Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Not all waits are equal: an exploratory investigation of emergency care patient pathways

Authors: Dawn Swancutt, Sian Joel-Edgar, Michael Allen, Daniel Thomas, Heather Brant, Jonathan Benger, Richard Byng, Jonathan Pinkney

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasing pressure in the United Kingdom (UK) urgent care system has led to Emergency Departments (EDs) failing to meet the national requirement that 95% of patients are admitted, discharged or transferred within 4-h of arrival. Despite the target being the same for all acute hospitals, individual Trusts organise their services in different ways. The impact of this variation on patient journey time and waiting is unknown. Our study aimed to apply the Lean technique of Value Stream Mapping (VSM) to investigate care processes and delays in patient journeys at four contrasting hospitals.

Methods

VSM timing data were collected for patients accessing acute care at four hospitals in South West England. Data were categorised according to waits and activities, which were compared across sites to identify variations in practice from the patient viewpoint. We included Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) to fully interpret our findings; observations and initial findings were considered in a PPI workshop.

Results

One hundred eight patients were recruited, comprising 25,432 min of patient time containing 4098 episodes of care or waiting. The median patient journey was 223 min (3 h, 43 min); just within the 4-h target. Although total patient journey times were similar between sites, the stage where the greatest proportion of waiting occurred varied. Reasons for waiting were dominated by waits for beds, investigations or results to be available. From our sample we observed that EDs without a discharge/clinical decision area exhibited a greater proportion of waiting time following an admission or discharge decision. PPI interpretation indicated that patients who experience waits at the beginning of their journey feel more anxious because they are ‘not in the system yet’.

Conclusions

The novel application of VSM analysis across different hospitals, coupled with PPI interpretation, provides important insight into the impact of care provision on patient experience. Measures that could reduce patient waiting include automatic notification of test results, and the option of discharge/clinical decision areas for patients awaiting results or departure. To enhance patient experience, good communication with patients and relatives about reasons for waits is essential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hassan T, Walker B, Harrison M, Rae F. Stretched to the limit: a survey of Emergency Medicine consultants in the UK. The College of Emergency Medicine; 2013. Hassan T, Walker B, Harrison M, Rae F. Stretched to the limit: a survey of Emergency Medicine consultants in the UK. The College of Emergency Medicine; 2013.
2.
go back to reference NHS England: Improving A&E Performance. 2013. NHS England: Improving A&E Performance. 2013.
3.
go back to reference Holden D, Smart D. Adding value to the patient experience in emergency medicine: what features of the emergency department visit are most important to patients? Emergen Med. 1999;11(1):3–8.CrossRef Holden D, Smart D. Adding value to the patient experience in emergency medicine: what features of the emergency department visit are most important to patients? Emergen Med. 1999;11(1):3–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference King DL, Ben-Tovim DI, Bassham J. Redesigning emergency department patient flows: application of Lean Thinking to health care. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(4):391–7.CrossRefPubMed King DL, Ben-Tovim DI, Bassham J. Redesigning emergency department patient flows: application of Lean Thinking to health care. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(4):391–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ng D, Vail G, Thomas S, Schmidt N. Applying the Lean principles of the Toyota Production System to reduce wait times in the emergency department. CJEM. 2010;12(1):50–7.CrossRefPubMed Ng D, Vail G, Thomas S, Schmidt N. Applying the Lean principles of the Toyota Production System to reduce wait times in the emergency department. CJEM. 2010;12(1):50–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ohno T. The Toyoto production system: beyond large-scale production. Portland: Productivity Press; 1988. Ohno T. The Toyoto production system: beyond large-scale production. Portland: Productivity Press; 1988.
9.
go back to reference Brandao de Souza L. Trends and approaches in lean healthcare. Leadersh Health Serv. 2009;22(2):121–39.CrossRef Brandao de Souza L. Trends and approaches in lean healthcare. Leadersh Health Serv. 2009;22(2):121–39.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ford AL, Williams JA, Spencer M, McCammon C, Khoury N, Sampson TR, et al. Reducing door-to-needle times using Toyota's lean manufacturing principles and value stream analysis. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3395–8. Ford AL, Williams JA, Spencer M, McCammon C, Khoury N, Sampson TR, et al. Reducing door-to-needle times using Toyota's lean manufacturing principles and value stream analysis. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3395–8.
12.
go back to reference Bruni R, Laupacis A, Levinson W, Martin D. Public views on a wait time management initiative: a matter of communication. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bruni R, Laupacis A, Levinson W, Martin D. Public views on a wait time management initiative: a matter of communication. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Burstrom L, Starrin B, Engstrom M, Thulesius H. Waiting management at the emergency department - a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burstrom L, Starrin B, Engstrom M, Thulesius H. Waiting management at the emergency department - a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Burstrom L, Letterstal A, Engstrom M-L, Berglund A, Enlund M. The patient safety culture as perceived by staff at two different emergency departments before and after introducing a flow-oriented working model with team triage and lean principles: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):296.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burstrom L, Letterstal A, Engstrom M-L, Berglund A, Enlund M. The patient safety culture as perceived by staff at two different emergency departments before and after introducing a flow-oriented working model with team triage and lean principles: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):296.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Ortiga B, Salazar A, Jovell A, Escarrabill J, Marca G, Corbella X. Standardizing admission and discharge processes to improve patient flow: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ortiga B, Salazar A, Jovell A, Escarrabill J, Marca G, Corbella X. Standardizing admission and discharge processes to improve patient flow: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Pinkney J, Rance S, Benger J, Brant H, Joel-Edgar S, Swancutt D, Westlake D, Pearson M, Thomas D, Holme I, et al. How can frontline expertise and new models of care best contribute to safely reducing avoidable acute admissions? A mixed-methods study of four acute hospitals. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4(3):21–60.CrossRef Pinkney J, Rance S, Benger J, Brant H, Joel-Edgar S, Swancutt D, Westlake D, Pearson M, Thomas D, Holme I, et al. How can frontline expertise and new models of care best contribute to safely reducing avoidable acute admissions? A mixed-methods study of four acute hospitals. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4(3):21–60.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Centre HaSCI: Hospital Accident and Emergency Activity: 2015–16. 2017. Centre HaSCI: Hospital Accident and Emergency Activity: 2015–16. 2017.
18.
go back to reference Gibson A, Lethbridge S, Rance S, Welsman J. Avoidable Acute Admissions study: exploring the contribution of patients and carers to innovative research designs. INVOLVE Conference; 2014. Gibson A, Lethbridge S, Rance S, Welsman J. Avoidable Acute Admissions study: exploring the contribution of patients and carers to innovative research designs. INVOLVE Conference; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Wise J. Royal college calls on hospitals to tackle emergency department “exit block” to hospital beds. BMJ. 2015;350:h849.CrossRefPubMed Wise J. Royal college calls on hospitals to tackle emergency department “exit block” to hospital beds. BMJ. 2015;350:h849.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Holden RJ. Lean thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(3):265–78.CrossRefPubMed Holden RJ. Lean thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(3):265–78.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dickson EW, Anguelov Z, Vetterick D, Eller A, Singh S. Use of lean in the emergency department: a case series of 4 hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(4):504–10.CrossRefPubMed Dickson EW, Anguelov Z, Vetterick D, Eller A, Singh S. Use of lean in the emergency department: a case series of 4 hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(4):504–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nairn S, Whotton E, Marshal C, Roberts M, Swann G. The patient experience in emergency departments: a review of the literature. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004;12(3):159–65.CrossRefPubMed Nairn S, Whotton E, Marshal C, Roberts M, Swann G. The patient experience in emergency departments: a review of the literature. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004;12(3):159–65.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Allder S, Silvester K, Walley P. Managing capacity and demand across the patient journey. Clin Med. 2010;10(1):13–5.CrossRef Allder S, Silvester K, Walley P. Managing capacity and demand across the patient journey. Clin Med. 2010;10(1):13–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Walley P, Silvester K, Steyn R. Managing variation in demand: lessons from the UK National Health Service. J Healthc Manag. 2006;51(5):309–20. discussion 320-302PubMed Walley P, Silvester K, Steyn R. Managing variation in demand: lessons from the UK National Health Service. J Healthc Manag. 2006;51(5):309–20. discussion 320-302PubMed
27.
go back to reference Department of Health: Healthy Building Note 15–01: accident & emergency departments. 2013. Department of Health: Healthy Building Note 15–01: accident & emergency departments. 2013.
28.
go back to reference NHS England: High quality care for all, now and for future generations: transforming urgent and emergency care services in England - Urgent and Emergency Care Review End of Phase 1 Report. 2013. NHS England: High quality care for all, now and for future generations: transforming urgent and emergency care services in England - Urgent and Emergency Care Review End of Phase 1 Report. 2013.
Metadata
Title
Not all waits are equal: an exploratory investigation of emergency care patient pathways
Authors
Dawn Swancutt
Sian Joel-Edgar
Michael Allen
Daniel Thomas
Heather Brant
Jonathan Benger
Richard Byng
Jonathan Pinkney
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2349-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue