Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems

Authors: Yousef A AlJehani, Jagan K Baskaradoss, Amrita Geevarghese, Marey A AlShehry, Pekka K Vallittu

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the increase in demand for cosmetics and esthetics, resin composite restorations and all-ceramic restorations have become an important treatment alternative. Taking into consideration the large number of prosthodontic and adhesive resins currently available, the strength and durability of these materials needs to be evaluated. This laboratory study presents the shear bond strengths of a range of veneering resin composites bonded to all-ceramic core material using different adhesive resins.

Methods

Alumina ceramic specimens (Techceram Ltd, Shipley, UK) were assigned to three groups. Three types of commercially available prosthodontic resin composites [BelleGlass®, (BG, Kerr, CA, USA), Sinfony® (SF, 3 M ESPE, Dental Products, Germany), and GC Gradia® (GCG, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan)] were bonded to the alumina substrate using four different adhesive resins. Half the specimens per group (N = 40) were stored dry for 24 hours, the remaining were stored for 30 days in water. The bonding strength, so-called shear bond strengths between composite resin and alumina substrate were measured. Data were analysed statistically and variations in bond strength within each group were additionally evaluated by calculating the Weibull modulus.

Results

Bond strengths were influenced by the brand of prosthodontic resin composites. Shear bond strengths of material combinations varied from 24.17 ± 3.72–10.15 ± 3.69 MPa and 21.20 ± 4.64–7.50 ± 4.22 at 24 h and 30 days, respectively. BG resin composite compared with the other resin composites provided the strongest bond with alumina substrate (p < 0.01). SF resin composite was found to have a lower bond strength than the other composites. The Weibull moduli were highest for BG, which was bonded by using Optibond Solo Plus adhesive resin at 24 h and 30 days. There was no effect of storage time and adhesive brand on bond strength.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, the shear bond strengths of composite resins to alumina substrate are related to the composite resins.
Literature
1.
Jun SK, Kim DA, Goo HJ, Lee HH. Investigation of the correlation between the different mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):48–57.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
Valittu P, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. J Prosth Dent. 2000;84:413–8.CrossRef
5.
Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19(8):725–31.CrossRefPubMed
6.
O'Brien W. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2002. p. 12–23.
7.
Tam LE, McComb D. Shear bond strengths of resin luting cements to laboratory-made composite resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(3):314–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):268–74.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(2):128–33.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kienanen P, Alander P, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Bonding of ceramic insert to a laboratory particle filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005;63(5):272–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007;65(4):241–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Attia A, Kern M. Long-term resin bonding to zirconia ceramic with a new universal primer. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(5):319–27.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Liu D, Pow EH, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP. Evaluation of four surface coating treatments for resin to zirconia bonding. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32:300–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ohlmann B, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M, Schwarz S, Gabbert O. All-ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial dentures: preliminary results from a clinical study. J Dent. 2008;36(9):692–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):64–71.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Heikkinen TT, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Long term water storage deteriorates bonding of composite resin to alumina and zirconia short communication. Open Dent J. 2013;7:123–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Örtengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter I. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(12):1106–15.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Palmer D, Barco M, Billy E. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(3):325–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Harrison A, Moores GE. Influence of abrasive particle size and contact stress on the wear rate of dental restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1985;1(1):15–8.CrossRef
20.
Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res. 1997;76:1298–307.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Cattell M, Clarke R, Lynch E. The transverse strength, reliability and microstructural features of four dental ceramics. J Dent. 1997;25:339–407.CrossRef
22.
Ban S, Anusavice K. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1791–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995;11(2):117–25.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131 suppl 1:20S–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira P, Kanemura N, Morigamui M, Tagami J, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78(4):906–11.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1998;14(6):394–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78–93.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Craig R, Powers J. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. Mosby; St. Louis. 2002; 85
29.
Tantbirojn D, Cheng Y-S, Versluis A, Hodges J, Douglas W. Nominal shear or fracture mechanica in the assessment of composite-dentin adhesion? J Dent Res. 2000;79:41–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Sudsaniam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? Adhesive Dent. 1999;1:57–67.
31.
El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):575–83.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Chadwick R, Mason A, Sharp W. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems-what are we really testing? J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:610–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1591–6.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Van Noort R, Cardew G, Howard I, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res. 1991;70:889–93.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater. 1992;8:158–61.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Oh W, Shen C, Al E. Wetting characteristic of ceramic to water and adhesive resin. J Prosth Dent. 2002;88:616–21.CrossRef
37.
Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer H-C. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):211–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosth Dent. 1998;80:450–6.CrossRef
39.
Fortin D, Swift E, SDenehy G, Reinhardt J. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1994;10:253–8.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Barkmeier W, Suh B, Cooley R. Shear bond strength to dentin and NI-Cr-Be Alloy with the All-Bond Universal Adhesive system. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3:148–53.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Viwattanatipa N, Jermwiwatkul W, Chintavalakorn R, Kanchanavasita W. Weibull analysis of bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes bonded to resin composite surface with various techniques. Orthodontic Waves. 2010;69(2):66–74.CrossRef
42.
Cooley R, Tseng E, Evans J. Evaluation of a 4-META porcelain repair system. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3:11–3.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Gregory W, Moss S. Effects of heterogeneous layers of composite and time on composite repair of porcelain. Oper Dent. 1990;15:18–22.PubMed
44.
Al-Ahdal K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in composition and temperature. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):517–24.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Diamantopoulou S, Papazoglou E, Margaritis V, Lynch CD, Kakaboura A. Change of optical properties of contemporary resin composites after one week and one month water ageing. J Dent. 2013;41 Suppl 5:e62–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems
Authors
Yousef A AlJehani
Jagan K Baskaradoss
Amrita Geevarghese
Marey A AlShehry
Pekka K Vallittu
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0041-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Oral Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis

Research article

Clinical, microbiological, and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study

Research article

The activation of pyrin domain-containing-3 inflammasome depends on lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis and extracellular adenosine triphosphate in cultured oral epithelial cells

Research article

Dental fear and its possible relationship with periodontal status in Chinese adults: a preliminary study

Research article

The effect of motivational interviewing on oral healthcare knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of preschool children: an exploratory cluster randomised controlled study

Research article

Access to dental public services by disabled persons