Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | COVID-19 | Research

Implementing a pilot study of COVID-19 self-testing in high-risk populations and remote locations: results and lessons learnt

Authors: Elena Marbán-Castro, Vladimer Getia, Maia Alkhazashvili, Maia Japaridze, Ia Jikia, Berra Erkosar, Paula Del Rey-Puech, Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez, Paata Imnadze, Amiran Gamkrelidze, Olga Denisiuk, Elena Ivanova Reipold, Sonjelle Shilton

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rapid antigen-detection tests for SARS-CoV-2 self-testing represent a useful tool for pandemic control and expanding access to community-level case screening. COVID-19 self-tests have been extensively used in high-income countries since 2021; however, their introduction and programmatic implementation in low- and middle-income countries was delayed. We aimed to identify and continuously improve a weekly COVID-19 self-testing model among staff at healthcare facilities and schools.

Methods

This mixed-methods, observational prospective study was conducted in 5 healthcare centres and 24 schools in Georgia, between June and December 2022. The study comprised the integration of COVID-19 self-testing into the national mandatory testing programme for high-risk groups, with primary distribution of self-tests among staff performed weekly, plus secondary distribution to their household members. These use cases were selected because NCDC was seeking to strengthen their already strong weekly testing programme, by investigating self-testing to ease the burden of testing in the healthcare system. Online surveys and semi-structured interviews were used for data collection.

Results

In total, 2156 participants were enrolled (1963 female, 72%). At baseline and mid- and end-points, 88%, 97% and 99%, respectively, of participants agreed/strongly agreed they would self-test. Similarly, the majority were willing to report their self-testing results (88%, 98% and 96% at baseline and mid- and end-points, respectively). Weekly reporting of test results to the national COVID-19 database was high during all the implementation. There were 622 COVID-19 positive results reported, and linked to care, from 601 individuals (282 participants and 319 household members). Findings from qualitative interviews showed great satisfaction with self-testing for its convenience, ease of use, trust in the results, no need to travel for diagnostics, and increased perception of safety.

Conclusions

Our findings contribute to the evidence-base regarding self-testing strategies conducted via workplaces and secondary distribution to households. Willingness to perform a COVID-19 self-test increased after implementation. This pilot enhanced pandemic preparedness through expansion of the national self-testing reporting system, development of communications materials, changes in the national legal framework and coordination mechanisms, and improved perceptions around self-care in the community. The lessons learnt can inform operational aspects of the introduction and scale-up of self-care strategies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: interim guidance, 6 October 2021 (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/Antigen_Detection/2021.1). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. World Health Organization. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: interim guidance, 6 October 2021 (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/Antigen_Detection/2021.1). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
3.
go back to reference Tripathi SC, Deshmukh V, Patil A, Tripathy JP. COVID 19 diagnostic multiplicity and its role in community surveillance and control. Le Infez Med. 2020;28:18–28. Tripathi SC, Deshmukh V, Patil A, Tripathy JP. COVID 19 diagnostic multiplicity and its role in community surveillance and control. Le Infez Med. 2020;28:18–28.
7.
go back to reference WHO. Use of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 self-testing. Interim guidance. 9 March 2022. WHO reference number: WHO/2019-nCoV/Ag-RDTs/Self_testing/2022.1. WHO. Use of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 self-testing. Interim guidance. 9 March 2022. WHO reference number: WHO/2019-nCoV/Ag-RDTs/Self_testing/2022.1.
10.
go back to reference Shilton S, Ivanova Reipold E, Roca Álvarez A, Martínez-Pérez GZ. Assessing values and preferences toward SARS-CoV-2 self-testing among the general population and their representatives, health care personnel, and decision-makers: protocol for a multicountry mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10:e33088. https://doi.org/10.2196/33088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shilton S, Ivanova Reipold E, Roca Álvarez A, Martínez-Pérez GZ. Assessing values and preferences toward SARS-CoV-2 self-testing among the general population and their representatives, health care personnel, and decision-makers: protocol for a multicountry mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10:e33088. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2196/​33088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
22.
go back to reference NCDC. COVID-19 Georgia. COVID-19 Report of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health 2020–2021. Tbilisi: The 8th Revision; 2022. NCDC. COVID-19 Georgia. COVID-19 Report of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health 2020–2021. Tbilisi: The 8th Revision; 2022.
23.
25.
go back to reference Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res. 2008;8:137–52.CrossRef Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res. 2008;8:137–52.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81:4–13. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81:4–13.
30.
go back to reference International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). Step 4 version dated 9 November 2016. Available at: https://database. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). Step 4 version dated 9 November 2016. Available at: https://​database.​
31.
go back to reference Marinos G, Lamprinos D, Georgakopoulos P, Oikonomou E, Zoumpoulis G, Garmpis N, et al. Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes and practices related to self-testing procedure against COVID-19 among greek students: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084559. Marinos G, Lamprinos D, Georgakopoulos P, Oikonomou E, Zoumpoulis G, Garmpis N, et al. Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes and practices related to self-testing procedure against COVID-19 among greek students: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ijerph19084559.
Metadata
Title
Implementing a pilot study of COVID-19 self-testing in high-risk populations and remote locations: results and lessons learnt
Authors
Elena Marbán-Castro
Vladimer Getia
Maia Alkhazashvili
Maia Japaridze
Ia Jikia
Berra Erkosar
Paula Del Rey-Puech
Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
Paata Imnadze
Amiran Gamkrelidze
Olga Denisiuk
Elena Ivanova Reipold
Sonjelle Shilton
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17930-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue