Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research article

Health systems’ preparedness to provide post-abortion care: assessment of health facilities in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Nigeria

Authors: Kenneth Juma, Ramatou Ouedraogo, Joshua Amo-Adjei, Ali Sie, Mamadou Ouattara, Nkechi Emma-Echiegu, Joseph Eton, Michael Mutua, Martin Bangha

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In many parts of sub-Saharan Africa, access to abortion is legally restricted, which partly contributes to high incidence of unsafe abortion. This may result in unsafe abortion-related complications that demand long hospital stays, treatment and attendance by skilled health providers. There is however, limited knowledge on the capacity of public health facilities to deliver post-abortion care (PAC), and the spread of PAC services in these settings. We describe and discuss the preparedness and capacity of public health facilities to deliver complete and quality PAC services in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Nigeria.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of primary, secondary and tertiary-level public health facilities was conducted between November 2018 and February 2019 in the three countries. Data on signal functions (including information on essential equipment and supplies, staffing and training among others) for measuring the ability of health facilities to provide post-abortion services were collected and analyzed.

Results

Across the three countries, fewer primary health facilities (ranging from 6.3–12.1% in Kenya and Burkina Faso) had the capacity to deliver on all components of basic PAC services. Approximately one-third (26–43%) of referral facilities across Burkina Faso, Kenya and Nigeria could provide comprehensive PAC services. Lack of trained staff, absence of necessary equipment and lack of PAC commodities and supplies were a main reason for inability to deliver specific PAC services (such as surgical procedures for abortion complications, blood transfusion and post-PAC contraceptive counselling). Further, the lack of capacity to refer acute PAC cases to higher-level facilities was identified as a key weakness in provision of post-abortion care services.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal considerable gaps and weaknesses in the delivery of basic and comprehensive PAC within the three countries, linked to both the legal and policy contexts for abortion as well as broad health system challenges in the countries. There is a need for increased investments by governments to strengthen the capacity of primary, secondary and tertiary public health facilities to deliver quality PAC services, in order to increase access to PAC and avert preventable maternal mortalities.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Burkina Faso. LOI N025–2018/AN - PORTANT CODE PENAL: Burkina Faso Burkina Faso; 2018. Burkina Faso. LOI N025–2018/AN - PORTANT CODE PENAL: Burkina Faso Burkina Faso; 2018.
37.
go back to reference Ross J, Campbell O, Bulatao R. The maternal and neonatal Programme effort index (MNPI). Tropical Med Int Health. 2001;6:787–98.CrossRef Ross J, Campbell O, Bulatao R. The maternal and neonatal Programme effort index (MNPI). Tropical Med Int Health. 2001;6:787–98.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health systems’ preparedness to provide post-abortion care: assessment of health facilities in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Nigeria
Authors
Kenneth Juma
Ramatou Ouedraogo
Joshua Amo-Adjei
Ali Sie
Mamadou Ouattara
Nkechi Emma-Echiegu
Joseph Eton
Michael Mutua
Martin Bangha
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07873-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Health Services Research 1/2022 Go to the issue