Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Expectations and needs of patients with a chronic disease toward self-management and eHealth for self-management purposes

Authors: Martine W. J. Huygens, Joan Vermeulen, Ilse C. S. Swinkels, Roland D. Friele, Onno C. P. van Schayck, Luc P. de Witte

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Self-management is considered as an essential component of chronic care by primary care professionals. eHealth is expected to play an important role in supporting patients in their self-management. For effective implementation of eHealth it is important to investigate patients’ expectations and needs regarding self-management and eHealth. The objectives of this study are to investigate expectations and needs of people with a chronic condition regarding self-management and eHealth for self-management purposes, their willingness to use eHealth, and possible differences between patient groups regarding these topics.

Methods

Five focus groups with people with diabetes (n = 14), COPD (n = 9), and a cardiovascular condition (n = 7) were conducted in this qualitative research. Separate focus groups were organized based on patients’ chronic condition. The following themes were discussed: 1) the impact of the chronic disease on patients’ daily life; 2) their opinions and needs regarding self-management; and 3) their expectations and needs regarding, and willingness to use, eHealth for self-management purposes. A conventional content analysis approach was used for coding.

Results

Patient groups seem to differ in expectations and needs regarding self-management and eHealth for self-management purposes. People with diabetes reported most needs and benefits regarding self-management and were most willing to use eHealth, followed by the COPD group. People with a cardiovascular condition mentioned having fewer needs for self-management support, because their disease had little impact on their life. In all patient groups it was reported that the patient, not the care professional, should choose whether or not to use eHealth. Moreover, participants reported that eHealth should not replace, but complement personal care. Many participants reported expecting feelings of anxiety by doing measurement themselves and uncertainty about follow-up of deviant data of measurements. In addition, many participants worried about the implementation of eHealth being a consequence of budget cuts in care.

Conclusion

This study suggests that aspects of eHealth, and the way in which it should be implemented, should be tailored to the patient. Patients’ expected benefits of using eHealth to support self-management and their perceived controllability over their disease seem to play an important role in patients’ willingness to use eHealth for self-management purposes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.CrossRefPubMed Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Moore M. Patients’ perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):300–7.CrossRefPubMed Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Moore M. Patients’ perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):300–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lisa Marsch SL, Dallery J. Behavioral health care and technology: using science-based innovations to transform practice. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Lisa Marsch SL, Dallery J. Behavioral health care and technology: using science-based innovations to transform practice. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
7.
go back to reference Wade AG. Use of the Internet to assist in the treatment of depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;12(4). doi:10.4088/PCC.09r00876blu. Wade AG. Use of the Internet to assist in the treatment of depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;12(4). doi:10.​4088/​PCC.​09r00876blu.
9.
go back to reference de Jong CC, Ros WJ, Schrijvers G. The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e19. doi:10.2196/jmir.3000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Jong CC, Ros WJ, Schrijvers G. The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e19. doi:10.​2196/​jmir.​3000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
go back to reference van Houtum L, Rijken M, Heijmans M, Groenewegen P. Patient-perceived self-management tasks and support needs of people with chronic illness: generic or disease-specific? Ann Behav Med. 2014;49(2):221–9. doi:10.1007/s12160-014-9649-0.CrossRef van Houtum L, Rijken M, Heijmans M, Groenewegen P. Patient-perceived self-management tasks and support needs of people with chronic illness: generic or disease-specific? Ann Behav Med. 2014;49(2):221–9. doi:10.​1007/​s12160-014-9649-0.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference LeRouge C, Wickramasinghe N. A review of user-centered design for diabetes-related consumer health informatics technologies. Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):1039–56.CrossRef LeRouge C, Wickramasinghe N. A review of user-centered design for diabetes-related consumer health informatics technologies. Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):1039–56.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. 2014. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. 2014.
20.
21.
go back to reference Davis FD. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1985. Davis FD. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1985.
22.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27:425–78. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27:425–78.
24.
go back to reference Wallston BS, Wallston KA. Locus of control and health: a review of the literature. Health Educ Behav. 1978;6(1):107–17.CrossRef Wallston BS, Wallston KA. Locus of control and health: a review of the literature. Health Educ Behav. 1978;6(1):107–17.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Barlow J, Sturt J, Hearnshaw H. Self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care: examples from arthritis, asthma and diabetes. Health Educ J. 2002;61(4):365–78. doi:10.1177/001789690206100408.CrossRef Barlow J, Sturt J, Hearnshaw H. Self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions in primary care: examples from arthritis, asthma and diabetes. Health Educ J. 2002;61(4):365–78. doi:10.​1177/​0017896902061004​08.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Theofilou P, Reyes Saborit A. Health locus of control and diabetes adherence. J. Psychol. Psychother. 2012;3. doi:10.4172/2161-0487 Theofilou P, Reyes Saborit A. Health locus of control and diabetes adherence. J. Psychol. Psychother. 2012;3. doi:10.4172/2161-0487
28.
go back to reference Mack N, Woodsong C, MacQueen KM, Guest G, Namey E. Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide. 2005. Mack N, Woodsong C, MacQueen KM, Guest G, Namey E. Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide. 2005.
Metadata
Title
Expectations and needs of patients with a chronic disease toward self-management and eHealth for self-management purposes
Authors
Martine W. J. Huygens
Joan Vermeulen
Ilse C. S. Swinkels
Roland D. Friele
Onno C. P. van Schayck
Luc P. de Witte
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1484-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue