M. Health and disability kaiawhina worker workforce. BERL Economics: Wellington; 2014.
72.
Rees GH, Crampton P, Gauld R, MacDonell S. New Zealand’s health workforce planning should embrace complexity and uncertainty. N Z Med J. 2018;131(1477):109–15.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
Author
Gareth H. Rees
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0390-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Human Resources for Health 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research

Tracking the leavers: towards a better understanding of doctor migration from Ireland to Australia 2008–2018

Research

Hypertension management in rural western Kenya: a needs-based health workforce estimation model

Research

Job satisfaction of public and private primary care physicians in Malaysia: analysis of findings from QUALICO-PC

Research

The early retiree divests the health workforce: a quantitative analysis of early retirement among Canadian Registered Nurses and allied health professionals

Research

Reducing maternal and newborn mortality in Nigeria—a qualitative study of stakeholders’ perceptions about the performance of community health workers and the introduction of community midwifery at primary healthcare level

Case study

Analysing public sector institutional capacity for health workforce governance in the South-East Asia region of WHO