Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Surgical management of large adrenal tumors: impact of different laparoscopic approaches and resection methods on perioperative and long-term outcomes

Authors: Wei Chen, Yong Liang, Wei Lin, Guang-Qing Fu, Zhi-Wei Ma

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The indication of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) was extended with the retroperitoneal approach and has been wildly accepted and technologically matured. However, the management of large adrenal tumors via this approach still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive analysis on the minimally invasive surgical management of larger adrenal tumors.

Methods

A total of 78 patients with large adrenal tumors (> 5 cm) and 97 patients with smaller adrenal tumors (< 5 cm) were enrolled in this study. The patient characteristics were preferentially analyzed. The intra-operative and postoperative indicators were compared between those who underwent RLA and those who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TLA); the intra-operative and postoperative indicators were also compared between the large tumor group and smaller tumor group of those who underwent RLA. Furthermore, the analyses of partial RLA were focused on the perioperative indicators and follow-up results.

Results

RLA was superior to TLA in terms of operation time (98.71 ± 32.30 min vs. 124.36 ± 34.62 min, respectively, P = 0.001), hospitalization duration (7.43 ± 2.82 days vs. 8.91 ± 3.40 days, respectively, P = 0.04), duration of drain (4.83 ± 0.37 days vs. 3.94 ± 2.21 days, respectively, P = 0.02), first oral intake (2.82 ± 0.71 days vs. 1.90 ± 0.83 days, respectively, P < 0.001) and time to ambulation (3.89 ± 1.64 days vs. 2.61 ± 1.42 days, respectively, P < 0.001). Further analyses of the RLA patients demonstrated that the larger tumor (> 5 cm) group showed superior results for the intraoperative indicators than the smaller tumor (< 5 cm) group (P < 0.05), while the results for the postoperative indicators between the two tumor size groups were similar (P > 0.05). Data confirmed that the partial resection method was superior to the total resection method from the perspective of the hormone supplement (0% vs. 48.15%, P = 0.002). The 2-year recurrence-free rates were 92.60 and 92.86% for the total and partial RLA resection methods, respectively (P = 0.97). The partial RLA resection method had a similar complete remission rate as the total RLA resection method (96.30% vs. 100%, respectively, P = 0.47).

Conclusion

Both RLA and TLA seem to provide similar effects for the surgical management of large adrenal tumors. However, partial RLA resection should be considered for the management of benign tumors to reduce the hormone supplement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen W, Li F, Chen D, Zhu Y, He C, Du Y, Tan W. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in adrenal tumor: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(2):121–7.CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Li F, Chen D, Zhu Y, He C, Du Y, Tan W. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in adrenal tumor: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(2):121–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tobias-Machado M, Rincon Rios F, Tulio Lasmar M, Tristao R, Herminio Forseto P Jr, Vaz Juliano R, Wroclawski ER. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy as a minimally invasive option for the treatment of adrenal tumors. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia. 2006;59(1):49–54.PubMed Tobias-Machado M, Rincon Rios F, Tulio Lasmar M, Tristao R, Herminio Forseto P Jr, Vaz Juliano R, Wroclawski ER. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy as a minimally invasive option for the treatment of adrenal tumors. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia. 2006;59(1):49–54.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Suzuki K. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: retroperitoneal approach. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(1):85–95.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki K. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: retroperitoneal approach. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(1):85–95.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gasman D, Droupy S, Koutani A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Chassagnon J, Chopin DK, Abbou CC. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 1998;159(6):1816–20.CrossRefPubMed Gasman D, Droupy S, Koutani A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Chassagnon J, Chopin DK, Abbou CC. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 1998;159(6):1816–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mohammadi-Fallah MR, Mehdizadeh A, Badalzadeh A, Izadseresht B, Dadkhah N, Barbod A, Babaie M, Hamedanchi S. Comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(4):362–6.CrossRefPubMed Mohammadi-Fallah MR, Mehdizadeh A, Badalzadeh A, Izadseresht B, Dadkhah N, Barbod A, Babaie M, Hamedanchi S. Comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(4):362–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eichhorn-Wharry LI, Talpos GB, Rubinfeld I. Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: another look at outcome using the Clavien classification system. Surgery. 2012;152(6):1090–5.CrossRefPubMed Eichhorn-Wharry LI, Talpos GB, Rubinfeld I. Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: another look at outcome using the Clavien classification system. Surgery. 2012;152(6):1090–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wang HS, Li CC, Chou YH, Wang CJ, Wu WJ, Huang CH. Comparison of laparoscopic adrenalectomy with open surgery for adrenal tumors. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009;25(8):438–44.CrossRefPubMed Wang HS, Li CC, Chou YH, Wang CJ, Wu WJ, Huang CH. Comparison of laparoscopic adrenalectomy with open surgery for adrenal tumors. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009;25(8):438–44.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boylu U, Oommen M, Lee BR, Thomas R. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses: pushing the envelope. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):971–5.CrossRefPubMed Boylu U, Oommen M, Lee BR, Thomas R. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses: pushing the envelope. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):971–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zhang X, Fu B, Lang B, Zhang J, Xu K, Li HZ, Ma X, Zheng T. Technique of anatomical retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy with report of 800 cases. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1254–7.CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Fu B, Lang B, Zhang J, Xu K, Li HZ, Ma X, Zheng T. Technique of anatomical retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy with report of 800 cases. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1254–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Karanikola E, Tsigris C, Kontzoglou K, Nikiteas N. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: where do we stand now? Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;220(4):259–65.CrossRefPubMed Karanikola E, Tsigris C, Kontzoglou K, Nikiteas N. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: where do we stand now? Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;220(4):259–65.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Xu T, Xia L, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhong S, Qin L, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Shen Z. Effectiveness of partial adrenalectomy for concomitant hypertension in patients with nonfunctional adrenal adenoma. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(1):59–67.CrossRefPubMed Xu T, Xia L, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhong S, Qin L, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Shen Z. Effectiveness of partial adrenalectomy for concomitant hypertension in patients with nonfunctional adrenal adenoma. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(1):59–67.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dalvi AN, Thapar PM, Thapar VB, Rege SA, Deshpande AA. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: single team experience. J Minimal Access Surg. 2012;8(4):125–8.CrossRef Dalvi AN, Thapar PM, Thapar VB, Rege SA, Deshpande AA. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: single team experience. J Minimal Access Surg. 2012;8(4):125–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Elfenbein DM, Scarborough JE, Speicher PJ, Scheri RP. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):216–20.CrossRefPubMed Elfenbein DM, Scarborough JE, Speicher PJ, Scheri RP. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):216–20.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hisano M, Vicentini FC, Srougi M. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in pheochromocytoma. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2012;67(Suppl 1):161–7.CrossRef Hisano M, Vicentini FC, Srougi M. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in pheochromocytoma. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2012;67(Suppl 1):161–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gaujoux S, Bonnet S, Leconte M, Zohar S, Bertherat J, Bertagna X, Dousset B. Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1392–9.CrossRefPubMed Gaujoux S, Bonnet S, Leconte M, Zohar S, Bertherat J, Bertagna X, Dousset B. Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1392–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, De Crea C, Sollazzi L, Perilli V, Cazzato MT, Bellantone R. Endoscopic adrenalectomy: is there an optimal operative approach? Results of a single-center case-control study. Surgery. 2008;144(6):1008–14. discussion 1014-1005CrossRefPubMed Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, De Crea C, Sollazzi L, Perilli V, Cazzato MT, Bellantone R. Endoscopic adrenalectomy: is there an optimal operative approach? Results of a single-center case-control study. Surgery. 2008;144(6):1008–14. discussion 1014-1005CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fiszer P, Toutounchi S, Pogorzelski R, Krajewska E, Ciesla W, Skorski M. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy - assessing the learning curve. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny. 2012;84(6):293–7.CrossRefPubMed Fiszer P, Toutounchi S, Pogorzelski R, Krajewska E, Ciesla W, Skorski M. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy - assessing the learning curve. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny. 2012;84(6):293–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Tiberio GA, Baiocchi GL, Arru L, Agabiti Rosei C, De Ponti S, Matheis A, Rizzoni D, Giulini SM. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for sporadic pheochromocytoma. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(6):1435–9.CrossRefPubMed Tiberio GA, Baiocchi GL, Arru L, Agabiti Rosei C, De Ponti S, Matheis A, Rizzoni D, Giulini SM. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for sporadic pheochromocytoma. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(6):1435–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Castillo O, Sanchez-Salas R, Vidal I. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Minerva Urol e Nefrol. 2008;60(3):177–84. Castillo O, Sanchez-Salas R, Vidal I. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Minerva Urol e Nefrol. 2008;60(3):177–84.
21.
go back to reference Zaki FM, Osman SS, Abdul Manaf Z, Mahadevan J, Yahya M. The value of pre-operative embolisation in primary inferior vena cava paraganglioma. Malays J Med Sci. 2011;18(2):70–3.PubMedPubMedCentral Zaki FM, Osman SS, Abdul Manaf Z, Mahadevan J, Yahya M. The value of pre-operative embolisation in primary inferior vena cava paraganglioma. Malays J Med Sci. 2011;18(2):70–3.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Surgical management of large adrenal tumors: impact of different laparoscopic approaches and resection methods on perioperative and long-term outcomes
Authors
Wei Chen
Yong Liang
Wei Lin
Guang-Qing Fu
Zhi-Wei Ma
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0349-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Urology 1/2018 Go to the issue