Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Arthroscopy | Research

Safe femoral condyle range for the reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation device in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: Zhongliu Luo, Yong Hu, Qingmin Han, Zhi Gao, Songmiao Cheng

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the characteristics of cross-pin protrusion in patients treated with the reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation device for femoral tunnel preparation through the anteromedial portal in Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), analyse the reasons for this outcome, and identify safety hazards of this surgical technique for improvement.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ACLR using this technology at our hospital in 2018 was conducted. Patients with and without cross-pin protrusion were included in the protrusion positive and negative groups, respectively. The sex, age and imaging characteristics of the patients with cross-pin protrusion were identified, and the reasons for cross-pin protrusion were analysed.

Results

There were 64 and 212 patients in the protrusion positive and negative groups, respectively. The proportion of cross-pin protrusion cases was 23.19% (64/276). There was a significant difference in the ratio of males to females (P < 0.001, χ2 = 185.184), the mediolateral femoral condyle diameter (protrusion positive group, 70.59 ± 2.51 mm; protrusion negative group, 82.65 ± 4.16 mm; P < 0.001, t = 28.424), and the anteroposterior diameter of the lateral femoral condyle (protrusion positive group, 58.34 ± 2.89 mm; protrusion negative group, 66.38 ± 3.53 mm; P < 0.001, t = 16.615). The cross-pins did not penetrate the lateral femoral condyle cortex in patients with a mediolateral femoral condyle diameter ≥ 76 mm, but the cross-pins definitely penetrated the cortex when the diameter was ≤ 70 mm. The cross-pins did not penetrate when the anteroposterior lateral femoral condyle diameter was ≥ 66 mm, but the cross-pins definitely penetrated it when the diameter was ≤ 59 mm.

Conclusion

The patients with cross-pin protrusion after reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation treatment to prepare the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial portal in ACLR were mainly females with small femoral condyles. For patients with a mediolateral femoral condyle diameter ≥ 76 mm and an anteroposterior lateral femoral condyle diameter ≥ 66 mm, there is no risk of cross-pin protrusion, so this technique can be used with confidence.

Levels of evidence

III.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:5–47.CrossRef Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:5–47.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pearle AD, McAllister D, Howell SM. Rationale for strategic graft placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: I.D.E.A.L. femoral tunnel position. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44:253–8. Pearle AD, McAllister D, Howell SM. Rationale for strategic graft placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: I.D.E.A.L. femoral tunnel position. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44:253–8.
3.
go back to reference Voigt C, Schönaich M, Lill H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: state of the art. Eur J Trauma. 2006;32:332–9.CrossRef Voigt C, Schönaich M, Lill H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: state of the art. Eur J Trauma. 2006;32:332–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Colvin A, Sharma C, Parides M, Glashow J. What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1075–81.CrossRef Colvin A, Sharma C, Parides M, Glashow J. What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1075–81.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rose T, Hepp P, Venus J, Stockmar C, Josten C, Lill H. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction–a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:730–8.CrossRef Rose T, Hepp P, Venus J, Stockmar C, Josten C, Lill H. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction–a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:730–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Boden RA, Razak A, Hussain SM, McLoughlin SJ. Loose body following cross-pin fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013;14:155–7.CrossRef Boden RA, Razak A, Hussain SM, McLoughlin SJ. Loose body following cross-pin fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013;14:155–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee GC, Kim DH, Park SH. Popliteal artery pseudoaneurysm after anterior cruciate ligament re-revision using a rigidfix cross pin. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014;26:121–4.CrossRef Lee GC, Kim DH, Park SH. Popliteal artery pseudoaneurysm after anterior cruciate ligament re-revision using a rigidfix cross pin. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014;26:121–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hu Y, Tang J. Retrograde cross-pin (RigidFix) femoral fixation in anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with the transportal technique. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016;6:44. Hu Y, Tang J. Retrograde cross-pin (RigidFix) femoral fixation in anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with the transportal technique. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016;6:44.
9.
go back to reference Castoldi F, Bonasia DE, Marmotti A, Dettoni F, Rossi R. ACL reconstruction using the rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial portal: a cadaver study to evaluate chondral injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:275–8.CrossRef Castoldi F, Bonasia DE, Marmotti A, Dettoni F, Rossi R. ACL reconstruction using the rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial portal: a cadaver study to evaluate chondral injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:275–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chang CB, Yoo JH, Chung BJ, Seong SC, Kim TK. Oblique femoral tunnel placement can increase risks of short femoral tunnel and cross-pin protrusion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1237–45.CrossRef Chang CB, Yoo JH, Chung BJ, Seong SC, Kim TK. Oblique femoral tunnel placement can increase risks of short femoral tunnel and cross-pin protrusion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1237–45.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10:14–21.PubMed Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10:14–21.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:231–40.CrossRef Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:231–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Klein JP, Lintner DM, Downs D, Vavrenka K. The incidence and significance of femoral tunnel widening after quadrupled hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral cross pin fixation. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:470–6.CrossRef Klein JP, Lintner DM, Downs D, Vavrenka K. The incidence and significance of femoral tunnel widening after quadrupled hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral cross pin fixation. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:470–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:234–8.CrossRef L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD. Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:234–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:122–8.CrossRef Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:122–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, et al. Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:1108–13.CrossRef Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, et al. Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:1108–13.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Giorgio N, Moretti L, Pignataro P, Carrozzo M, Vicenti G, Moretti B. Correlation between fixation systems elasticity and bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6:467–72.CrossRef Giorgio N, Moretti L, Pignataro P, Carrozzo M, Vicenti G, Moretti B. Correlation between fixation systems elasticity and bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6:467–72.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee DH, Son DW, Seo YR, Lee IG. Comparison of femoral tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral cross-pin fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020;32:11.CrossRef Lee DH, Son DW, Seo YR, Lee IG. Comparison of femoral tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral cross-pin fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020;32:11.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Saccomanno MF, Shin JJ, Mascarenhas R, et al. Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:1491–8.CrossRef Saccomanno MF, Shin JJ, Mascarenhas R, et al. Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:1491–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Martin SD, Martin TL, Brown CH. Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:685–96.CrossRef Martin SD, Martin TL, Brown CH. Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:685–96.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shin YS, Ro KH, Lee JH, Lee DH. Location of the femoral tunnel aperture in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2533–9.CrossRef Shin YS, Ro KH, Lee JH, Lee DH. Location of the femoral tunnel aperture in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2533–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liu A, Sun M, Ma C, et al. Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2751–9.CrossRef Liu A, Sun M, Ma C, et al. Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2751–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ro KH, Kim HJ, Lee DH. The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2371–80.CrossRef Ro KH, Kim HJ, Lee DH. The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2371–80.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tudisco C, Bisicchia S. Drilling the femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction: transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1166–72.CrossRef Tudisco C, Bisicchia S. Drilling the femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction: transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1166–72.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Loucas M, Loucas R, D’Ambrosi R, Hantes ME. Clinical and radiological outcomes of anteromedial portal versus transtibial technique in ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:23259671211024590.PubMedPubMedCentral Loucas M, Loucas R, D’Ambrosi R, Hantes ME. Clinical and radiological outcomes of anteromedial portal versus transtibial technique in ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:23259671211024590.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Jamsher M, Ballarati C, Viganò M, et al. Graft inclination angles in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vary depending on femoral tunnel reaming method: comparison among transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in retrograde drilling techniques. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:1095–102.CrossRef Jamsher M, Ballarati C, Viganò M, et al. Graft inclination angles in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vary depending on femoral tunnel reaming method: comparison among transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in retrograde drilling techniques. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:1095–102.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Behrend H, Zdravkovic V, Giesinger JM, Giesinger K. Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1454–60.CrossRef Behrend H, Zdravkovic V, Giesinger JM, Giesinger K. Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1454–60.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Inácio AM, Lopes Júnior OV, Kuhn A, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by means of an anteromedial portal and femoral fixation using rigidfix. Rev Bras Ortop. 2014;49:619–24.CrossRef Inácio AM, Lopes Júnior OV, Kuhn A, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by means of an anteromedial portal and femoral fixation using rigidfix. Rev Bras Ortop. 2014;49:619–24.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gelber P, de la Torre F, Torres R, Pelfort X, Tey M, Monllau J. Anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from the anteromedial portal: evaluation of transverse femoral fixation in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:651–7.CrossRef Gelber P, de la Torre F, Torres R, Pelfort X, Tey M, Monllau J. Anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from the anteromedial portal: evaluation of transverse femoral fixation in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:651–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gelber PE, Reina F, Torres R, Monllau JC. Effect of femoral tunnel length on the safety of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation using cross-pin technique: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1877–84.CrossRef Gelber PE, Reina F, Torres R, Monllau JC. Effect of femoral tunnel length on the safety of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation using cross-pin technique: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1877–84.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Safe femoral condyle range for the reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation device in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors
Zhongliu Luo
Yong Hu
Qingmin Han
Zhi Gao
Songmiao Cheng
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05250-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022 Go to the issue