Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Breast Cancer | Research article

The Biomarker Toolkit — an evidence-based guideline to predict cancer biomarker success and guide development

Authors: Katerina-Vanessa Savva, Michal Kawka, Bhamini Vadhwana, Rahul Penumaka, Imogen Patton, Komal Khan, Claire Perrott, Saranya Das, Maxime Giot, Stella Mavroveli, George B. Hanna, Melody Zhifang Ni, Christopher J. Peters

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An increased number of resources are allocated on cancer biomarker discovery, but very few of these biomarkers are clinically adopted. To bridge the gap between Biomarker discovery and clinical use, we aim to generate the Biomarker Toolkit, a tool designed to identify clinically promising biomarkers and promote successful biomarker translation.

Methods

All features associated with a clinically useful biomarker were identified using mixed-methodology, including systematic literature search, semi-structured interviews, and an online two-stage Delphi-Survey. Validation of the checklist was achieved by independent systematic literature searches using keywords/subheadings related to clinically and non-clinically utilised breast and colorectal cancer biomarkers. Composite aggregated scores were generated for each selected publication based on the presence/absence of an attribute listed in the Biomarker Toolkit checklist.

Results

Systematic literature search identified 129 attributes associated with a clinically useful biomarker. These were grouped in four main categories including: rationale, clinical utility, analytical validity, and clinical validity. This checklist was subsequently developed using semi-structured interviews with biomarker experts (n=34); and 88.23% agreement was achieved regarding the identified attributes, via the Delphi survey (consensus level:75%, n=51). Quantitative validation was completed using clinically and non-clinically implemented breast and colorectal cancer biomarkers. Cox-regression analysis suggested that total score is a significant driver of biomarker success in both cancer types (BC: p>0.0001, 95.0% CI: 0.869–0.935, CRC: p>0.0001, 95.0% CI: 0.918–0.954).

Conclusions

This novel study generated a validated checklist with literature-reported attributes linked with successful biomarker implementation. Ultimately, the application of this toolkit can be used to detect biomarkers with the highest clinical potential and shape how biomarker studies are designed/performed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sturgeon C, Hill R, Hortin GL, Thompson D. Taking a new biomarker into routine use - a perspective from the routine clinical biochemistry laboratory. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;4:892–903.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sturgeon C, Hill R, Hortin GL, Thompson D. Taking a new biomarker into routine use - a perspective from the routine clinical biochemistry laboratory. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;4:892–903.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Ioannidis JPA, Bossuyt PMM. Waste, leaks, and failures in the biomarker pipeline. Clin Chem. 2017;63(5):963–72.CrossRefPubMed Ioannidis JPA, Bossuyt PMM. Waste, leaks, and failures in the biomarker pipeline. Clin Chem. 2017;63(5):963–72.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mordente A, Meucci E, Martorana GE, Silvestrini A. Cancer biomarkers discovery and validation: state of the art, problems and future perspectives. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:9–26.CrossRefPubMed Mordente A, Meucci E, Martorana GE, Silvestrini A. Cancer biomarkers discovery and validation: state of the art, problems and future perspectives. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:9–26.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Salgado R, Moore H, Martens JWM, Lively T, Malik S, McDermott U, et al. Societal challenges of precision medicine: bringing order to chaos. Eur J Cancer. 2017;84:325–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salgado R, Moore H, Martens JWM, Lively T, Malik S, McDermott U, et al. Societal challenges of precision medicine: bringing order to chaos. Eur J Cancer. 2017;84:325–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(1):W1–2. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(1):W1–2.
7.
go back to reference Mcshane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies ( REMARK ). Br J Cancer. 2005;93(4):387–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mcshane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies ( REMARK ). Br J Cancer. 2005;93(4):387–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Huddy JR, Ni M, Misra S, Mavroveli S, Barlow J, Hanna GB. Development of the Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool ( POCKET ): a checklist for multi-dimensional evidence generation in point-of-care tests. 2018. Huddy JR, Ni M, Misra S, Mavroveli S, Barlow J, Hanna GB. Development of the Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool ( POCKET ): a checklist for multi-dimensional evidence generation in point-of-care tests. 2018.
10.
go back to reference Tie YC, Birks M, Francis K. Grounded theory research : a design framework for novice researchers. 2019. Tie YC, Birks M, Francis K. Grounded theory research : a design framework for novice researchers. 2019.
12.
go back to reference Huddy JR, Ni M, Misra S, Mavroveli S, Barlow J, Hanna GB. Development of the Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET): a checklist for multi-dimensional evidence generation in point-of-care tests. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(6):845–55.CrossRefPubMed Huddy JR, Ni M, Misra S, Mavroveli S, Barlow J, Hanna GB. Development of the Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET): a checklist for multi-dimensional evidence generation in point-of-care tests. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(6):845–55.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weller SC, Vickers B, Russell Bernard H, Blackburn AM, Borgatti S, Gravlee CC, et al. Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):1–18.CrossRef Weller SC, Vickers B, Russell Bernard H, Blackburn AM, Borgatti S, Gravlee CC, et al. Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):1–18.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference DeJonckheere M, Vaughn LM. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Community Heal. 2019;7(2):1–8. DeJonckheere M, Vaughn LM. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Community Heal. 2019;7(2):1–8.
15.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research ( COREQ ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research ( COREQ ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Slade SC, Dionne CE, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: PRotocol for a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):1–5.CrossRef Slade SC, Dionne CE, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: PRotocol for a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):1–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–9. Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–9. 
20.
go back to reference Mike Fritz PDB. Improving the user experience through practical data analytics. 2015. Mike Fritz PDB. Improving the user experience through practical data analytics. 2015.
21.
go back to reference Stel VS, Dekker FW, Tripepi G, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Survival analysis ii: Cox regression. Nephron - Clin Pract. 2011;119(3):255–60.CrossRef Stel VS, Dekker FW, Tripepi G, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Survival analysis ii: Cox regression. Nephron - Clin Pract. 2011;119(3):255–60.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lavezzari G, Womack AW. Industry perspectives on biomarker qualification. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(2):208–13.CrossRefPubMed Lavezzari G, Womack AW. Industry perspectives on biomarker qualification. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(2):208–13.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Monaghan PJ, Robinson S, Rajdl D, Bossuyt PMM, Sandberg S, St John A, et al. Practical guide for identifying unmet clinical needs for biomarkers. Ejifcc. 2018;29(2):129–37. Monaghan PJ, Robinson S, Rajdl D, Bossuyt PMM, Sandberg S, St John A, et al. Practical guide for identifying unmet clinical needs for biomarkers. Ejifcc. 2018;29(2):129–37. 
24.
go back to reference NICE. Molecular testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer (DG27). 2017. NICE. Molecular testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer (DG27). 2017.
Metadata
Title
The Biomarker Toolkit — an evidence-based guideline to predict cancer biomarker success and guide development
Authors
Katerina-Vanessa Savva
Michal Kawka
Bhamini Vadhwana
Rahul Penumaka
Imogen Patton
Komal Khan
Claire Perrott
Saranya Das
Maxime Giot
Stella Mavroveli
George B. Hanna
Melody Zhifang Ni
Christopher J. Peters
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03075-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medicine 1/2023 Go to the issue