Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Hospital board oversight of quality and safety: a stakeholder analysis exploring the role of trust and intelligence

Authors: Ross Millar, Tim Freeman, Russell Mannion

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospital boards, those executive members charged with developing appropriate organisational strategies and cultures, have an important role to play in safeguarding the care provided by their organisation. However, recent concerns have been raised over boards’ ability to enact their duty to ensure the quality and safety of care. This paper offers critical reflection on the relationship between hospital board oversight and patient safety. In doing so it highlights new perspectives and suggestions for developing this area of study.

Methods

The article draws on 10 interviews with key informants and policy actors who form part of the ‘issue network’ interested in the promotion of patient safety in the English National Health Service.

Results

The interviews surfaced a series of narratives regarding hospital board oversight of patient safety. These elaborated on the role of trust and intelligence in highlighting the potential dangers and limitations of approaches to hospital board oversight which have been narrowly focused on a risk-based view of organisational performance. In response, a need to engage with the development of trust based organisational relationships is identified, in which effective board oversight is built on ‘trust’ characterised by styles of leadership and behaviours that are attentive to the needs and concerns of both staff and patients. Effective board oversight also requires the gathering and triangulating of ‘intelligence’ generated from both national and local information sources.

Conclusions

We call for a re-imagination of hospital board oversight in the light of these different perspectives and articulate an emerging research agenda in this area.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Halligan M, Zecevic A. Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Quality Safety. 2011;20 suppl 4:338–43.CrossRefPubMed Halligan M, Zecevic A. Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Quality Safety. 2011;20 suppl 4:338–43.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Belmont E, Haltom CC, Hastings DA, Homchick RG, Morris L, Taitsman J, et al. A new quality compass: hospital boards’ increased role under the affordable care act. Health Aff. 2011;30(7):1282–9.CrossRef Belmont E, Haltom CC, Hastings DA, Homchick RG, Morris L, Taitsman J, et al. A new quality compass: hospital boards’ increased role under the affordable care act. Health Aff. 2011;30(7):1282–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Francis R. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013. Francis R. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013.
4.
go back to reference Francis R. The Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2010. Francis R. The Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2010.
5.
go back to reference Jha AK, Epstein AM. Hospital governance and the quality of care. Health Aff. 2010;29(supple 1):182–7.CrossRef Jha AK, Epstein AM. Hospital governance and the quality of care. Health Aff. 2010;29(supple 1):182–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Millar R, Mannion R, Freeman T, Davies HTO. Hospital board oversight of patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Milbank Q. 2013;91(supple 4):738–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Millar R, Mannion R, Freeman T, Davies HTO. Hospital board oversight of patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Milbank Q. 2013;91(supple 4):738–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Chambers N. Healthcare board governance. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26 suppl 1:8–14. Chambers N. Healthcare board governance. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26 suppl 1:8–14.
8.
go back to reference Keogh B. Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: overview report. London: NHS England; 2013. Keogh B. Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: overview report. London: NHS England; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Maybin J, Dixon A, Addicott R, Storey J. Accountability in the NHS: implications of the government’s reform programme. London: King’s Fund; 2011. Maybin J, Dixon A, Addicott R, Storey J. Accountability in the NHS: implications of the government’s reform programme. London: King’s Fund; 2011.
12.
go back to reference Harrison S, Smith C. Trust and moral motivation: redundant resources in health and social care? Policy Politics. 2004;32 suppl 3:371–86.CrossRef Harrison S, Smith C. Trust and moral motivation: redundant resources in health and social care? Policy Politics. 2004;32 suppl 3:371–86.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brown P, Calnan M. The risks of managing uncertainty: the limitations of governance and choice, and the potential for trust. Soc Policy Soc. 2010;9 suppl 1:13–24.CrossRef Brown P, Calnan M. The risks of managing uncertainty: the limitations of governance and choice, and the potential for trust. Soc Policy Soc. 2010;9 suppl 1:13–24.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brown P, Calnan M. The civilising process of trust: developing quality mechanisms which are local, professional-led and thus legitimate. Soc Policy Administration. 2011;45 suppl 1:19–37.CrossRef Brown P, Calnan M. The civilising process of trust: developing quality mechanisms which are local, professional-led and thus legitimate. Soc Policy Administration. 2011;45 suppl 1:19–37.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brown P. Trusting in the New NHS: instrumental versus communicative action. Soc Health Illness. 2008;30 suppl 3:349–63.CrossRef Brown P. Trusting in the New NHS: instrumental versus communicative action. Soc Health Illness. 2008;30 suppl 3:349–63.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Le Grand J. Knights and knaves return: public service motivation and the delivery of public services. Int Public Manage J. 2010;13(supple 1):56–71.CrossRef Le Grand J. Knights and knaves return: public service motivation and the delivery of public services. Int Public Manage J. 2010;13(supple 1):56–71.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Smith PC. Performance measurement in health care: history, challenges and prospects. Public Money Manage. 2005b;25(supple 4):213–20.CrossRef Smith PC. Performance measurement in health care: history, challenges and prospects. Public Money Manage. 2005b;25(supple 4):213–20.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bevan G. Regulation and system management. In: Mays N, Dixon A, Jones L, editors. Understanding new labour’s market reforms of the English NHS. London: The King’s Fund; 2011. Bevan G. Regulation and system management. In: Mays N, Dixon A, Jones L, editors. Understanding new labour’s market reforms of the English NHS. London: The King’s Fund; 2011.
19.
go back to reference Bevan G, Hood C. Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? Br Med J. 2012;332(7538):419–22.CrossRef Bevan G, Hood C. Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? Br Med J. 2012;332(7538):419–22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Goddard M, Mannion R, Smith PC. Assessing the performance of NHS trusts: the use of hard and soft information. Health Policy. 1999;48:119–34.CrossRefPubMed Goddard M, Mannion R, Smith PC. Assessing the performance of NHS trusts: the use of hard and soft information. Health Policy. 1999;48:119–34.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Smith C. Understanding trust and confidence: two paradigms and their significance for health and social care. J Appl Philosophy. 2005a;22(supple 3):299–316.CrossRef Smith C. Understanding trust and confidence: two paradigms and their significance for health and social care. J Appl Philosophy. 2005a;22(supple 3):299–316.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Möllering G. The trust/control duality: an integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. Int Sociol. 2005;20(supple 3):283–305.CrossRef Möllering G. The trust/control duality: an integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. Int Sociol. 2005;20(supple 3):283–305.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Elias N. The civilising process: state formation and civilisation. Oxford: Blackwell; 1982. Elias N. The civilising process: state formation and civilisation. Oxford: Blackwell; 1982.
24.
go back to reference Davies HTO, Mannion R. Clinical governance: striking a balance between checking and trusting. In: Smith PC, editor. Reforming markets in health care: an economic perspective. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 2000. Davies HTO, Mannion R. Clinical governance: striking a balance between checking and trusting. In: Smith PC, editor. Reforming markets in health care: an economic perspective. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 2000.
25.
go back to reference Ramsay A, Fulop N, Fresko A, Rubenstein S. The Healthy NHS Board 2013: review of guidance and research evidence. NHS Leadership Academy: Leeds; 2013. Ramsay A, Fulop N, Fresko A, Rubenstein S. The Healthy NHS Board 2013: review of guidance and research evidence. NHS Leadership Academy: Leeds; 2013.
26.
go back to reference King’s Fund. Patient-centred leadership: rediscovering our purpose. London: King’s Fund; 2013. King’s Fund. Patient-centred leadership: rediscovering our purpose. London: King’s Fund; 2013.
27.
go back to reference Joshi MS, Hines S. Getting the board on board: engaging Hospital Boards in quality and patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(supple 4):179–87.PubMed Joshi MS, Hines S. Getting the board on board: engaging Hospital Boards in quality and patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(supple 4):179–87.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Weiner BJ, Shortell SM, Alexander J. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Serv Res. 1997;32(supple 4):491–510.PubMedPubMedCentral Weiner BJ, Shortell SM, Alexander J. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Serv Res. 1997;32(supple 4):491–510.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Goeschel CA, Berenholtz SM, Culbertson RA, Jin LD, Pronovost PJ. Board quality scorecards: measuring improvement. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26 suppl 4:254–60.CrossRefPubMed Goeschel CA, Berenholtz SM, Culbertson RA, Jin LD, Pronovost PJ. Board quality scorecards: measuring improvement. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26 suppl 4:254–60.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Jiang HJ, Lockee C, Bass K, Fraser I. Board engagement in quality: findings of a survey of hospital and system leaders. J Healthc Manag. 2008;53(supple 2):121–34.PubMed Jiang HJ, Lockee C, Bass K, Fraser I. Board engagement in quality: findings of a survey of hospital and system leaders. J Healthc Manag. 2008;53(supple 2):121–34.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Jiang HJ, Lockee C, Bass K, Fraser I. Board oversight of quality: any differences in process of care and mortality? J Healthc Manag. 2009;54(supple 1):15–30.PubMed Jiang HJ, Lockee C, Bass K, Fraser I. Board oversight of quality: any differences in process of care and mortality? J Healthc Manag. 2009;54(supple 1):15–30.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Jha AK, Epstein AM. A survey of board chairs of english hospitals shows greater attention to quality of care than among their US counterparts. Health Aff. 2010;32(supple4):677–85. Jha AK, Epstein AM. A survey of board chairs of english hospitals shows greater attention to quality of care than among their US counterparts. Health Aff. 2010;32(supple4):677–85.
33.
go back to reference Baker GR, Denis JL, Pomey MP, MacIntosh-Murray A. Effective Governance for quality and patient safety in Canadian healthcare organizations: a report to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute. CHSRF/CPSI: Ottawa; 2010. Baker GR, Denis JL, Pomey MP, MacIntosh-Murray A. Effective Governance for quality and patient safety in Canadian healthcare organizations: a report to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute. CHSRF/CPSI: Ottawa; 2010.
34.
go back to reference Jennings B, Gray BH, Sharpe VA, Fleischman AR. The ethics of hospital trustees. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press; 2004. Jennings B, Gray BH, Sharpe VA, Fleischman AR. The ethics of hospital trustees. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press; 2004.
36.
go back to reference Heclo H. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In: King A, editor. The new american political system. Washington, DC: AEI; 1978. p. 87–124. Heclo H. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In: King A, editor. The new american political system. Washington, DC: AEI; 1978. p. 87–124.
37.
go back to reference Bleiklie I. Interest groups. In: Hawkesworth M, Kogan M, editors. Encyclopaedia of government and politics. London: Routledge; 2004. Bleiklie I. Interest groups. In: Hawkesworth M, Kogan M, editors. Encyclopaedia of government and politics. London: Routledge; 2004.
38.
go back to reference Mannion R, Freeman T, Millar R, Davies HTO. Effective Board governance of safe care: An investigation into the relationship between Trust Board practice and patient safety in NHS Hospital Trusts. NIHR HS&DR. (under review). Mannion R, Freeman T, Millar R, Davies HTO. Effective Board governance of safe care: An investigation into the relationship between Trust Board practice and patient safety in NHS Hospital Trusts. NIHR HS&DR. (under review).
39.
go back to reference Waring JJ. Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1722–31.CrossRefPubMed Waring JJ. Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1722–31.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Currie G, Brown AD. A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK Hospital. Hum Relat. 2003;56(5):563–86.CrossRef Currie G, Brown AD. A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK Hospital. Hum Relat. 2003;56(5):563–86.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Berry JM. Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Political Sci Politics. 2002;35(4):679–82.CrossRef Berry JM. Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Political Sci Politics. 2002;35(4):679–82.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Department of Health. High quality care for all. London: The Stationary Office; 2008. Department of Health. High quality care for all. London: The Stationary Office; 2008.
43.
go back to reference NHS Commissioning Board. Compassion in practice. Leeds: Department of Health; 2012. NHS Commissioning Board. Compassion in practice. Leeds: Department of Health; 2012.
44.
go back to reference Mannion R. Enabling compassionate healthcare: perils, prospects and perspectives. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2014;2(x):1–3. Mannion R. Enabling compassionate healthcare: perils, prospects and perspectives. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2014;2(x):1–3.
45.
go back to reference Veronesi G, Kirkpatrick I, Vallascas F. Clinicians on board: what difference does it make? Soc Sci Med. 2013;77:147–55.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi G, Kirkpatrick I, Vallascas F. Clinicians on board: what difference does it make? Soc Sci Med. 2013;77:147–55.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference House of Commons Public Accounts Select Committee. Ninth report of session 2014–15 into Whistleblowing, HC 593. 2014. House of Commons Public Accounts Select Committee. Ninth report of session 2014–15 into Whistleblowing, HC 593. 2014.
Metadata
Title
Hospital board oversight of quality and safety: a stakeholder analysis exploring the role of trust and intelligence
Authors
Ross Millar
Tim Freeman
Russell Mannion
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0771-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue