Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Dysphagia | Research

Safety and efficacy of day anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a retrospective analysis

Authors: Long Tang, Yu Chen, Fandong Wang, Yuanbin Liu, Zhaojun Song, Miao Wang, Yong Zhou, Huiyi Liu, Jiazhuang Zheng

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Our study aimed to develop a day anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure to treat degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCS). The goal was to analyze its clinical implications, safety, and early effects to provide a better surgical option for eligible DCS patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed to identify DCS patients who underwent day ACDF from September 2022 to August 2023. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rate (RR), incidence of dysphagia-related symptoms, 30-day hospital readmission rate, and incidence of other complications were recorded to evaluate early clinical outcomes. Radiography was performed to assess the location of the implants, neurological decompression, and cervical physiological curvature.

Results

All 33 patients (23 women and 10 men) underwent successful surgery and experienced significant symptomatic and neurological improvements. Among them, 26 patients underwent one-segment ACDF, 5 underwent two-segment ACDF, and 2 underwent three-segment ACDF. The average operative time was 71.1 ± 20.2 min, intraoperative blood loss was 19.1 ± 6.2 mL, and postoperative drainage was 9.6 ± 5.8 mL. The preoperative VAS and NDI scores improved postoperatively (7.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3 and 66.7% ± 4.8% vs. 24.1% ± 2.5%, respectively), with a significant difference (P < 0.01). Moreover, the preoperative JOA scores improved significantly postoperatively (7.7 ± 1.3 vs. 14.2 ± 1.4; P < 0.01) with an RR of 93.9% in good or excellent. Postoperative dysphagia-related symptoms occurred in one patient (3.0%). During the follow-up period, no patient was readmitted within 30 days after discharge; however, an incisional hematoma was reported in one patient on the 6th day after discharge, which was cured by pressure dressing. The postoperative radiographs revealed perfect implant positions and sufficient nerve decompression in all patients. Furthermore, the preoperative cervical physiological curvature improved significantly after the operation (14.5° ± 4.0° vs. 26.3° ± 5.4°; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Day ACDF has good safety and early clinical efficacy, and it could be an appropriate choice for eligible DCS patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Williams J, D’Amore P, Redlich N, Darlow M, Suwak P, Sarkovich S, et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Evaluation and Management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2022;53:509–21.CrossRefPubMed Williams J, D’Amore P, Redlich N, Darlow M, Suwak P, Sarkovich S, et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Evaluation and Management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2022;53:509–21.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kane SF, Abadie KV, Willson A. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recognition and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102:740–50.PubMed Kane SF, Abadie KV, Willson A. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recognition and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102:740–50.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kamalapathy PN, Puvanesarajah V, Sequeria S, Bell J, Hassanzadeh H. Safety profile of outpatient vs inpatient ACDF: An analysis of 33,807 outpatient ACDFs. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;207: 106743.CrossRefPubMed Kamalapathy PN, Puvanesarajah V, Sequeria S, Bell J, Hassanzadeh H. Safety profile of outpatient vs inpatient ACDF: An analysis of 33,807 outpatient ACDFs. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;207: 106743.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Akbar MA, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Furlan JC, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy — update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:108–24.CrossRefPubMed Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Akbar MA, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Furlan JC, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy — update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:108–24.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A:607–24.CrossRefPubMed Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A:607–24.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Saifi C, Fein AW, Cazzulino A, Lehman RA, Phillips FM, An HS, et al. Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013. Spine J. 2018;18:1022–9.CrossRefPubMed Saifi C, Fein AW, Cazzulino A, Lehman RA, Phillips FM, An HS, et al. Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013. Spine J. 2018;18:1022–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Ma Y, Gaber-Baylis LK, Besculides MC, et al. National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine. 2010;35:1454–9.CrossRefPubMed Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Ma Y, Gaber-Baylis LK, Besculides MC, et al. National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine. 2010;35:1454–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dial BL, Esposito VR, Danilkowicz R, O’Donnell J, Sugarman B, Blizzard DJ, et al. Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF. Glob Spine J. 2020;10:252–60.CrossRef Dial BL, Esposito VR, Danilkowicz R, O’Donnell J, Sugarman B, Blizzard DJ, et al. Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF. Glob Spine J. 2020;10:252–60.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shenoy K, Adenikinju A, Dweck E, Buckland AJ, Bendo JA. Same-Day Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion—Our Protocol and Experience: Same-Day Discharge After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Suitable Patients has Similarly Low Readmission Rates as Admitted Patients. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13:479–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shenoy K, Adenikinju A, Dweck E, Buckland AJ, Bendo JA. Same-Day Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion—Our Protocol and Experience: Same-Day Discharge After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Suitable Patients has Similarly Low Readmission Rates as Admitted Patients. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13:479–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Shapiro S, Connolly P, Donnaldson J, Abel T. Cadaveric fibula, locking plate, and allogeneic bone matrix for anterior cervical fusions after cervical discectomy for radiculopathy or myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2001;95:43–50.CrossRef Shapiro S, Connolly P, Donnaldson J, Abel T. Cadaveric fibula, locking plate, and allogeneic bone matrix for anterior cervical fusions after cervical discectomy for radiculopathy or myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2001;95:43–50.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ryu SI, Lim JT, Kim S-M, Paterno J, Kim DH. Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1339–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ryu SI, Lim JT, Kim S-M, Paterno J, Kim DH. Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1339–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S. Thirty-Day Morbidity After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Identification of Risk Factors and Emphasis on the Safety of Outpatient Procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1288–94.CrossRefPubMed Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S. Thirty-Day Morbidity After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Identification of Risk Factors and Emphasis on the Safety of Outpatient Procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1288–94.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Renfree SP, Makovicka JL, Chung AS. Risk factors for delay in surgery for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spine Surg. 2019;5:475–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Renfree SP, Makovicka JL, Chung AS. Risk factors for delay in surgery for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spine Surg. 2019;5:475–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Lamperti M, Tufegdzic B, Avitsian R. Management of complex spine surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30:551–6.CrossRefPubMed Lamperti M, Tufegdzic B, Avitsian R. Management of complex spine surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30:551–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tally WC, Tarabadkar S, Kovalenko BV. Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review. Int J Spine Surg. 2013;7:e84–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tally WC, Tarabadkar S, Kovalenko BV. Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review. Int J Spine Surg. 2013;7:e84–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Arshi A, Wang C, Park HY, Blumstein GW, Buser Z, Wang JC, et al. Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database. Spine J. 2018;18:1180–7.CrossRefPubMed Arshi A, Wang C, Park HY, Blumstein GW, Buser Z, Wang JC, et al. Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database. Spine J. 2018;18:1180–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Villavicencio AT, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, Thramann JJ. The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2007;7:148–53.CrossRef Villavicencio AT, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, Thramann JJ. The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2007;7:148–53.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1981;6:354–64.CrossRefPubMed Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1981;6:354–64.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine. 2002;27:2453–8.CrossRefPubMed Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine. 2002;27:2453–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference McGirt MJ, Godil SS, Asher AL, Parker SL, Devin CJ. Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E9.CrossRefPubMed McGirt MJ, Godil SS, Asher AL, Parker SL, Devin CJ. Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fowler SB, Anthony-Phillips P, Mehta D, Liebman K. Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy fusion. J Neurosci Nurs J Am Assoc Neurosci Nurses. 2005;37:97–100. Fowler SB, Anthony-Phillips P, Mehta D, Liebman K. Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy fusion. J Neurosci Nurs J Am Assoc Neurosci Nurses. 2005;37:97–100.
23.
go back to reference McClelland S, Passias PG, Errico TJ, Bess RS, Protopsaltis TS. Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McClelland S, Passias PG, Errico TJ, Bess RS, Protopsaltis TS. Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Wang Z, Zhu R, Yang H, Gan M, Zhang S, Shen M, et al. The application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:462–6.CrossRefPubMed Wang Z, Zhu R, Yang H, Gan M, Zhang S, Shen M, et al. The application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:462–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Qi M, Chen H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liang L, Yuan W. The use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: A preliminary clinical investigation. Bone Jt J. 2013;95-B:543–7.CrossRef Qi M, Chen H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liang L, Yuan W. The use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: A preliminary clinical investigation. Bone Jt J. 2013;95-B:543–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yan B, Nie L. Clinical comparison of Zero-profile interbody fusion device and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion in treating cervical spondylosis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13854–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Yan B, Nie L. Clinical comparison of Zero-profile interbody fusion device and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion in treating cervical spondylosis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13854–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Zhang J, Wang S, Tang X, Xiong W, Wu H, Liu C, et al. Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27:189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang J, Wang S, Tang X, Xiong W, Wu H, Liu C, et al. Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27:189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Sagi HC, Beutler W, Carroll E, Connolly PJ. Airway complications associated with surgery on the anterior cervical spine. Spine. 2002;27:949–53.CrossRefPubMed Sagi HC, Beutler W, Carroll E, Connolly PJ. Airway complications associated with surgery on the anterior cervical spine. Spine. 2002;27:949–53.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hofstetter CP, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar JA. Zero-profile Anchored Spacer Reduces Rate of Dysphagia Compared With ACDF With Anterior Plating. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:E284–90.CrossRefPubMed Hofstetter CP, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar JA. Zero-profile Anchored Spacer Reduces Rate of Dysphagia Compared With ACDF With Anterior Plating. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:E284–90.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and efficacy of day anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a retrospective analysis
Authors
Long Tang
Yu Chen
Fandong Wang
Yuanbin Liu
Zhaojun Song
Miao Wang
Yong Zhou
Huiyi Liu
Jiazhuang Zheng
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07356-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2024 Go to the issue