Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Proceedings 7/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Proceedings

Comparing performance of non–tree-based and tree-based association mapping methods

Authors: Katherine L. Thompson, David W. Fardo

Published in: BMC Proceedings | Special Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

A central goal in the biomedical and biological sciences is to link variation in quantitative traits to locations along the genome (single nucleotide polymorphisms). Sequencing technology has rapidly advanced in recent decades, along with the statistical methodology to analyze genetic data. Two classes of association mapping methods exist: those that account for the evolutionary relatedness among individuals, and those that ignore the evolutionary relationships among individuals. While the former methods more fully use implicit information in the data, the latter methods are more flexible in the types of data they can handle. This study presents a comparison of the 2 types of association mapping methods when they are applied to simulated data.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donnelly P. Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans. Nature. 2008;456(7223):728–31.CrossRefPubMed Donnelly P. Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans. Nature. 2008;456(7223):728–31.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Besenbacher S, Mailund T, Schierup MH. Local phylogeny mapping of quantitative traits: higher accuracy and better ranking than single-marker association in genomewide scans. Genetics. 2009;181(2):747–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Besenbacher S, Mailund T, Schierup MH. Local phylogeny mapping of quantitative traits: higher accuracy and better ranking than single-marker association in genomewide scans. Genetics. 2009;181(2):747–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Pan F, McMillan L, de Villena FPM, Threadgill D, Wang W. TreeQA: quantitative genome wide association mapping using local perfect phylogeny trees. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2009;415–26. Pan F, McMillan L, de Villena FPM, Threadgill D, Wang W. TreeQA: quantitative genome wide association mapping using local perfect phylogeny trees. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2009;415–26.
5.
go back to reference Thompson K, Kubatko L. Using ancestral information to detect and localize quantitative trait loci in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson K, Kubatko L. Using ancestral information to detect and localize quantitative trait loci in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Zhang X, Wang W. HTreeQA: using semi-perfect phylogeny trees in quantitative trait loci study on genotype data. G3 (Bethesda). 2012;2(2):175–89.CrossRef Zhang Z, Zhang X, Wang W. HTreeQA: using semi-perfect phylogeny trees in quantitative trait loci study on genotype data. G3 (Bethesda). 2012;2(2):175–89.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Blangero J, Teslovich TM, Sim X, Almeida MA, Jun G, Dyer TD, Johnson M, Peralta JM, Manning AK, Wood AR, et al. Omics squared: human genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic data for Genetic Analysis Workshop 19. BMC Proc. 2015;9 Suppl 8:S2. Blangero J, Teslovich TM, Sim X, Almeida MA, Jun G, Dyer TD, Johnson M, Peralta JM, Manning AK, Wood AR, et al. Omics squared: human genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic data for Genetic Analysis Workshop 19. BMC Proc. 2015;9 Suppl 8:S2.
9.
go back to reference Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing data inference for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(5):1084–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing data inference for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(5):1084–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Safran M, Dalah I, Alexander J, Rosen N, Iny Stein T, Shmoish M, Nativ N, Bahir I, Doniger T, Krug H, et al. GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. 2010;2010:baq020. Safran M, Dalah I, Alexander J, Rosen N, Iny Stein T, Shmoish M, Nativ N, Bahir I, Doniger T, Krug H, et al. GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. 2010;2010:baq020.
11.
go back to reference Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker R, Lunter G, Marth G, Sherry ST, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker R, Lunter G, Marth G, Sherry ST, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
Metadata
Title
Comparing performance of non–tree-based and tree-based association mapping methods
Authors
Katherine L. Thompson
David W. Fardo
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Proceedings / Issue Special Issue 7/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1753-6561
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-016-0063-4

Other articles of this Special Issue 7/2016

BMC Proceedings 7/2016 Go to the issue