Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning

Authors: Manuel Huber, Christoph Kurz, Reiner Leidl

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Machine-learning classifiers mostly offer good predictive performance and are increasingly used to support shared decision-making in clinical practice. Focusing on performance and practicability, this study evaluates prediction of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by eight supervised classifiers including a linear model, following hip and knee replacement surgery.

Methods

NHS PRO data (130,945 observations) from April 2015 to April 2017 were used to train and test eight classifiers to predict binary postoperative improvement based on minimal important differences. Area under the receiver operating characteristic, J-statistic and several other metrics were calculated. The dependent outcomes were generic and disease-specific improvement based on the EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as the Oxford Hip and Knee Score (Q score).

Results

The area under the receiver operating characteristic of the best training models was around 0.87 (VAS) and 0.78 (Q score) for hip replacement, while it was around 0.86 (VAS) and 0.70 (Q score) for knee replacement surgery. Extreme gradient boosting, random forests, multistep elastic net and linear model provided the highest overall J-statistics. Based on variable importance, the most important predictors for post-operative outcomes were preoperative VAS, Q score and single Q score dimensions. Sensitivity analysis for hip replacement VAS evaluated the influence of minimal important difference, patient selection criteria as well as additional data years. Together with a small benchmark of the NHS prediction model, robustness of our results was confirmed.

Conclusions

Supervised machine-learning implementations, like extreme gradient boosting, can provide better performance than linear models and should be considered, when high predictive performance is needed. Preoperative VAS, Q score and specific dimensions like limping are the most important predictors for postoperative hip and knee PROMs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.CrossRef Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:6–8.CrossRef Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:6–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017.
4.
go back to reference Wagle NW. Care Redesign 2016: Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. NEJM Catalyst:2016. Wagle NW. Care Redesign 2016: Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. NEJM Catalyst:2016.
5.
go back to reference Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMS. King's Fund, 2010. Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMS. King's Fund, 2010.
6.
go back to reference Nilsson E, Orwelius L, Kristenson M. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers. J Intern Med. 2016;279:141–53.CrossRef Nilsson E, Orwelius L, Kristenson M. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers. J Intern Med. 2016;279:141–53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baumhauer JF. Patient-reported outcomes — are they living up to their potential? N Engl J Med. 2017;377:6–9.CrossRef Baumhauer JF. Patient-reported outcomes — are they living up to their potential? N Engl J Med. 2017;377:6–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eneqvist T, Nemes S, Bulow E, et al. Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement? Int Orthop. 2018;42:273–9.CrossRef Eneqvist T, Nemes S, Bulow E, et al. Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement? Int Orthop. 2018;42:273–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference ShahabiKargar Z, Khanna S, Good N, et al. Predicting procedure duration to improve scheduling of elective surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014.CrossRef ShahabiKargar Z, Khanna S, Good N, et al. Predicting procedure duration to improve scheduling of elective surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kargar ZS, Khanna S, Sattar A. Using prediction to improve elective surgery scheduling. Australas Med J. 2013;6:287–9.CrossRef Kargar ZS, Khanna S, Sattar A. Using prediction to improve elective surgery scheduling. Australas Med J. 2013;6:287–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wong DJN, Oliver CM, Moonesinghe SR. Predicting postoperative morbidity in adult elective surgical patients using the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT). Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:95–105.CrossRef Wong DJN, Oliver CM, Moonesinghe SR. Predicting postoperative morbidity in adult elective surgical patients using the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT). Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:95–105.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Das P, et al. Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major SurgeryQualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:959–81.CrossRef Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Das P, et al. Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major SurgeryQualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:959–81.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference National Joint Registry. Joint replacement statistics. 2017. National Joint Registry. Joint replacement statistics. 2017.
14.
go back to reference Miguel-Hurtado O, Guest R, Stevenage SV, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers and linear/logistic regression to explore the relationship between Hand dimensions and demographic characteristics. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165521.CrossRef Miguel-Hurtado O, Guest R, Stevenage SV, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers and linear/logistic regression to explore the relationship between Hand dimensions and demographic characteristics. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165521.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Seligman B, Tuljapurkar S, Rehkopf D. Machine learning approaches to the social determinants of health in the health and retirement study. SSM - Population Health. 2018;4:95–9.CrossRef Seligman B, Tuljapurkar S, Rehkopf D. Machine learning approaches to the social determinants of health in the health and retirement study. SSM - Population Health. 2018;4:95–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Singal AG, Mukherjee A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Machine learning algorithms outperform conventional regression models in predicting development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1723–30.CrossRef Singal AG, Mukherjee A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Machine learning algorithms outperform conventional regression models in predicting development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1723–30.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rigg J, Lodhi H, Nasuti P. PRM130 - using machine learning to detect patients with undiagnosed rare diseases: an application of support vector machines to a rare oncology disease. Value Health. 2015;18:A705.CrossRef Rigg J, Lodhi H, Nasuti P. PRM130 - using machine learning to detect patients with undiagnosed rare diseases: an application of support vector machines to a rare oncology disease. Value Health. 2015;18:A705.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chen JH, Asch SM. Machine learning and prediction in medicine — beyond the peak of inflated expectations. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2507–9.CrossRef Chen JH, Asch SM. Machine learning and prediction in medicine — beyond the peak of inflated expectations. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2507–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wolpert DH. The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 1996;8:1341–90.CrossRef Wolpert DH. The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 1996;8:1341–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wolpert DH. Macready WG. Santa Fe Institute: No Free Lunch Theorems for Search; 1995. Wolpert DH. Macready WG. Santa Fe Institute: No Free Lunch Theorems for Search; 1995.
21.
go back to reference L’Heureux A, Grolinger K, Elyamany HF, et al. Machine learning with big data: challenges and approaches. IEEE Access. 2017;5:7776–97.CrossRef L’Heureux A, Grolinger K, Elyamany HF, et al. Machine learning with big data: challenges and approaches. IEEE Access. 2017;5:7776–97.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Luo G. PredicT-ML: a tool for automating machine learning model building with big clinical data. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2016;4:5.CrossRef Luo G. PredicT-ML: a tool for automating machine learning model building with big clinical data. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2016;4:5.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference National Health Service. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). 2018. National Health Service. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). 2018.
25.
go back to reference EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy. 1990;16(3):199-208. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
26.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:185–90.CrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:185–90.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63–9.CrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, et al. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321–57.CrossRef Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, et al. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321–57.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Batista GEAPA, Prati RC, Monard MC. A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. SIGKDD Explor Newsl. 2004;6:20–9.CrossRef Batista GEAPA, Prati RC, Monard MC. A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. SIGKDD Explor Newsl. 2004;6:20–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Thornton C, Hutter F, Hoos HH, et al. Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Chicago, Illinois, USA: ACM; 2013.CrossRef Thornton C, Hutter F, Hoos HH, et al. Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Chicago, Illinois, USA: ACM; 2013.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sauer S, Buettner R, Heidenreich T, et al. Mindful machine learning. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2018;34:6–13.CrossRef Sauer S, Buettner R, Heidenreich T, et al. Mindful machine learning. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2018;34:6–13.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. San Francisco, California, USA: ACM; 2016.CrossRef Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. San Francisco, California, USA: ACM; 2016.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Xiao N, Xu Q-S. Multi-step adaptive elastic-net: reducing false positives in high-dimensional variable selection. J Stat Comput Simul. 2015;85:3755–65.CrossRef Xiao N, Xu Q-S. Multi-step adaptive elastic-net: reducing false positives in high-dimensional variable selection. J Stat Comput Simul. 2015;85:3755–65.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by RandomForest; 2001. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by RandomForest; 2001.
40.
go back to reference Haykin S. Neural networks: a Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall PTR, 1998. Haykin S. Neural networks: a Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.
41.
go back to reference Hand DJ, Yu K. Idiot's Bayes: not so stupid after all? International Statistical Review. 2001;69(3):385–98. Hand DJ, Yu K. Idiot's Bayes: not so stupid after all? International Statistical Review. 2001;69(3):385–98.
42.
go back to reference Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1967;13:21–7.CrossRef Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1967;13:21–7.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Stat. 2000;28:337–407.CrossRef Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Stat. 2000;28:337–407.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Steinwart I, Christmann A. Support vector machines. Incorporated: Springer Publishing Company; 2008. Steinwart I, Christmann A. Support vector machines. Incorporated: Springer Publishing Company; 2008.
45.
go back to reference Bradley AP. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn. 1997;30:1145–59.CrossRef Bradley AP. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn. 1997;30:1145–59.CrossRef
46.
47.
go back to reference Kuhn M. Variable importance using the caret package. Kuhn M. Variable importance using the caret package.
49.
go back to reference King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11:171–84.CrossRef King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11:171–84.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102–9.CrossRef Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102–9.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Paulsen A, Roos EM, Pedersen AB, et al. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:39–48.CrossRef Paulsen A, Roos EM, Pedersen AB, et al. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:39–48.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:73–9.CrossRef Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:73–9.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Kruse C, Eiken P, Vestergaard P. Machine learning principles can improve hip fracture prediction. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;100:348–60.CrossRef Kruse C, Eiken P, Vestergaard P. Machine learning principles can improve hip fracture prediction. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;100:348–60.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Taylor RA, Moore CL, Cheung KH, et al. Predicting urinary tract infections in the emergency department with machine learning. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194085.CrossRef Taylor RA, Moore CL, Cheung KH, et al. Predicting urinary tract infections in the emergency department with machine learning. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194085.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Livne M, Boldsen JK, Mikkelsen IK, et al. Boosted tree model reforms multimodal magnetic resonance imaging infarct prediction in acute stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:912–8.CrossRef Livne M, Boldsen JK, Mikkelsen IK, et al. Boosted tree model reforms multimodal magnetic resonance imaging infarct prediction in acute stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:912–8.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Babajide Mustapha I, Saeed F. Bioactive molecule prediction using extreme gradient boosting. Molecules. 2016;21. Babajide Mustapha I, Saeed F. Bioactive molecule prediction using extreme gradient boosting. Molecules. 2016;21.
59.
go back to reference Sheridan RP, Wang WM, Liaw A, et al. Extreme gradient boosting as a method for quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Chem Inf Model. 2016;56:2353–60.CrossRef Sheridan RP, Wang WM, Liaw A, et al. Extreme gradient boosting as a method for quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Chem Inf Model. 2016;56:2353–60.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Mullainathan S, Spiess J. Machine learning: an applied econometric approach. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31:87–106.CrossRef Mullainathan S, Spiess J. Machine learning: an applied econometric approach. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31:87–106.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future — big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1216–9.CrossRef Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future — big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1216–9.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. Points of significance: statistics versus machine learning. Nat Methods. 2018:1–7. Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. Points of significance: statistics versus machine learning. Nat Methods. 2018:1–7.
63.
go back to reference Rose S. Robust machine learning variable importance analyses of medical conditions for health care spending. Health Serv Res. 2018. Rose S. Robust machine learning variable importance analyses of medical conditions for health care spending. Health Serv Res. 2018.
64.
go back to reference Lazzarini N, Runhaar J, Bay-Jensen AC, et al. A machine learning approach for the identification of new biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis development in overweight and obese women. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017;25:2014–21.CrossRef Lazzarini N, Runhaar J, Bay-Jensen AC, et al. A machine learning approach for the identification of new biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis development in overweight and obese women. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017;25:2014–21.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Archer KJ, Kimes RV. Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;52:2249–60.CrossRef Archer KJ, Kimes RV. Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;52:2249–60.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Yao J, Levy-Chapira M, Margaryan M. Checking account activity and credit default risk of enterprises: An application of statistical learning methods. arXiv. 2017. preprint arXiv:1707.00757. Yao J, Levy-Chapira M, Margaryan M. Checking account activity and credit default risk of enterprises: An application of statistical learning methods. arXiv. 2017. preprint arXiv:1707.00757.
67.
go back to reference Tsanas A, Xifara A. Accurate quantitative estimation of energy performance of residential buildings using statistical machine learning tools. Energ Buildings. 2012;49:560–7.CrossRef Tsanas A, Xifara A. Accurate quantitative estimation of energy performance of residential buildings using statistical machine learning tools. Energ Buildings. 2012;49:560–7.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Goetz J, Brenning A, Petschko H, et al. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci. 2015;81:1–11.CrossRef Goetz J, Brenning A, Petschko H, et al. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci. 2015;81:1–11.CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Vogl M, Wilkesmann R, Lausmann C, et al. The impact of preoperative patient characteristics on health states after total hip replacement and related satisfaction thresholds: a cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:108.CrossRef Vogl M, Wilkesmann R, Lausmann C, et al. The impact of preoperative patient characteristics on health states after total hip replacement and related satisfaction thresholds: a cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:108.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Schilling CG, Dowsey MM, Petrie DJ, et al. Predicting the Long-Term Gains in Health-Related Quality of Life After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:395–401 e2.CrossRef Schilling CG, Dowsey MM, Petrie DJ, et al. Predicting the Long-Term Gains in Health-Related Quality of Life After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:395–401 e2.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Sprague S, Bhandari M, Heetveld MJ, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life, hip function, and health utility after operative management of femoral neck fractures. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b:361–9.CrossRef Sprague S, Bhandari M, Heetveld MJ, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life, hip function, and health utility after operative management of femoral neck fractures. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b:361–9.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Gutacker N, Street A. Use of large-scale HRQoL datasets to generate individualised predictions and inform patients about the likely benefit of surgery. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:2497–505.CrossRef Gutacker N, Street A. Use of large-scale HRQoL datasets to generate individualised predictions and inform patients about the likely benefit of surgery. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:2497–505.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Zeileis A, et al. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:25–5. Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Zeileis A, et al. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:25–5.
74.
go back to reference Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news. 2002;2:18–22. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news. 2002;2:18–22.
75.
go back to reference Mandzuk LL, McMillan DE, Bohm ER. A longitudinal study of quality of life and functional status in total hip and total knee replacement patients. International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing. 2015;19:102–13.CrossRef Mandzuk LL, McMillan DE, Bohm ER. A longitudinal study of quality of life and functional status in total hip and total knee replacement patients. International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing. 2015;19:102–13.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Liebs TR, Herzberg W, Ruther W, et al. Quality-adjusted life years gained by hip and knee replacement surgery and its aftercare. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:691–700.CrossRef Liebs TR, Herzberg W, Ruther W, et al. Quality-adjusted life years gained by hip and knee replacement surgery and its aftercare. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:691–700.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Selten EM, Geenen R, van der Laan WH, et al. Hierarchical structure and importance of patients' reasons for treatment choices in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a concept mapping study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56:271–8.CrossRef Selten EM, Geenen R, van der Laan WH, et al. Hierarchical structure and importance of patients' reasons for treatment choices in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a concept mapping study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56:271–8.CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Feng Y, Parkin D, Devlin NJ. Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:977–89.CrossRef Feng Y, Parkin D, Devlin NJ. Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:977–89.CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Prodinger B, Taylor P. Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:87.CrossRef Prodinger B, Taylor P. Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:87.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Singh JA, Lewallen D. Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28:1419–30.CrossRef Singh JA, Lewallen D. Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28:1419–30.CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Otero JE, Graves CM, Gao Y, et al. Patient-reported allergies predict worse outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:2746–9.CrossRef Otero JE, Graves CM, Gao Y, et al. Patient-reported allergies predict worse outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:2746–9.CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Xu S, Chen JY, Lo NN, et al. The influence of obesity on functional outcome and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b:579–83.CrossRef Xu S, Chen JY, Lo NN, et al. The influence of obesity on functional outcome and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b:579–83.CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Snell DL, Hipango J, Sinnott KA, et al. Rehabilitation after total joint replacement: a scoping study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1718–31. Snell DL, Hipango J, Sinnott KA, et al. Rehabilitation after total joint replacement: a scoping study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1718–31.
84.
go back to reference Pickard AS, Hung YT, Lin FJ, et al. Patient experience-based value sets: are they stable? Med Care. 2017;55:979–84.PubMed Pickard AS, Hung YT, Lin FJ, et al. Patient experience-based value sets: are they stable? Med Care. 2017;55:979–84.PubMed
85.
go back to reference Olomu AB, Corser WD, Stommel M, et al. Do self-report and medical record comorbidity data predict longitudinal functional capacity and quality of life health outcomes similarly? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:398–8. Olomu AB, Corser WD, Stommel M, et al. Do self-report and medical record comorbidity data predict longitudinal functional capacity and quality of life health outcomes similarly? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:398–8.
86.
go back to reference van den Akker M, van Steenkiste B, Krutwagen E, et al. Disease or no disease? Disagreement on diagnoses between self-reports and medical records of adult patients. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21:45–51.CrossRef van den Akker M, van Steenkiste B, Krutwagen E, et al. Disease or no disease? Disagreement on diagnoses between self-reports and medical records of adult patients. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21:45–51.CrossRef
87.
go back to reference Ye F, Moon DH, Carpenter WR, et al. Comparison of patient report and medical records of comorbidities: results from a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer. JAMA Oncology. 2017;3:1035–42.CrossRef Ye F, Moon DH, Carpenter WR, et al. Comparison of patient report and medical records of comorbidities: results from a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer. JAMA Oncology. 2017;3:1035–42.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning
Authors
Manuel Huber
Christoph Kurz
Reiner Leidl
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0731-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2019 Go to the issue