Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of thoracic spine mobility and posture assessments in subjects with thoracic spine pain

Authors: Jani Takatalo, Jari Ylinen, Tuomo Pienimäki, Arja Häkkinen

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The thoracic spine (TS) has been neglected in the study of the spine despite its essential role in the stability and posture of the entire spinal complex. Therefore, there is an inevitable need to investigate the reproducibility of different thoracic spinal posture measures used in subjects with TS pain.

Methods

Thirty-two subjects (16 females and 16 males, mean age 39 years) were evaluated by two physiotherapists on the same day to gauge inter-rater reliability and on two consecutive days to gauge intra-rater reliability. TS posture was assessed by observation, and thoracic spine mobility was measured by manual assessment of segmental flexion and extension mobility in a seated position. Additionally, posterior-to-anterior accessory mobility in a prone position was assessed manually. Moreover, cervicothoracic flexion in a seated position, thoracic posture, and thoracic flexion and extension mobility in a standing position were assessed with a tape measure, and flexion and extension mobility in a seated position and TS posture in seated and standing positions were measured with an inclinometer. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), mean difference (MD), Bland-Altman (B&A) plot features and coefficient of repeatability (CR) were calculated.

Results

The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the duration of TS pain was 22 (SD 45) months, with the intensity of pain being rated at 27 (SD 21) mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Intra-rater reliability was very strong (ICC ≥ 0.80) for the evaluation of seated and standing upper TS posture, standing whole TS posture and seated lower TS posture with an inclinometer. Moreover, TS posture evaluation with a measuring tape, posture inspection in a seated position, and manual assessment of segmental extension were found to have very strong intra-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability was very strong for inclinometer measurements of standing and seated upper TS posture as well as standing whole TS posture.

Conclusion

Intra-rater reliability was higher than inter-rater reliability in most of the evaluated measurements. Overall, posture measurements with an inclinometer were more reliable than mobility measurements with the same instrument. The manual assessments can be used reliably when same evaluator performs the examination.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Briggs AM, Smith AJ, Straker LM, Bragge P. Thoracic spine pain in the general population: prevalence, incidence and associated factors in children, adolescents and adults. A systematic reviw. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Niemeläinen R, Videman T, Battie MC. Prevalence and characteristics of upper or mid-back pain in Finnish men. Spine. 2006;31:1846–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Briggs AM, Bragge P, Smith AJ, Govil D, Straker LM. Prevalence and associated factors fot thoracic spine pain in the adult working population. A literature review. J Occup Health. 2009;51:177–92.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Edmondston SJ, Singer KP. Thoracic spine: anatomical and biomechanical considerations for manual therapy. Man Ther. 1997;2:132–43.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Willems J, Jull G, Ng J. An in vivo study of the primary and coupled rotations of the thoracic spine. Clin Biomech. 1996/9;11:311–6.CrossRef
6.
Liebsch C, Graf N, Appelt K, Wilke HJ. The rib cage stabilizes the human thoracic spine: An in vitro study using stepwise reduction of rib cage structures. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178733.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
White AA III, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1990. p. 85–126.
8.
Tsang SM, Szeto GP, Lee RY. Normal kinematics of the neck: the interplay between the cervical and thoracic spines. Man Ther. 2013;18:431–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Edmondston SJ, Ferguson A, Ippersiel P, Ronningen L, Sodeland S, Barclay L. Clinical and radiological investigation of thoracic spine extension motion during bilateral arm elevation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:861–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Wirth B, Amstalden M, Perk M, Boutellier U, Humphreys BK. Respiratory dysfunction in patients with chronic neck pain - influence of thoracic spine and chest mobility. Man Ther. 2014;19:440–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
van Kleef M, Stolker RJ, Lataster A, Geurts J, Benzon HT, Mekhail N. Thoracic pain. Pain Practice. 2010;10:327–38.PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
Dwyer A, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. I: a study in normal volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15:453–7.CrossRef
14.
DeFranca GG, Levine LJ. The T4 syndrome. J Manip Physiol Ther. 1995;18:34–7.
15.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Beyer CD, Damron KS. Evaluation of the prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic thoracic pain. Pain Phys. 2002;5:354–9.CrossRef
16.
Dreyfuss P, Tibiletti C, Dreyer SJ. Thoracic zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. A study in normal volunteers. Spine. 1994;19:807–11.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Fukui S, Ohseto K, Shiotani M. Patterns of pain induced by distending the thoracic zygapophyseal joints. Reg Anesth. 1997;22:332–6.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Beynon AM, Hebert JJ, Walker BF. The interrater reliability of static palpation of the thoracic spine for eliciting tenderness and stiffness to test for a manipulable lesion. Chiropr Man Therap. 2018;4;26:49.
19.
Huijbregts PA. Spinal motion palpation: a review of reliability studies. J Manual Manip Ther. 2002;10:24–39.CrossRef
20.
Haneline MT, Young M. A review of intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of static spinal palpation: a literature synthesis. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2009;32:379–86.CrossRef
21.
Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J. Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2014;19:10–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T. Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys Ther. 1993;73:33–44.PubMed
23.
Heneghan NR, Gormley S, Hallam C, Rushton A. Management of thoracic spine pain and dysfunction: a survey of clinical practice in the UK. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;39:58–66.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Karas S, Schneiders A, Reid D, Talisa V. Factors affecting confidence and knowledge in spinal palpation among international manual physical therapists. J Manual Manip Ther. 2016;24:166–73.CrossRef
25.
Viikari-Juntura E, Takala EP, Alaranta H. Neck and shoulder pain and disability. Evaluation by repetitive gripping test. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20:167–73.PubMed
26.
Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment. 4th ed. Phladelphia: Saunders; 2002. p. 168, 437, 445–46, 454.
27.
Póvoa LC, Ferreira APA, Silva JG. Validation of palpatory methods for evaluating anatomical bone landmarks of cervical spine: a systematic review. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2015;38:302–10.CrossRef
28.
Norlander S, Aste-Norlander U, Nordgren B, Sahlstedt B. A clinical method for measuring segmental flexion mobility in the cervico-thoracic spine and a model for classification. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:89–98.PubMed
29.
Czaprowski D, Pawlowska P, Gebicka A, Sitarski D, Kotwicki T. Intra- and Interobserver repeatability of the assessment of Anteroposterior curvatures of the spine using Saunders digital inclinometer. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2012;2:145–53.CrossRef
30.
Kaltenborn FM. The spine. In: Basic evaluation and mobilization techniques. 2nd ed. Oslo: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel; 1993. p. 215, 223, 227.
31.
Hengeveld E, Banks. Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation: Management of Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 1. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2013. p. 202.
32.
Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:3101–10.CrossRef
33.
Evans J. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing; 1996.
34.
Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE, Parsons R, Andreou P. The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability. PLoS One. 8(9):e73990.
35.
Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA, Parnianpour M. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values. Spine. 2001;26:53–60.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Tousignant M, Boucher N, Bourbonnais J, Gravelle T, Quesnel M, Brosseau L. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI−320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects. Man Ther. 2001;6:235–41.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Mueller-Klaus K, Oatis CA. Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Phys Ther. 1992;72:425–31.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, Whitman JM. Interrater reliability of the history and physical examination in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1388–95.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Gonella C, Paris SV, Kutner M. Reliability in evaluating passive intervertebral motion. Phys Ther. 1982;62:436–44.CrossRef
40.
van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C. Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2005;10:256–69.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Hansen BE, Simonsen T, Leboeuf-Yde C. Motion palpation of the lumbar spine—a problem with the test or the tester? J Manip Physiol Ther. 2006/0;29:208–12.CrossRef
42.
Christensen HW, Vach W, Vach K, Manniche C, Haghfelt T, Hartvigsen L, et al. Palpation of the upper thoracic spine: An observer reliability study. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2002/6;25:285–92.CrossRef
43.
Brismée J, Gipson D, Ivie D, Lopez A, Moore M, Matthijs O, et al. Interrater reliability of a passive physiological intervertebral motion test in the mid-thoracic spine. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2006/6;29:368–73.CrossRef
44.
Potter L, McCarthy C, Oldham J. Intraexaminer reliability of identifying a dysfunctional segment in the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Manip Physiol Ther, 2006/0. 29:203–7.
45.
Robinson R, Robinson HS, Bjorke G, Kvale A. Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5. Man Ther. 2009;14:409–14.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Heiderscheit B, Boissonnault W. Reliability of joint mobility and pain assessment of the thoracic spine and rib cage in asymptomatic individuals. J Manual Manip Ther. 2008;16:210–6.CrossRef
47.
Walker BF, Koppenhaver SL, Stomski NJ, Hebert JJ. Interrater reliability of motion palpation in the thoracic spine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:815407.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Haas M, Panzer D, Peterson D, Raphael R. Short-term responsiveness of manual thoracic end-play assessment to spinal manipulation: a randomized controlled trial of construct validity. J Manip Physiol Ther. 1995;18:582–9.
49.
Gavin D. The effect of joint manipulation techniques on active range of motion in the mid-thoracic spine of asymptomatic subjects. J Manual Manip Ther. 1999;7:114–22.CrossRef
50.
Schiller L. Effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy in the treatment of mechanical thoracic spine pain: A pilot randomized clinical trial. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2001/7;24:394–401.CrossRef
51.
Sung YB, Lee JH, Park YH. Effects of thoracic mobilization and manipulation on function and mental state in chronic lower back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:1711–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Hole DE, Cook JM, Bolton JE. Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender. Man Ther. 1995;1:36–42.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Portek I, Pearcy MJ, Reader GP, Mowat AG. Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br J Rheumatol. 1983;22:197–205.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Rondinelli R, Murphy J, Esler A, Marciano T, Cholmakjian C. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry – a comparison of three methods. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 1992;71:219–24.CrossRef
55.
Post RB, Leferink VJM. Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:187–92.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:122–36.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Alricsson M, Björklund G, Cronholm M, Olsson O, Viklund P, Svantesson U. Spinal alignment, mobility of the hip and thoracic spine and prevalence of low back pain in young elite cross-country skiers. J Exerc Rehab. 2018;12:21–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of thoracic spine mobility and posture assessments in subjects with thoracic spine pain
Authors
Jani Takatalo
Jari Ylinen
Tuomo Pienimäki
Arja Häkkinen
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03551-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research article

Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts

Research article

Repository corticotropin injection attenuates collagen-induced arthritic joint structural damage and has enhanced effects in combination with etanercept

Research article

Shoulder range of movement in the general population: age and gender stratified normative data using a community-based cohort

Research article

Elastic pneumatic tourniquet cuff can reduce postoperative thigh pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial

Correction

Correction to: Sonographic follow-up after endoscopic carpal tunnel release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome: a one-year neuroanatomical prospective observational study

Research article

High detection rate of osteoporosis with screening of a general hospitalized population: a 6-year study in 6406 patients in a university hospital setting