Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Disability and loneliness in the United Kingdom: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of trends and transitions

Authors: Eric Emerson, Roger J. Stancliffe, Zoe Aitken, Jodie Bailie, Glenda M. Bishop, Hannah Badland, Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Anne M. Kavanagh

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Loneliness can have a detrimental impact on health, yet little is known about the association between disability and loneliness.

Methods

Secondary analysis of three waves of data collected between 2017 and 2020 by the UK’s annual household panel study, Understanding Society. Direct age-standardisation was used to compare the prevalence of loneliness at each wave and the persistence of loneliness across all three waves for participants with/without disabilities aged 16–65 years. Transitional probabilities for the stability of loneliness, the stability of non-loneliness, the onset of loneliness and the offset of loneliness between consecutive waves were also estimated.

Results

At each wave, the prevalence of loneliness was significantly higher among respondents with disabilities than respondents without disabilities; these inequalities persisted with no evidence of change over time. The prevalence of persistent loneliness was 46% for respondents with disabilities compared with 22% for respondents without disabilities. Risk factors for the likelihood of persistent loneliness included disability, financial stress, not living as a couple, living in rented accommodation, being female and not being employed. The probability of the onset and stability of loneliness between successive waves were markedly higher for people with disabilities compared with people without disabilities.

Conclusion

Adults with disabilities were more likely to experience loneliness, become lonely and remain lonely over time than their peers. Policies and interventions aimed at reducing loneliness should ensure that they are accessible and effective for people with disabilities. Further research is needed to explore the health outcomes of persistent loneliness among people with/without disabilities.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Berkman LF, Krishna A. Social network epidemiology. In: Social Epidemiology edn. Edited by Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014: 234–289.
2.
Badcock J, Holt-Lunstad J, Garcia EPB, Lim M. Position statement: addressing social isolation and loneliness and the power of human connection. In. Global Initiative on Loneliness and Connection (GILC); 2022. https://​www.​gilc.​global/​.
3.
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a Meta-Analytic Review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:227–37.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary Heart Disease and Stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 2016:1009–16.
5.
Wang J, Mann F, Lloyd-Evans B, Ma R, Johnson S. Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18.
6.
Vingelienea S, Hiyoshia A, Lentjesa M, Falla K, Montgomery S. Longitudinal analysis of loneliness and inflammation at older ages: English longitudinal study of ageing. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;110:104421.CrossRef
7.
Akhter-Khan S, Tao Q, Ang T, Itchapurapu I, Alosco M, Mez J, Piers R, Steffens D, Au R, Qiu W. Associations of loneliness with risk of Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia in the Framingham Heart Study. Alzheimers & Dementia. 2021;17:1619–27.CrossRef
8.
Crowe C, Domingue B, Graf G, Keyes K, Kwon D, Belsky D. Associations of loneliness and social isolation with Health Span and Life Span in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study. Journals of Gerontology: Medical Sciences. 2021;76(11):1997–2006.
9.
Tao Q, Akhter-Khan S, Ang T, DeCarli C, Alosco M, Mez J, Killiany R, Devine S, Rokach A, Itchapurapu I, et al. Different loneliness types, cognitive function, and brain structure in midlife: findings from the Framingham Heart Study. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;53:101643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Chu B-L, Zhang W. Impact of transient and chronic loneliness on progression and reversion of frailty in community–dwelling older adults: four–year follow–up. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Shiovitz-Ezra S, Erlich B. Loneliness patterns and sleep problems after the initial outbreak of COVID-19: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Educ Gerontol. 2023;49(1):27–37.CrossRef
12.
Buecker S, Mund M, Chwastek S, Sostmann M, Luhmann M. Is loneliness in emerging adults increasing over time? A preregistered cross-temporal meta-analysis and systematic review. Psychol Bull. 2021;147(8):787–805.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Ernst M, Niederer D, Werner AM, Czaja S, Mikton C, Ong A, Rosen T, Brähler T, Beutel M. Loneliness Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. American Psychologist 2022 online early.
14.
Dahlberg L, McKee KJ, Frank A, Naseer M. A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2022;26(2):225–49.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Na P, Straus E, Tsai J, Norman S, Southwick S, Pietrzak R. Loneliness in U.S. military veterans during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationally representative, prospective cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;151:546–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Kotwal A, Batio S, Opsasnick L, Wolf M, Covinsky K, O’Conor R. Persistent loneliness over 15 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70:3469–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Nuyen J, Tuithof M, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Kleinjan M, ten Have M. The bidirectional relationship between loneliness and common mental disorders in adults: findings from a longitudinal population–based cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55:1297–310.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Emerson E, Fortune N, Llewellyn G, Stancliffe R. Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: cross sectional study. Disability and Health Journal 2020 online.
20.
Emerson E, Stancliffe R, Fortune N, Llewellyn G. Disability, loneliness and health in the UK: cross sectional study. Eur J Pub Health. 2021;31(3):533–8.CrossRef
21.
Ipsen C, Repke M. Reaching people with disabilities to learn about their experiences of social connection and loneliness. Disabil Health J. 2022;15:101220.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Macdonald SJ, Deacon L, Nixon J, Akintola A, Gillingham A, Kent J, Ellis G, Mathews D, Ismail A, Sullivan S, et al. The invisible enemy’: disability, loneliness and isolation. Disabil Soc. 2018;33:1138–59.CrossRef
23.
McGlone M, Long E. Are young adults with long-standing Illness or disability at increased risk of loneliness? Evidence from the UK Longitudinal Household Study. J Public Health Res. 2020;9:1861.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
McMaughan D, Rhoads K, Davis C, Chen X, Han H, Jones R, Mahaffey C, Miller B. COVID-19 related experiences among College Students with and without disabilities: psychosocial impacts, supports, and virtual learning environments. Front Public Health. 2021;9:782793.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Na L, Yang L. Psychological and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic among individuals with mobility and/or self-care disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2022;15:101216.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Pagan R. Examining transitions in loneliness for people without and with moderate and severe disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(12):2733–43.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Mithen J, Aitken Z, Ziersch A, Kavanagh AM. Inequalities in social capital and health between people with and without disabilities. Soc Sci Med. 2015;126:26–35.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Emerson E, Llewellyn G, Honey A, Kariuki M. Lower well-being of young Australian adults with self-reported disability reflects their poorer living conditions rather than health issues. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2012;36:176–82.CrossRef
30.
Duplaga M. The Association of Internet Use withWellbeing, Mental Health and Health Behaviours of persons with disabilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Hall J, Kurth N, Goddard K. Assessing factors associated with social connectedness in adults with mobility disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2022;15:101206.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Qualter P, Arseneault L, Barreto M, Fett A, Hey N, Johnson S, Kharicha K, Matthews T, McDaid D, Pearce E, et al. Tackling loneliness evidence review: main report. In. London: Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport; 2022.
33.
Carpenter H, UK Household Longitudinal Study. Wave 11 technical report. In. London: Kantar, Publc Division; 2021.
34.
Institute for Social and Economic Research. Main Survey user guide. Colchester, Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex; 2021.
35.
Carpenter H, UK Household Longitudinal Study. Wave 9 technical report. In. London: Kantar, Publc Division; 2019.
36.
Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two Population-Based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26:655–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport. A connected society A strategy for tackling loneliness – laying the foundations for change. In. London: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport; 2018.
38.
Thurber K, Thandrayen J, Maddox R, Barrett E, Walker J, Priest N, Korda R, Banks E, Williams D, Lovett R. Reflection on modern methods: statistical, policy and ethical implications of using age-standardized health indicators to quantify inequities. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(1):324–33.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Williamson E, Aitken Z, Lawrie J, Dharmage H, Burgess J, Forbes A. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection. Respirology. 2014;19:303–11.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Lim M, Eres R, Vasan S. Understanding loneliness in the twenty–first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55:793–810.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Emerson E, Madden R, Graham H, Llewellyn G, Hatton C, Robertson J. The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health. Public Health. 2011;125:145–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Wormald A, McCallion P, McCarron M. The antecedents of loneliness in older people with an intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2019;85:116–30.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Metadata
Title
Disability and loneliness in the United Kingdom: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of trends and transitions
Authors
Eric Emerson
Roger J. Stancliffe
Zoe Aitken
Jodie Bailie
Glenda M. Bishop
Hannah Badland
Gwynnyth Llewellyn
Anne M. Kavanagh
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17481-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Public Health 1/2023 Go to the issue

Research

The association of healthy lifestyle score and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Research

Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

Research

Development and validation of the Teen Moms Child Feeding Questionnaire for Sub-Saharan Africa

Research

Modeling potential risk areas of Orthohantavirus transmission in Northwestern Argentina using an ecological niche approach

Research

From design to action: participatory approach to capacity building needs for local overdose response plans

Research

Prevalence of anemia and its associated factors among children aged 6–23 months, in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta analysis