Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Thrombosis Journal 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | COPD Exacerbation | Research

Adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism in patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation: results from the SLICE trial

Authors: Carmen Rodríguez, Luis Jara-Palomares, Eva Tabernero, Andrés Tenes, Sara González, Winnifer Briceño, José Luis Lobo, Raquel Morillo, Behnood Bikdeli, David Jiménez

Published in: Thrombosis Journal | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), age- or clinically-adjusted D-dimer threshold level can be used to define a negative test that safely excludes PE and reduces the use of imaging. However, the utility of this approach in patients hospitalized for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation is undefined.

Methods

We ran an analysis of the patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation and randomized to the intervention in the SLICE trial. Using the conventional strategy as the reference, we compared the proportion of patients with a negative D-dimer result, and the negative predictive value and sensitivity of three D-dimer threshold strategies for initial PE or subsequent diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE): the age-adjusted strategy, the Wells-adjusted strategy, and the YEARS-adjusted strategy.

Results

We included 368 patients. Using a conventional threshold, 182 (49.5%) patients had negative D-dimer values, of whom 1 (0.6%) had PE (sensitivity, 94.1%). The use of an age-adjusted threshold increased the number of patients in whom PE could be excluded from 182 to 233 patients (63.3%), and the proportion of false-negative findings increased from 0.5% to 1.7% (sensitivity, 76.5%). With the use of the Wells or YEARS strategies, 64.4% and 71.5% had negative values, and the proportion of false-negative findings was 2.5% (sensitivity, 64.7%) and 2.7% (sensitivity, 58.8%), respectively.

Conclusions

In patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation, compared with the conventional strategy, age- or clinically-adjusted strategies of D-dimer interpretation were associated with a larger proportion of patients in whom PE was ruled out with a higher failure rate.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02238639.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41:543–603.CrossRef Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41:543–603.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lim W, Le Gal G, Bates S, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv. 2018;2:3226–56.CrossRef Lim W, Le Gal G, Bates S, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv. 2018;2:3226–56.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:98–107.CrossRef Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:98–107.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA. 2014;311:1117–24.CrossRef Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA. 2014;311:1117–24.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with D-dimer adjusted to clinical probability. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2125–34.CrossRef Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with D-dimer adjusted to clinical probability. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2125–34.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, et al. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390:289–97.CrossRef Van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, et al. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390:289–97.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Winter JH, Buckler PW, Bautista AP, et al. Frequency of venous thrombosis in patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive lung disease. Thorax. 1983;38:605–8.CrossRef Winter JH, Buckler PW, Bautista AP, et al. Frequency of venous thrombosis in patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive lung disease. Thorax. 1983;38:605–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tillie-Leblond I, Marquette CH, Perez T, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:390–6.CrossRef Tillie-Leblond I, Marquette CH, Perez T, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:390–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rutschmann OT, Cornuz J, Poletti PA, et al. Should pulmonary embolism be suspected in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Thorax. 2007;62:121–5.CrossRef Rutschmann OT, Cornuz J, Poletti PA, et al. Should pulmonary embolism be suspected in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Thorax. 2007;62:121–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rizkallah J, Man P, Sin D. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute exacerbations of COPD. Chest. 2009;135:786–93.CrossRef Rizkallah J, Man P, Sin D. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute exacerbations of COPD. Chest. 2009;135:786–93.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jiménez D, Agustí A, Tabernero E, et al. Effect of a pulmonary embolism diagnostic strategy on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326:1277–85.CrossRef Jiménez D, Agustí A, Tabernero E, et al. Effect of a pulmonary embolism diagnostic strategy on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326:1277–85.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jimenez D, Agusti A, Monreal M, et al. The rationale, design, and methods of a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an active strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42:346–51.CrossRef Jimenez D, Agusti A, Monreal M, et al. The rationale, design, and methods of a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an active strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42:346–51.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Agresti A, Min Y. Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions. Stat Med. 2005;24:729–40.CrossRef Agresti A, Min Y. Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions. Stat Med. 2005;24:729–40.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe MS. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics. 2000;56:345–51.CrossRef Leisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe MS. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics. 2000;56:345–51.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dronkers CEA, van der Hulle T, Le Gal G, et al. Towards a tailored diagnostic standard for future diagnostic studies in pulmonary embolism: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15:1040–3.CrossRef Dronkers CEA, van der Hulle T, Le Gal G, et al. Towards a tailored diagnostic standard for future diagnostic studies in pulmonary embolism: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15:1040–3.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Douma RA, Le Gal G, Sohne M, et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ. 2010;340:c1475.CrossRef Douma RA, Le Gal G, Sohne M, et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ. 2010;340:c1475.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Koek HL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2492.CrossRef Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Koek HL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2492.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Van Es N, van der Hulle T, van Es J, et al. Wells rule and D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:253–61.CrossRef Van Es N, van der Hulle T, van Es J, et al. Wells rule and D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:253–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Monreal M, Sanchez Muñoz Torrero JF, Naraine VS, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure. Am J Med. 2006;119:851–8.CrossRef Monreal M, Sanchez Muñoz Torrero JF, Naraine VS, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure. Am J Med. 2006;119:851–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kabrhel C, Matts C, McNamara M, et al. A highly sensitive ELISA D-dimer increases testing but not diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:519–24.CrossRef Kabrhel C, Matts C, McNamara M, et al. A highly sensitive ELISA D-dimer increases testing but not diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:519–24.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism in patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation: results from the SLICE trial
Authors
Carmen Rodríguez
Luis Jara-Palomares
Eva Tabernero
Andrés Tenes
Sara González
Winnifer Briceño
José Luis Lobo
Raquel Morillo
Behnood Bikdeli
David Jiménez
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Thrombosis Journal / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1477-9560
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00368-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Thrombosis Journal 1/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine