Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 7/2016

Open Access 01-11-2016 | Research

What is the role of community capabilities for maternal health? An exploration of community capabilities as determinants to institutional deliveries in Bangladesh, India, and Uganda

Authors: Ligia Paina, Lalitha Vadrevu, S. M. Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi, Joseph Akuze, Rachel Rieder, Kitty S. Chan, David H. Peters

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Special Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While community capabilities are recognized as important factors in developing resilient health systems and communities, appropriate metrics for these have not yet been developed. Furthermore, the role of community capabilities on access to maternal health services has been underexplored. In this paper, we summarize the development of a community capability score based on the Future Health System (FHS) project’s experience in Bangladesh, India, and Uganda, and, examine the role of community capabilities as determinants of institutional delivery in these three contexts.

Methods

We developed a community capability score using a pooled dataset containing cross-sectional household survey data from Bangladesh, India, and Uganda. Our main outcome of interest was whether the woman delivered in an institution. Our predictor variables included the community capability score, as well as a series of previously identified determinants of maternal health. We calculate both population-averaged effects (using GEE logistic regression), as well as sub-national level effects (using a mixed effects model).

Results

Our final sample for analysis included 2775 women, of which 1238 were from Bangladesh, 1199 from India, and 338 from Uganda. We found that individual-level determinants of institutional deliveries, such as maternal education, parity, and ante-natal care access were significant in our analysis and had a strong impact on a woman’s odds of delivering in an institution. We also found that, in addition to individual-level determinants, greater community capability was significantly associated with higher odds of institutional delivery. For every additional capability, the odds of institutional delivery would increase by up to almost 6 %.

Conclusion

Individual-level characteristics are strong determinants of whether a woman delivered in an institution. However, we found that community capability also plays an important role, and should be taken into account when designing programs and interventions to support institutional deliveries. Consideration of individual factors and the capabilities of the communities in which people live would contribute to the vision of supporting people-centered approaches to health.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peters DH, et al. Poverty and access to health care in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161–71.CrossRefPubMed Peters DH, et al. Poverty and access to health care in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO global strategy on people-centered and intergated health services - interim report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. World Health Organization. WHO global strategy on people-centered and intergated health services - interim report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
4.
go back to reference Shaver S, Tudball J. Literature review on factors contributing to comunity capabilities. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales - Social Policy Research Centre; 2002. Shaver S, Tudball J. Literature review on factors contributing to comunity capabilities. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales - Social Policy Research Centre; 2002.
5.
go back to reference George AS. Unlocking community capabilities to improve health service delivery. Baltimore: Future Health Systems Programme; 2013. George AS. Unlocking community capabilities to improve health service delivery. Baltimore: Future Health Systems Programme; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Poole D. Building community capacity to promote social and public health: challenges for universities. Health Soc Work. 1997;22(3):163–8.CrossRefPubMed Poole D. Building community capacity to promote social and public health: challenges for universities. Health Soc Work. 1997;22(3):163–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Goodman RM, et al. Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(3):258–78.CrossRefPubMed Goodman RM, et al. Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(3):258–78.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liberato SC, et al. Measuring capacity building in communities: a review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–10.CrossRef Liberato SC, et al. Measuring capacity building in communities: a review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference George AS, et al. Synergies, strenghts, and challenges: Findings on community capability from a systematic health systems research literature. BMC Health Services Research. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1860-1 George AS, et al. Synergies, strenghts, and challenges: Findings on community capability from a systematic health systems research literature. BMC Health Services Research. 2016. doi:10.​1186/​s12913-016-1860-1
10.
go back to reference Narayan D. Measuring empowernemnt: cross disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2005. Narayan D. Measuring empowernemnt: cross disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2005.
11.
go back to reference Khwaja AI. A note on “measuring empowerment” - an economist’s perspective. In: Workshop on “measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives”. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2003. Khwaja AI. A note on “measuring empowerment” - an economist’s perspective. In: Workshop on “measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives”. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2003.
12.
go back to reference Fawcett S, et al. Evaluating community efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1995. Fawcett S, et al. Evaluating community efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1995.
13.
go back to reference Perkins DD, Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory, research, and application. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23(5):569–79.CrossRefPubMed Perkins DD, Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory, research, and application. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23(5):569–79.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wallerstein N. Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1992;6(3):197–205.CrossRefPubMed Wallerstein N. Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1992;6(3):197–205.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Florin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J. Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):417–32.CrossRefPubMed Florin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J. Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):417–32.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference De Silva MJ, et al. Social capital and mental health: a comparative analysis of four low income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):5–20.CrossRefPubMed De Silva MJ, et al. Social capital and mental health: a comparative analysis of four low income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):5–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Harizi K. Measuring and accounting for community capabilities in Kordofan, Sudan. International Food Policy Research Institute; 2007 Harizi K. Measuring and accounting for community capabilities in Kordofan, Sudan. International Food Policy Research Institute; 2007
18.
go back to reference Lippman SA, et al. Development, validation, and performance of a scale to measure community mobilization. Soc Sci Med. 2016;157:127–37.CrossRefPubMed Lippman SA, et al. Development, validation, and performance of a scale to measure community mobilization. Soc Sci Med. 2016;157:127–37.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Underwood C, et al. Community capacity as means to improved health practices and an end in itself: evidence from a multi-stage study. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2012;33(2):105–27.CrossRefPubMed Underwood C, et al. Community capacity as means to improved health practices and an end in itself: evidence from a multi-stage study. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2012;33(2):105–27.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hanifi SMA, Sultan A, Mia MN, Hoque S, Bhuiya A. Chakaria health and demographic surveillance system: focusing on the poor and vulnerable. Demographic events and safe motherhood practices-2014. Dhaka; 2015. p. 52 Hanifi SMA, Sultan A, Mia MN, Hoque S, Bhuiya A. Chakaria health and demographic surveillance system: focusing on the poor and vulnerable. Demographic events and safe motherhood practices-2014. Dhaka; 2015. p. 52
22.
go back to reference Mandal DK, Kaur P, Murhekar MV. Maternal audit revealed high proportion of maternal deaths occurred at home in Sundarbans riverine zone, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India, 2009. Chennai: National Institute of Epidemiology; 2008. Mandal DK, Kaur P, Murhekar MV. Maternal audit revealed high proportion of maternal deaths occurred at home in Sundarbans riverine zone, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India, 2009. Chennai: National Institute of Epidemiology; 2008.
23.
go back to reference Kanjilal B, et al. Health care in the Sundarbans (India): challenges and plan for a better future. Kolkata: Institute of Health Management Research - Future Health Systems Programme; 2010. Kanjilal B, et al. Health care in the Sundarbans (India): challenges and plan for a better future. Kolkata: Institute of Health Management Research - Future Health Systems Programme; 2010.
24.
go back to reference Ekirapa-Kiracho E, et al. Maternal and Newborn Interventions for Equitable Systems (MANIFEST) Study end-line household survey results. Kampala: Makerere University School of Public Health; 2016. Ekirapa-Kiracho E, et al. Maternal and Newborn Interventions for Equitable Systems (MANIFEST) Study end-line household survey results. Kampala: Makerere University School of Public Health; 2016.
25.
go back to reference Hanifi MA, et al. Profile: the Chakaria Health and Demographic Surveillance System. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):667–75.CrossRefPubMed Hanifi MA, et al. Profile: the Chakaria Health and Demographic Surveillance System. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):667–75.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015.
27.
go back to reference Costello A, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assesssment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005;10:1–9. Costello A, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assesssment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005;10:1–9.
28.
go back to reference Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
29.
go back to reference Hanley JA, et al. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(4):364–75.CrossRefPubMed Hanley JA, et al. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(4):364–75.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. GLLAMM manual. In: U.C. Berkley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. U.C. Berkley: U.C. Berkley Division of Biostatistics; 2004. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. GLLAMM manual. In: U.C. Berkley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. U.C. Berkley: U.C. Berkley Division of Biostatistics; 2004.
31.
go back to reference Brazier E, et al. The value of building health promotion capacities within communities: evidence from a maternal health intervention in Guinea. Health Policy and Planning. 2015;30(7):885-94. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu089. Epub 2014 Aug 22. Brazier E, et al. The value of building health promotion capacities within communities: evidence from a maternal health intervention in Guinea. Health Policy and Planning. 2015;30(7):885-94. doi:10.​1093/​heapol/​czu089. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
32.
go back to reference Barman D, Vadrevu L. Effect of community cohesion and membership in community organizations on the child’s dietary adequacy in disadvantaged communities - a case of the Indian Sundarbans. BMC Health Services Research. 2016. TBD(TBD). doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1862-z Barman D, Vadrevu L. Effect of community cohesion and membership in community organizations on the child’s dietary adequacy in disadvantaged communities - a case of the Indian Sundarbans. BMC Health Services Research. 2016. TBD(TBD). doi:10.​1186/​s12913-016-1862-z
33.
go back to reference George AS, et al. Community participation in health systems research: a systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141091.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral George AS, et al. Community participation in health systems research: a systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141091.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Adams AM, Nababan HY, Hanifi SMMA. Building social networks for maternal and newborn health in poor urban settlements: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123817.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adams AM, Nababan HY, Hanifi SMMA. Building social networks for maternal and newborn health in poor urban settlements: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123817.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Rosato M, et al. Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):962–71.CrossRefPubMed Rosato M, et al. Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):962–71.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference USAID Maternal and Child Survival Program. Strategies to strengthen community maternal, newborn, and child health: findings from a cohort of child survival and health grants ending in 2014. Washington, DC: MCSP Program; 2015. USAID Maternal and Child Survival Program. Strategies to strengthen community maternal, newborn, and child health: findings from a cohort of child survival and health grants ending in 2014. Washington, DC: MCSP Program; 2015.
Metadata
Title
What is the role of community capabilities for maternal health? An exploration of community capabilities as determinants to institutional deliveries in Bangladesh, India, and Uganda
Authors
Ligia Paina
Lalitha Vadrevu
S. M. Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi
Joseph Akuze
Rachel Rieder
Kitty S. Chan
David H. Peters
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue Special Issue 7/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1861-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 7/2016

BMC Health Services Research 7/2016 Go to the issue