Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model?

Authors: Galvin Sim Siang Lin, Wen Wu Tan, Hasnah Hashim, Chan Choong Foong

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Feedback is regarded as a key component of formative assessment and one of the elements with the greatest impact on students’ academic learning. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare students’ perceptions of the use of two feedback models, namely feedback sandwich and Ask-Tell-Ask (ATA), in teaching dental materials science courses.

Methods

All undergraduate second-year dental students were invited to participate in the dental materials science practical session and were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (feedback) sandwich and Group 2 (ATA). The session began with the teacher giving a short briefing on the commonly used dental materials, followed by a short demonstration of the manipulation of those materials. Students were then allowed to mix and manipulate the materials, and teachers provided feedback accordingly. At the end of the session, 16 close-ended (five-point Likert scales) and an open-ended questionnaire were distributed to students to evaluate their perceptions of the feedback given. Internal reliability of the questionnaire items was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Mean feedback scores were analysed using an independent t-test with ANCOVA for controlling gender and ethnicity. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative data.

Results

Sixty-nine students participated in the present study with the majority being females (72.5%) and Chinese (79.7%). Cronbach’s alpha analysis suggested removing three Likert-scale items, with the remaining 13 items being accepted. Generally, no significant difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.197), but three items were found to be significant (p < 0.05), with higher mean scores in the feedback sandwich group. Moreover, no significant difference was noted between the two feedback models (p = 0.325) when controlling gender and ethnicity. The open-ended question showed that students in the feedback sandwich group expressed greater positive perceptions.

Conclusion

Although students generally had positive perceptions of both feedback models, they tended to favour the feedback sandwich. Neither gender nor ethnicity affected the students’ perceptions of the two feedback models.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chuenjitwongsa S, Oliver RG, Bullock AD. Competence, competency-based education, and undergraduate dental education: a discussion paper. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed Chuenjitwongsa S, Oliver RG, Bullock AD. Competence, competency-based education, and undergraduate dental education: a discussion paper. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yip HK, Smales RJ, Newsome PR, Chu FC, Chow TW. Competency-based education in a clinical course in conservative dentistry. Br Dent J. 2001;191(9):517–22.CrossRefPubMed Yip HK, Smales RJ, Newsome PR, Chu FC, Chow TW. Competency-based education in a clinical course in conservative dentistry. Br Dent J. 2001;191(9):517–22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676–82.CrossRefPubMed Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676–82.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference French JC, Colbert CY, Pien LC, Dannefer EF, Taylor CA. Targeted feedback in the milestones era: utilization of the Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model to promote reflection and self-assessment. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):e274-279.CrossRefPubMed French JC, Colbert CY, Pien LC, Dannefer EF, Taylor CA. Targeted feedback in the milestones era: utilization of the Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model to promote reflection and self-assessment. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):e274-279.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tekian A, Watling CJ, Roberts TE, Steinert Y, Norcini J. Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1245–9.CrossRefPubMed Tekian A, Watling CJ, Roberts TE, Steinert Y, Norcini J. Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1245–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Havnes A, Smith K, Dysthe O, Ludvigsen K. Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Stud Educ Eval. 2012;38(1):21–7.CrossRef Havnes A, Smith K, Dysthe O, Ludvigsen K. Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Stud Educ Eval. 2012;38(1):21–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vijayan K. Feedback in medical education: a neglected domain. SBV J Basic Clin Appl Health Sci. 2022;6(1):16–7.CrossRef Vijayan K. Feedback in medical education: a neglected domain. SBV J Basic Clin Appl Health Sci. 2022;6(1):16–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Alfehaid LS, Qotineh A, Alsuhebany N, Alharbi S, Almodaimegh H. The perceptions and attitudes of undergraduate healthcare sciences students of feedback: a qualitative study. Health Prof Educ. 2018;4(3):186–97. Alfehaid LS, Qotineh A, Alsuhebany N, Alharbi S, Almodaimegh H. The perceptions and attitudes of undergraduate healthcare sciences students of feedback: a qualitative study. Health Prof Educ. 2018;4(3):186–97.
9.
go back to reference Shah DY, Dadpe AM, Kalra DD, Garcha VP. Videotaped feedback method to enhance learning in preclinical operative dentistry: an experimental study. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(12):1461–6.CrossRefPubMed Shah DY, Dadpe AM, Kalra DD, Garcha VP. Videotaped feedback method to enhance learning in preclinical operative dentistry: an experimental study. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(12):1461–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Davis S, Duane B, Loxley A, Quigley D. The evaluation of an evidence-based model of feedback implemented on an undergraduate dental clinical learning environment. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davis S, Duane B, Loxley A, Quigley D. The evaluation of an evidence-based model of feedback implemented on an undergraduate dental clinical learning environment. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ash MK. Mary Kay on People Management. New York: Grand Central Publishing; 1981. Ash MK. Mary Kay on People Management. New York: Grand Central Publishing; 1981.
13.
go back to reference Schwenk TL, Whitman N. The Physician as Teacher. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987. Schwenk TL, Whitman N. The Physician as Teacher. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987.
14.
go back to reference Henley AJ, DiGennaro Reed FD. Should you order the feedback sandwich? Efficacy of feedback sequence and timing. J Organ Behav Manag. 2015;35(3–4):321–35. Henley AJ, DiGennaro Reed FD. Should you order the feedback sandwich? Efficacy of feedback sequence and timing. J Organ Behav Manag. 2015;35(3–4):321–35.
15.
go back to reference Parkes J, Abercrombie S, McCarty T. Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(3):397–407.CrossRefPubMed Parkes J, Abercrombie S, McCarty T. Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(3):397–407.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Saeed M, Isnani AC, Khan SA, Khamis N. Students’ Feedback about Feedback; Have our PBL tutors started the shift towards a dialogic Ask-Tell-Ask approach? Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):1698–702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saeed M, Isnani AC, Khan SA, Khamis N. Students’ Feedback about Feedback; Have our PBL tutors started the shift towards a dialogic Ask-Tell-Ask approach? Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):1698–702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lin GSS, Tan WW, Afrashtehfar KI. Exploring the learning experience of high-performing preclinical undergraduate dental students: a qualitative study. Educ Sci. 2022;12(11):801.CrossRef Lin GSS, Tan WW, Afrashtehfar KI. Exploring the learning experience of high-performing preclinical undergraduate dental students: a qualitative study. Educ Sci. 2022;12(11):801.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gali S, Shetty V, Murthy NS, Marimuthu P. Bridging the gap in 1(st) year dental material curriculum: a 3 year randomized cross over trial. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(3):244–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gali S, Shetty V, Murthy NS, Marimuthu P. Bridging the gap in 1(st) year dental material curriculum: a 3 year randomized cross over trial. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(3):244–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Marambe KN, Edussuriya DH, Jayawickrama D. Feedback provided by clinical teachers during undergraduate medical training: a Sri Lankan experience. Asia Pacific Scholar. 2020;5(3):20–7.CrossRef Marambe KN, Edussuriya DH, Jayawickrama D. Feedback provided by clinical teachers during undergraduate medical training: a Sri Lankan experience. Asia Pacific Scholar. 2020;5(3):20–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Geçkin V. Do gender differences affect foreign language anxiety and preferences for oral corrective feedback? J Theoretical Educ Sci. 2020;13(3):591–608. Geçkin V. Do gender differences affect foreign language anxiety and preferences for oral corrective feedback? J Theoretical Educ Sci. 2020;13(3):591–608.
21.
go back to reference Gonzalez E, Parkes J. Perceptions and clinical applications of feedback type. J Dent Sci Res Ther. 2019;3(1):1–9.CrossRef Gonzalez E, Parkes J. Perceptions and clinical applications of feedback type. J Dent Sci Res Ther. 2019;3(1):1–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bing-You R, Ramesh S, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Ward D, Blanco M. Trainees’ perceptions of feedback: validity evidence for two FEEDME (Feedback in Medical Education) instruments. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(2):162–72.CrossRefPubMed Bing-You R, Ramesh S, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Ward D, Blanco M. Trainees’ perceptions of feedback: validity evidence for two FEEDME (Feedback in Medical Education) instruments. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(2):162–72.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Prastiyani NHN, Felaza E, Findyartini A. Exploration of constructive feedback practices in dental education chairside teaching: a case study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24(3):580–9.CrossRefPubMed Prastiyani NHN, Felaza E, Findyartini A. Exploration of constructive feedback practices in dental education chairside teaching: a case study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24(3):580–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Baldwin LJ, Jones CM, Hulme J, Owen A. Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training: an open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms. Resuscitation. 2015;96:199–207.CrossRefPubMed Baldwin LJ, Jones CM, Hulme J, Owen A. Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training: an open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms. Resuscitation. 2015;96:199–207.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Deci EL, Ryan RM: Self-determination theory. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vol 1. edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd; 2012: 416–436. Deci EL, Ryan RM: Self-determination theory. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vol 1. edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd; 2012: 416–436.
27.
go back to reference Mabbe E, Soenens B, De Muynck GJ, Vansteenkiste M. The impact of feedback valence and communication style on intrinsic motivation in middle childhood: Experimental evidence and generalization across individual differences. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018;170:134–60.CrossRefPubMed Mabbe E, Soenens B, De Muynck GJ, Vansteenkiste M. The impact of feedback valence and communication style on intrinsic motivation in middle childhood: Experimental evidence and generalization across individual differences. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018;170:134–60.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J Res Pers. 1985;19(2):109–34.CrossRef Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J Res Pers. 1985;19(2):109–34.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Burgers C, Eden A, van Engelenburg MD, Buningh S. How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:94–103.CrossRef Burgers C, Eden A, van Engelenburg MD, Buningh S. How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:94–103.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Feng Y, Jonathan Ye H, Yu Y, Yang C, Cui T. Gamification artifacts and crowdsourcing participation: Examining the mediating role of intrinsic motivations. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;81:124–36.CrossRef Feng Y, Jonathan Ye H, Yu Y, Yang C, Cui T. Gamification artifacts and crowdsourcing participation: Examining the mediating role of intrinsic motivations. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;81:124–36.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Dohrenwend A. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Fam Pract Manag. 2002;9(10):43–6.PubMed Dohrenwend A. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Fam Pract Manag. 2002;9(10):43–6.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM. Developing the teaching instinct, 1: Feedback. Med Teach. 2002;24(3):245–8.CrossRefPubMed Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM. Developing the teaching instinct, 1: Feedback. Med Teach. 2002;24(3):245–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. To the point: medical education reviews–providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):508–13.CrossRefPubMed Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. To the point: medical education reviews–providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):508–13.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gaster B, Edwards K, Trinidad SB, Gallagher TH, Braddock CH 3rd. Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(10):661–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gaster B, Edwards K, Trinidad SB, Gallagher TH, Braddock CH 3rd. Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(10):661–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference McInerney DM. The motivational profiles and perceptions of schooling of Asian students in Australia. Kedah: UUM College of Arts and Sciences; 2006. McInerney DM. The motivational profiles and perceptions of schooling of Asian students in Australia. Kedah: UUM College of Arts and Sciences; 2006.
36.
go back to reference Bear GG, Chen D, Mantz LS, Yang C, Huang X, Shiomi K. Differences in classroom removals and use of praise and rewards in American, Chinese, and Japanese schools. Teach Teach Educ. 2016;53:41–50.CrossRef Bear GG, Chen D, Mantz LS, Yang C, Huang X, Shiomi K. Differences in classroom removals and use of praise and rewards in American, Chinese, and Japanese schools. Teach Teach Educ. 2016;53:41–50.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Aguillon SM, Siegmund GF, Petipas RH, Drake AG, Cotner S, Ballen CJ. Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020;19(2):12.CrossRef Aguillon SM, Siegmund GF, Petipas RH, Drake AG, Cotner S, Ballen CJ. Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020;19(2):12.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kumar LR, Voralu K, Pani SP, Sethuraman KR. Predominant Learning styles adopted by AIMST University students in Malaysia. South-East Asian J Med Educ. 2009;3(1):37-46. Kumar LR, Voralu K, Pani SP, Sethuraman KR. Predominant Learning styles adopted by AIMST University students in Malaysia. South-East Asian J Med Educ. 2009;3(1):37-46.
39.
go back to reference Lobos CC, Yaacob A. Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Perceptions on Oral Corrective Feedback. Int Res J Modern Eng Technol Sci. 2022;4(6):4945–9. Lobos CC, Yaacob A. Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Perceptions on Oral Corrective Feedback. Int Res J Modern Eng Technol Sci. 2022;4(6):4945–9.
40.
41.
go back to reference Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):685–95.CrossRefPubMed Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):685–95.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Ward M, Gruppen L, Regehr G. Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2002;7:63–80.CrossRef Ward M, Gruppen L, Regehr G. Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2002;7:63–80.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Simon JR, Howard JH, Howard DV. Adult age differences in learning from positive and negative probabilistic feedback. Neuropsychology. 2010;24(4):534–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simon JR, Howard JH, Howard DV. Adult age differences in learning from positive and negative probabilistic feedback. Neuropsychology. 2010;24(4):534–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Weallans J, Roberts C, Hamilton S, Parker S. Guidance for providing effective feedback in clinical supervision in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(1156):138–49.CrossRefPubMed Weallans J, Roberts C, Hamilton S, Parker S. Guidance for providing effective feedback in clinical supervision in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(1156):138–49.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model?
Authors
Galvin Sim Siang Lin
Wen Wu Tan
Hasnah Hashim
Chan Choong Foong
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03141-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue