Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers

Authors: Trine Stub, Sara A. Quandt, Thomas A. Arcury, Joanne C. Sandberg, Agnete E. Kristoffersen

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Effective interdisciplinary communication is important to achieve better quality in health care. The aims of this study were to compare conventional and complementary providers’ experience of communication about complementary therapies and conventional medicine with their cancer patients, and to investigate how they experience interdisciplinary communication and cooperation.

Method

This study analyzed data from a self-administrated questionnaire. A total of 606 different health care providers, from four counties in Norway, completed the questionnaire. The survey was developed to describe aspects of the communication pattern among oncology doctors, nurses, family physicians and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, massage therapists and reflexologists/zone-therapists). Between-group differences were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and Fisher’s exact tests. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Result

Conventional providers and complementary therapists had different patterns of communication with their cancer patients regarding complementary therapies. While complementary therapists advised their patients to apply both complementary and conventional modalities, medical doctors were less supportive of their patients’ use of complementary therapies. Of conventional providers, nurses expressed more positive attitudes toward complementary therapies. Opportunities to improve communication between conventional and complementary providers were most strongly supported by complementary providers and nurses; medical doctors were less supportive of such attempts. A number of doctors showed lack of respect for complementary therapists, but asked for more research, guidelines for complementary modalities and training in conventional medicine for complementary therapists.

Conclusion

For better quality of care, greater communication about complementary therapy use is needed between cancer patients and their conventional and complementary providers. In addition, more communication between conventional and complementary providers is needed. Nurses may have a crucial role in facilitating communication, as they are positive toward complementary therapies and they have more direct communication with patients about their treatment preferences.
Literature
1.
Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:403–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Epstein RM, Street LS. The values and value of patient-centered care. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2011;9(2):100–3.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Williams PT, Peet G. Differences in the value of clinical information: referring physicians versus consulting specialists. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994;7(4):292–302.PubMed
4.
O’Malley AS, Reschovsky JD. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(1):56–65.PubMed
5.
Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients, patients talking with doctors. Auburn House: Westport; 1992.
6.
Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(7):903–18.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Epstein RM, Street LS: Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care. National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health 2007, No.07.6225.
8.
Blasi ZD, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757–62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Salamonsen A. Doctor-patient communication and cancer patient's choice of alternative therapies as supplement or alternative to conventional care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(1):70–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ben-Arye E, Scharf M, Frenkel M. How should complementary practitioners and physicians communicate? A cross-sectional study from Israel. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2007;20(6):565–71.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Schiff E, Frenkel M, Shilo M, Levy M, Schachter L, Freifeld Y, et al. Bridging the physician and CAM practitioner communication gap: suggested framework for communication between physicians and CAM practitioners based on a cross professional survey from Israel. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):188–93.CrossRefPubMed
13.
LOV-1999-07-02-64 Lov om helsepersonell m.v. (helsepersonelloven- hlspl) English: Act 1999–07–02-64. Act relating to health personnel etc. In.; 1999.
14.
LOV-2003-06-27-64 Lov om alternativ behandling av sykdom mv; English Act relating to the alternative treatment of disease, illness, etc. In., 2002–2003 edn; 2003.
15.
Peat J. Health science research. A handbook of quantitative methods. London: SAGE Publications; 2002.
16.
Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Kristoffersen AE, Musial F, et al. Perception of risk and communication among conventional and complementary health care providers involving cancer patients’ use of complementary therapies: a literature review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16(1):1–14.CrossRef
17.
Dillman DA, Smuty JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys. The tailored Design method. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2009.
18.
Morse JM, Richards L. Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousand oaks (CA). London: Sage Publications; 2002.
19.
Ben-Arye E, Visser A. The role of health care communication in the development of complementary and integrative medicine. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:363–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Mackereth P, Carter A, Parkin S, Stringer J, Caress A, Todd C, et al. Complementary therapists’ training and cancer care: a multi-site study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(5):330–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mackereth P, Carter A, Parkin S, Stringer J, Roberts D, Long A, et al. Complementary therapist's motivation to work in cancer/supportive and palliative care: a multi-centre case study. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2009;15(3):161–5.CrossRef
22.
Risberg T, Kolstad A, Bremnes Y, Holte H, Wist EA, Mella O, et al. Knowledge of and attitudes toward complementary and alternative therapies: a national multicentre study of oncology professionals in Norway. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:529–35.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Maha N, Shaw A. Academic doctor's views of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role within the NHS: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007;7(17):1–11.
24.
Molassiotis A, Scott J, Kearney N, Pud D, Magri M, Selvekerova S. Complementary and alternative medicine use in breast cancer patients in Europe. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(3):260–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lengacher CA, Bennett MP, Kip KE, Gonzalez L, et al. Relief of symptoms, side effects, and psychological distress through use of complementary and alternative medicine in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006;33(1):97–104.CrossRefPubMed
26.
The AM, Hak T, Koëter G, van der Wal G. Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 2000;321(7273):1376–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Lee Char SJ, Evans LR, Malvar GL, White DB. A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;7:905–9.CrossRef
28.
King N, Balneaves LG, Levin GT, Nguyen T, Nation JG, Card C, et al. Surveys of cancer patients and cancer health care providers regarding complementary therapy use, communication, and information needs. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2015;14(6):515–24.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Klimenko E, Julliard K. Communication between CAM and mainstream medicine: Delphi panel perspectives. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2007;13(1):46–52.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Richardson P. Assessment and implementation of spirituality and religiosity in cancer care. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(4):E150–5.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Broom A, Adams J. Oncology clinician's accounts of discussing complementary and alternative medicine with their patients. Health: An interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. 2009;13:317–36.CrossRef
32.
Barrett B, Marchand L, Scheder J, Appelbaum D, Chapman M, Jacobs C, et al. Bridging the gap between conventional and alternative medicine. J of Fam Pract. 2000;49(3):234–9.
33.
Bordens KS, Abbott BB. Research Design and methods. A process approach. fifth edition ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2002.
34.
Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(3):913–30.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers
Authors
Trine Stub
Sara A. Quandt
Thomas A. Arcury
Joanne C. Sandberg
Agnete E. Kristoffersen
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1814-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Effects of Bu Shen Yi sui capsule on NogoA/NgR and its signaling pathways RhoA/ROCK in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Research article

Antibacterial and antibiotic resistance modulatory activities of leaves and bark extracts of Recinodindron heudelotii (Euphorbiaceae) against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Research article

The protective effect of fermented Curcuma longa L. on memory dysfunction in oxidative stress-induced C6 gliomal cells, proinflammatory-activated BV2 microglial cells, and scopolamine-induced amnesia model in mice

Research article

Practitioners’ perspectives on evaluating treatment outcomes in traditional Chinese medicine

Research article

Effect of ginseng extract on the TGF-β1 signaling pathway in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats

Research article

Is cytotoxicity a determinant of the different in vitro and in vivo effects of bioactives?