Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese in a general population

Authors: Josane Soares Pinto Melo, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Adriana Sousa Rêgo, Daniel Santos Rocha, Isabel Aparecida Porcatti de Walsh, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez, Maria Claudia Gonçalves, Karen Larissa Brito Damasceno, Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes, Daniela Bassi-Dibai

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 (WRFQ 2.0) is an instrument that measures the difficulties perceived by workers in meeting work demands, given their physical or emotional health, but it has not yet been adapted for Brazil. Thus, this study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the WRFQ 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese.

Methods

This is an observational study. Initially, translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese was carried out. After that, this version was submitted to an evaluation of its internal structure. The internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed. To determine the construct validity, Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) was used to determine the magnitude of correlation between the WRFQ 2.0 and the Work Ability Index (WAI), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Self -Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain (SEFIP-work).

Results

The internal structure with five domains and 27 items presented adequate fit indices for the Brazilian version of the WRFQ 2.0. Adequate correlations of the five domains of the WRFQ 2.0 with the NPRS, WAI and SEFIP-work were found (rho ranged between 0.145 and 0.338). The test–retest reliability of the WRFQ 2.0 ranged from substantial to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.785) and internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.852).

Conclusion

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WRFQ 2.0 presents valid internal structure with five domains and 27 items, adequate construct based on correlations with other instruments, and acceptable test–retest reliability and internal consistency.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pinheiro CAB, André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes C, Barros VdS, Melo JSP, Bassi-Dibai D, Dibai-Filho AV. Self-estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain: face and content validity. Fisioter Pesqui. 2020;27:299–305.CrossRef Pinheiro CAB, André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes C, Barros VdS, Melo JSP, Bassi-Dibai D, Dibai-Filho AV. Self-estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain: face and content validity. Fisioter Pesqui. 2020;27:299–305.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Johansen T, Lund T, Jensen C, Momsen A-MH, Eftedal M, Øyeflaten I, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 to Norwegian and Danish. Work. 2018;59:471–8.CrossRef Johansen T, Lund T, Jensen C, Momsen A-MH, Eftedal M, Øyeflaten I, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 to Norwegian and Danish. Work. 2018;59:471–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1147–57.CrossRef Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1147–57.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference da Silva Junior SHA, Vasconcelos AGG, Griep RH, Rotenberg L. Validade e confiabilidade do índice de capacidade para o trabalho (ICT) em trabalhadores de enfermagem. Cad Saúde Pública. 2011;27:1077–87.CrossRef da Silva Junior SHA, Vasconcelos AGG, Griep RH, Rotenberg L. Validade e confiabilidade do índice de capacidade para o trabalho (ICT) em trabalhadores de enfermagem. Cad Saúde Pública. 2011;27:1077–87.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8:23–74. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8:23–74.
18.
go back to reference Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2006. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2006.
19.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–7.CrossRef Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Hoboken: Wiley; 1999.CrossRef Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Hoboken: Wiley; 1999.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese in a general population
Authors
Josane Soares Pinto Melo
Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho
Adriana Sousa Rêgo
Daniel Santos Rocha
Isabel Aparecida Porcatti de Walsh
Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez
Maria Claudia Gonçalves
Karen Larissa Brito Damasceno
Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes
Daniela Bassi-Dibai
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01924-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2022 Go to the issue