Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis

Authors: Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Jesse Yu Tajima, Ryoma Yokoi, Shigeru Kiyama, Masahide Endo, Yuta Sato, Masashi Kuno, Hirokatsu Hayashi, Ryuichi Asai, Masahiro Fukada, Itaru Yasufuku, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Naoki Okumura, Katsutoshi Murase, Takuma Ishihara, Takao Takahashi

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The most common postoperative complication in malignant rectal surgery is anastomotic leakage (AL). AL after anterior or low anterior resection in rectal tumors is a fatal postoperative complication. Recently, the first automated suture circular stapler, which is expected to reduce the incidence of AL, (J&J).

Materials and methods

This study included a total of 248 rectal tumor patients who underwent double stapler technique (DST) anastomotic procedures in the department of gastroenterological surgery /pediatric surgery at Gifu University School of Medicine from January 2017 to December 2021. The experience of a single institution utilizing the The Echelon circular™ stapler (ECP stapler:Manual VS Automatic) in rectal surgery cases was evaluated retrospectively from maintained database.

Result

One hundred thirty-nine patients (58.4%) were performed by manual circular stapling, 99 patients (41.6%) by powerd circular stapling. Diverting stoma was performed in 45 cases (32.4%) by manual circular stapling, 42 patients (42.4%) by powerd circular stapling Postoperative complications were occurred clavien-dindo grade II or higher in 57 cases (23.9%) and grade III or higher in 20 cases (8.4%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 patients (5.9%) within all grades. After IPTW, the variables of patient characteristics was SMD ≤ 0.2 (Table.3), and there was a significant difference in anastomotic leakage (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% Confidence Interval(CI), 0.34–0.98 and there was a significant difference in anastomotic leakage (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.58; 95% Confidence Interval(CI), 0.34–0.98; p = 0.044). In addition, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications in grade II or higher (OR, 0.88; 95%CI, 0.65–1.18; p = 0.394) and grade III or higher (OR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.28–0.73; p = 0.001) were significantly remarkable lower in powered circular stapling group.

Conclusion

In this IPTW comparison of patients undergoing rectal reconstructions, the ECP trial cohort had lower risks of several surgical complications AL and statistically signifcant lower rates of ileus/bowel obstruction, infection, and bleeding as Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade II and III as compared with for whom manual circular staplers were used.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):259–64.CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):259–64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Bonino MA, Ris F, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Foo DCC, et al. Intraoperative use of fluorescence with indocyanine green reduces anastomotic leak rates in rectal cancer surgery: an individual participant data analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(10):4281–90.CrossRefPubMed Arezzo A, Bonino MA, Ris F, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Foo DCC, et al. Intraoperative use of fluorescence with indocyanine green reduces anastomotic leak rates in rectal cancer surgery: an individual participant data analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(10):4281–90.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tinmouth J, Tomlinson G. Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer [letter]. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:933.CrossRefPubMed Tinmouth J, Tomlinson G. Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer [letter]. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:933.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2988–95.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2988–95.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(6):694–701.CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(6):694–701.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fukada M, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Imai H, Tanaka Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):178.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Fukada M, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Imai H, Tanaka Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):178.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pla-Martí V, Martín-Arévalo J, Moro-Valdezate D, García-Botello S, Mora-Oliver I, Gadea-Mateo R, et al. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(3):279–84.CrossRefPubMed Pla-Martí V, Martín-Arévalo J, Moro-Valdezate D, García-Botello S, Mora-Oliver I, Gadea-Mateo R, et al. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(3):279–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Atallah S, Kural S, Banda N, Banda A, Bawaney F, Cabral F, et al. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(5):479–86.CrossRefPubMed Atallah S, Kural S, Banda N, Banda A, Bawaney F, Cabral F, et al. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(5):479–86.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sylla P, Sagar P, Johnston SS, Dwarakanathan HR, Waggoner JR, Schwiers M, et al. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(4):2541–53.CrossRefPubMed Sylla P, Sagar P, Johnston SS, Dwarakanathan HR, Waggoner JR, Schwiers M, et al. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(4):2541–53.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Suwa Y, Suwa H, Ota M, Kunisaki C, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):202–8.CrossRefPubMed Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Suwa Y, Suwa H, Ota M, Kunisaki C, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):202–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhang W, Che X. Effect of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on preventing anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Today. 2021;51(9):1415–28.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Che X. Effect of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on preventing anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Today. 2021;51(9):1415–28.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Emile SH, Khan SM, Wexner SD. Impact of change in the surgical plan based on indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on the rates of colorectal anastomotic leak: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(4):2245–57.CrossRefPubMed Emile SH, Khan SM, Wexner SD. Impact of change in the surgical plan based on indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on the rates of colorectal anastomotic leak: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(4):2245–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Daniel VT, Alavi K, Davids JS, Sturrock PR, Harnsberger CR, Steele SR, et al. The utility of the delphi method in defining anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2020;219(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed Daniel VT, Alavi K, Davids JS, Sturrock PR, Harnsberger CR, Steele SR, et al. The utility of the delphi method in defining anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2020;219(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pollack E, Johnston S, Petraiuolo WJ, Roy S, Galvain T. Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;17(13):531–40.CrossRef Pollack E, Johnston S, Petraiuolo WJ, Roy S, Galvain T. Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;17(13):531–40.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis
Authors
Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
Jesse Yu Tajima
Ryoma Yokoi
Shigeru Kiyama
Masahide Endo
Yuta Sato
Masashi Kuno
Hirokatsu Hayashi
Ryuichi Asai
Masahiro Fukada
Itaru Yasufuku
Yoshihiro Tanaka
Naoki Okumura
Katsutoshi Murase
Takuma Ishihara
Takao Takahashi
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02218-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Surgery 1/2023 Go to the issue