Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use

Authors: Johannes Leitgeb, MD, Rupert Schuster, MD, Bit New Yee, Pui Fong Chee, Julian-Camill Harnoss, MD, Peter Starzengruber, MD, Michael Schäffer, MD, Ojan Assadian, MD

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A surgical glove will protect surgeons and patients only if the glove’s integrity remains intact. However, several studies have demonstrated that undetected micro-perforations of surgical gloves are common. Because of the possibility of surgical glove puncture, an antimicrobial surgical glove was developed. The aim of this laboratory based experimental study was to assess the antibacterial efficacy of the interior chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG)-coat of an antimicrobial synthetic polyisoprene surgical glove by using a standardized microbiological challenge.

Methods

Sixteen healthy adult participants donned one antimicrobial surgical glove and one non-antimicrobial surgical glove randomly allocated to their dominant and non-dominant hand following a crossover design. During a 2-h wear time, participants performed standardized finger and hand movements. Thereafter, the interior surface of excised fingers of the removed gloves was challenged with 8.00 log10 cfu/mL S. aureus (ATCC 6538) or K. pneumoniae (ATCC 4352), respectively. The main outcome measure was the viable mean log10 cfu counts of the two glove groups after 5 min contact with the interior glove’s surface.

Results

When comparing an antimicrobial glove against an untreated reference glove after 2-h simulated use wear-time, a mean reduction factor of 6.24 log10 (S. aureus) and 6.22 log10 (K. pneumoniae) was achieved after 5 min contact.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that wearing antibacterial gloves on hands does not negatively impact their antibacterial activity after 2-h of wear. This may have a potential benefit for patient safety in case of glove puncture during surgical procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hübner NO, Goerdt AM, Stanislawski N, Assadian O, Heidecke CD, Kramer A. Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hübner NO, Goerdt AM, Stanislawski N, Assadian O, Heidecke CD, Kramer A. Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Harnoss J, Partecke LI, Heidecke CD, Huebner NO, Kramer A, Assadian O. Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38:154–8.CrossRefPubMed Harnoss J, Partecke LI, Heidecke CD, Huebner NO, Kramer A, Assadian O. Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38:154–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, Rosenthal R, Zwahlen M, Fueglistaler P, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch Surg. 2009;144:553–8.CrossRefPubMed Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, Rosenthal R, Zwahlen M, Fueglistaler P, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch Surg. 2009;144:553–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Eklund AM, Ojajarvi J, Laitinen K, Valtonen M, Werkkala KA. Glove punctures and postoperative skin flora of hands in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:149–53.CrossRefPubMed Eklund AM, Ojajarvi J, Laitinen K, Valtonen M, Werkkala KA. Glove punctures and postoperative skin flora of hands in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:149–53.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Partecke LI, Goerdt AM, Langner I, Jaeger B, Assadian O, Heidecke CD, et al. Incidence of microperforation for surgical gloves depends on duration of wear. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:409–14.CrossRefPubMed Partecke LI, Goerdt AM, Langner I, Jaeger B, Assadian O, Heidecke CD, et al. Incidence of microperforation for surgical gloves depends on duration of wear. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:409–14.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Laine T, Kaipia A, Santavirta J, Aarnio P. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving. Scand J Surg. 2004;93:73–6.CrossRefPubMed Laine T, Kaipia A, Santavirta J, Aarnio P. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving. Scand J Surg. 2004;93:73–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kojima Y, Ohashi M. Unnoticed glove perforation during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1078–80.CrossRefPubMed Kojima Y, Ohashi M. Unnoticed glove perforation during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1078–80.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pitten FA, Herdemann G, Kramer A. The integrity of latex gloves in clinical dental practice. Infection. 2000;28:388–92.CrossRefPubMed Pitten FA, Herdemann G, Kramer A. The integrity of latex gloves in clinical dental practice. Infection. 2000;28:388–92.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Manjunath AP, Shepherd JH, Barton DP, Bridges JE, Ind TE. Glove perforations during open surgery for gynaecological malignancies. BJOG. 2008;115:1015–9.CrossRefPubMed Manjunath AP, Shepherd JH, Barton DP, Bridges JE, Ind TE. Glove perforations during open surgery for gynaecological malignancies. BJOG. 2008;115:1015–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wright JG, McGeer AJ, Chyatte D, Ransohoff DF. Exposure rates to patients' blood for surgical personnel. Surgery. 1993;114:897–901.PubMed Wright JG, McGeer AJ, Chyatte D, Ransohoff DF. Exposure rates to patients' blood for surgical personnel. Surgery. 1993;114:897–901.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Merigliano S, Montorsi M, Poggioli G, Stella M, Borzomati D, et al. Reducing the occupational risk of infections for the surgeon: multicentric national survey on more than 15,000 surgical procedures. World J Surg. 1997;21:573–8.CrossRefPubMed Pietrabissa A, Merigliano S, Montorsi M, Poggioli G, Stella M, Borzomati D, et al. Reducing the occupational risk of infections for the surgeon: multicentric national survey on more than 15,000 surgical procedures. World J Surg. 1997;21:573–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Adesunkanmi AK, Badmus TA, Ogunlusi JO. Accidental injuries and cutaneous contaminations during general surgical operations in a Nigerian teaching hospital. East Afr Med J. 2003;80:227–34.PubMed Adesunkanmi AK, Badmus TA, Ogunlusi JO. Accidental injuries and cutaneous contaminations during general surgical operations in a Nigerian teaching hospital. East Afr Med J. 2003;80:227–34.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Carlton JE, Dodson TB, Cleveland JL, Lockwood SA. Percutaneous injuries during oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:553–6.CrossRefPubMed Carlton JE, Dodson TB, Cleveland JL, Lockwood SA. Percutaneous injuries during oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:553–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Myers DJ, Epling C, Dement J, Hunt D. Risk of sharp device-related blood and body fluid exposure in operating rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:1139–48.CrossRefPubMed Myers DJ, Epling C, Dement J, Hunt D. Risk of sharp device-related blood and body fluid exposure in operating rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:1139–48.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Daeschlein G, Kramer A, Arnold A, Ladwig A, Seabrook GR, Edmiston Jr CE. Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39:98–103.CrossRefPubMed Daeschlein G, Kramer A, Arnold A, Ladwig A, Seabrook GR, Edmiston Jr CE. Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39:98–103.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Assadian O, Kramer A, Ouriel K, Suchomel M, McLaws ML, Rottman M, et al. Suppression of surgeons’ bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures using a new antimicrobial surgical glove. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15:43–9.CrossRef Assadian O, Kramer A, Ouriel K, Suchomel M, McLaws ML, Rottman M, et al. Suppression of surgeons’ bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures using a new antimicrobial surgical glove. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15:43–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dosis A, Aggarwal R, Bello F, Moorthy K, Munz Y, Gillies D, et al. Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. Arch Surg. 2005;140:293–9.CrossRefPubMed Dosis A, Aggarwal R, Bello F, Moorthy K, Munz Y, Gillies D, et al. Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. Arch Surg. 2005;140:293–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K, Milland T, Papasavas P, Dosis A, et al. An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2007;245:992–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K, Milland T, Papasavas P, Dosis A, et al. An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2007;245:992–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference ASTM. E1054 – Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2013. ASTM. E1054 – Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2013.
22.
go back to reference Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Andrus ML, Dudeck MA, Pollock DA, Horan TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:609–26.CrossRefPubMed Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Andrus ML, Dudeck MA, Pollock DA, Horan TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:609–26.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use
Authors
Johannes Leitgeb, MD
Rupert Schuster, MD
Bit New Yee
Pui Fong Chee
Julian-Camill Harnoss, MD
Peter Starzengruber, MD
Michael Schäffer, MD
Ojan Assadian, MD
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-015-0058-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Surgery 1/2015 Go to the issue