Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Identifying and selecting implementation theories, models and frameworks: a qualitative study to inform the development of a decision support tool

Authors: Lisa Strifler, Jan M. Barnsley, Michael Hillmer, Sharon E. Straus

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Implementation theories, models and frameworks offer guidance when implementing and sustaining healthcare evidence-based interventions. However, selection can be challenging given the myriad of potential options. We propose to inform a decision support tool to facilitate the appropriate selection of an implementation theory, model or framework in practice. To inform tool development, this study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to identifying and selecting implementation theories, models and frameworks in research and practice, as well as end-user preferences for features and functions of the proposed tool.

Methods

We used an interpretive descriptive approach to conduct semi-structured interviews with implementation researchers and practitioners in Canada, the United States and Australia. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data were inductively coded by a single investigator with a subset of 20% coded independently by a second investigator and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Twenty-four individuals participated in the study. Categories of barriers/facilitators, to inform tool development, included characteristics of the individual or team conducting implementation and characteristics of the implementation theory, model or framework. Major barriers to selection included inconsistent terminology, poor fit with the implementation context and limited knowledge about and training in existing theories, models and frameworks. Major facilitators to selection included the importance of clear and concise language and evidence that the theory, model or framework was applied in a relevant health setting or context. Participants were enthusiastic about the development of a decision support tool that is user-friendly, accessible and practical. Preferences for tool features included key questions about the implementation intervention or project (e.g., purpose, stage of implementation, intended target for change) and a comprehensive list of relevant theories, models and frameworks to choose from along with a glossary of terms and the contexts in which they were applied.

Conclusions

An easy to use decision support tool that addresses key barriers to selecting an implementation theory, model or framework in practice may be beneficial to individuals who facilitate implementation practice activities. Findings on end-user preferences for tool features and functions will inform tool development and design through a user-centered approach.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Haines ER, Alexis Kirk M, Leeman J, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):124.CrossRef Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Haines ER, Alexis Kirk M, Leeman J, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):124.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Strifler L, Cardoso R, McGowan J, Cogo E, Nincic V, Khan PA, et al. Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100(Complete):92–102.CrossRef Strifler L, Cardoso R, McGowan J, Cogo E, Nincic V, Khan PA, et al. Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100(Complete):92–102.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.CrossRef Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.CrossRef Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJE, Hofmeyer A. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):25–36.CrossRef Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJE, Hofmeyer A. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):25–36.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008.
7.
go back to reference The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG). Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1):4.CrossRef The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG). Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1):4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(3):228.CrossRef Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(3):228.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Birken SA, Rohweder CL, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Scott J, Leeman J, et al. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):143.CrossRef Birken SA, Rohweder CL, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Scott J, Leeman J, et al. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):143.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lynch EA, Mudge A, Knowles S, Kitson AL, Hunter SC, Harvey G. “There is nothing so practical as a good theory”: a pragmatic guide for selecting theoretical approaches for implementation projects. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:857.CrossRef Lynch EA, Mudge A, Knowles S, Kitson AL, Hunter SC, Harvey G. “There is nothing so practical as a good theory”: a pragmatic guide for selecting theoretical approaches for implementation projects. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:857.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T. Using normalization process theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):80.CrossRef May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T. Using normalization process theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):80.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Skolarus TA, Lehmann T, Tabak RG, Harris J, Lecy J, Sales AE. Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):97.CrossRef Skolarus TA, Lehmann T, Tabak RG, Harris J, Lecy J, Sales AE. Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):97.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moore JE, Rashid S, Park JS, Khan S, Straus SE. Longitudinal evaluation of a course to build core competencies in implementation practice. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):106.CrossRef Moore JE, Rashid S, Park JS, Khan S, Straus SE. Longitudinal evaluation of a course to build core competencies in implementation practice. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):106.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Field B, Booth A, Ilott I, Gerrish K. Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9:172.CrossRef Field B, Booth A, Ilott I, Gerrish K. Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9:172.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Center for Research in Implementation Science and Prevention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. Dissemination and implementation in health training guide and workbook. 2013; Available at: http://www.crispebooks.org/. Accessed 8 Jan 2020. Center for Research in Implementation Science and Prevention, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. Dissemination and implementation in health training guide and workbook. 2013; Available at: http://​www.​crispebooks.​org/​. Accessed 8 Jan 2020.
17.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in health care. Moving from evidence to practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2013.CrossRef Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in health care. Moving from evidence to practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2013.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50.CrossRef Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Timmings C, Khan S, Moore JE, Marquez C, Pykal K, Straus SE. Ready, set, change! Development and usability testing of an online readiness for change decision support tool for healthcare organizations. BMC Med Inform and Decis Mak. 2016;16:24.CrossRef Timmings C, Khan S, Moore JE, Marquez C, Pykal K, Straus SE. Ready, set, change! Development and usability testing of an online readiness for change decision support tool for healthcare organizations. BMC Med Inform and Decis Mak. 2016;16:24.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.CrossRef Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kastner M, Straus SE. Application of the knowledge-to-action and Medical Research Council frameworks in the development of an osteoporosis clinical decision support tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(11):1163–70.CrossRef Kastner M, Straus SE. Application of the knowledge-to-action and Medical Research Council frameworks in the development of an osteoporosis clinical decision support tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(11):1163–70.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thorne S. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2016.CrossRef Thorne S. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2016.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Parsons MGJ. A guide to the use of focus groups in health care research: part 1. Contemp Nurse. 2000;9(2):169–80.CrossRef Parsons MGJ. A guide to the use of focus groups in health care research: part 1. Contemp Nurse. 2000;9(2):169–80.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health C. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health C. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRef Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.CrossRef Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Braun VCV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77.CrossRef Braun VCV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Iowa MC, Buckwalter KC, Cullen L, Hanrahan K, Kleiber C, McCarthy AM, et al. Iowa model of evidence-based practice: revisions and validation. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2017;14(3):175–82.CrossRef Iowa MC, Buckwalter KC, Cullen L, Hanrahan K, Kleiber C, McCarthy AM, et al. Iowa model of evidence-based practice: revisions and validation. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2017;14(3):175–82.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRef Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bastani R, Glenn BA, Taylor VM, Chen MS, Nguyen TT, Stewart SL, et al. Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: the health behavior framework. Prev Med. 2010;50(1–2):63–7.CrossRef Bastani R, Glenn BA, Taylor VM, Chen MS, Nguyen TT, Stewart SL, et al. Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: the health behavior framework. Prev Med. 2010;50(1–2):63–7.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mao J, Vredenburg K, Smith PW, Carey T. The state of user-centered design practice. Comm ACM. 2005;48(3):105–9.CrossRef Mao J, Vredenburg K, Smith PW, Carey T. The state of user-centered design practice. Comm ACM. 2005;48(3):105–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Identifying and selecting implementation theories, models and frameworks: a qualitative study to inform the development of a decision support tool
Authors
Lisa Strifler
Jan M. Barnsley
Michael Hillmer
Sharon E. Straus
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01128-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2020 Go to the issue