Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Child socioemotional behavior and adult temperament as predictors of physical activity and sedentary behavior in late adulthood

Authors: Johanna Ahola, Katja Kokko, Lea Pulkkinen, Tiia Kekäläinen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Most studies investigating the association of temperament with physical activity and sedentary behavior have examined children or adolescents, employed cross-sectional or longitudinal designs that do not extend from childhood into adulthood, and utilized self- or parent-reported data on physical activity and sedentary behavior. This longitudinal study investigated whether socioemotional behavior in childhood and temperament in middle adulthood predict accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in late adulthood.

Methods

This study was based on the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality and Social Development (JYLS). Socioemotional behavior (behavioral activity, well-controlled behavior, negative emotionality) was assessed at age 8 based on teacher ratings, whereas temperament (surgency, effortful control, negative affectivity, orienting sensitivity) was assessed at age 42 based on self-rating. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior were assessed at age 61 using an accelerometer. Data (N = 142) were analyzed using linear regression analysis.

Results

In women, behavioral activity at age 8 predicted higher levels of daily sedentary behavior at age 61. The association did not remain statistically significant after controlling for participant’s occupational status. In addition, women’s negative affectivity at age 42 predicted lower daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at age 61, particularly during leisure time. No statistically significant results were observed in men.

Conclusions

Although few weak associations of socioemotional behavior and temperament with physical activity and sedentary behavior were detected in women, they were observed over several decades, and thus, deserve attention in future studies. In addition to other factors contributing to physical activity and sedentary behavior, health professionals may be sensitive to individual characteristics, such as a tendency to experience more negative emotions, when doing health counseling or planning for health-promoting interventions targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Dempsey PC, Biddle SJ, Buman MP, Chastin S, Ekelund U, Friedenreich CM, et al. New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:151.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S.: Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
3.
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1077–86.PubMedCrossRef
4.
World Health Organization. Global status report on physical activity 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
5.
Bauman AE, Petersen CB, Blond K, Rangul V, Hardy LL. The descriptive epidemiology of sedentary behaviour. In: Leitzmann MF, Jochem C, Schmid D, editors. Sedentary Behaviour Epidemiology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 73–106.CrossRef
6.
Nguyen P, Le LK-D, Ananthapavan J, Gao L, Dunstan DW, Moodie M. Economics of sedentary behaviour: a systematic review of cost of illness, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment studies. Prev Med. 2022;156:106964.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - terminology cxonsensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:75.
9.
Rosenberger ME, Fulton JE, Buman MP, Troiano RP, Grandner MA, Buchner DM, et al. The 24-hour activity cycle: a new paradigm for physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:454–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
López-Valenciano A, Mayo X, Liguori G, Copeland RJ, Lamb M, Jimenez A. Changes in sedentary behaviour in European Union adults between 2002 and 2017. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1206.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, et al. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19657.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
13.
Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, Ekelund U, Freedson PS, Gary RA, et al. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:2259–79.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Cheng W, Zhang Z, Cheng W, Yang C, Diao L, Liu W. Associations of leisure-time physical activity with cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 prospective cohort studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:1864–72.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Coenen P, Huysmans MA, Holtermann A, Krause N, van Mechelen W, Straker LM, et al. Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1320–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
Kokko K, Pulkkinen L, Puustinen M. Selection into long-term unemployment and its psychological consequences. Int J Behav Dev. 2000;24:310–20.CrossRef
18.
Pulkkinen L, Kokko K, Rantanen J. Paths from socioemotional behavior in middle childhood to personality in middle adulthood. Dev Psychol. 2012;48:1283–91.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Rothbart MK, Ahadi SA, Evans DE. Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78:122–35.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Pitkänen L. A descriptive model of aggression and non-aggression with applications to children’s behaviour. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, No. 19. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä; 1969.
21.
22.
Evans DE, Rothbart MK. Developing a model for adult temperament. J Res Personal. 2007;41:868–88.CrossRef
23.
Leppänen MH, Kaseva K, Pajulahti R, Sääksjärvi K, Mäkynen E, Engberg E, et al. Temperament, physical activity and sedentary time in preschoolers – the DAGIS study. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:129.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Sharp JR, Maguire JL, Carsley S, Abdullah K, Chen Y, Perrin EM, et al. Temperament is associated with outdoor free play in young children: a TARGet kids! Study. Acad Pediatr. 2018;18:445–51.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Song M, Corwyn RF, Bradley RH, Lumeng JC. Temperament and physical activity in childhood. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14:837–44.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Yang X, Kaseva K, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Pulkki-Råback L, Hirvensalo M, Jokela M, et al. Does childhood temperamental activity predict physical activity and sedentary behavior over a 30-year period? Evidence from the Young Finns Study. IntJ Behav Med. 2017;24:171–9.CrossRef
27.
Määttä S, Konttinen H, de Oliveira Figueiredo RA, Haukkala A, Sajaniemi N, Erkkola M, et al. Individual-, home- and preschool-level correlates of preschool children’s sedentary time. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Janssen JA, Kolacz J, Shanahan L, Gangel MJ, Calkins SD, Keane SP, et al. Childhood temperament predictors of adolescent physical activity. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Karvonen J, Törmäkangas T, Pulkkinen L, Kokko K. Associations of temperament and personality traits with frequency of physical activity in adulthood. J Res Personal. 2020;84:103887.CrossRef
30.
Korczak DJ, Madigan S, Colasanto M, Szatmari P, Chen Y, Maguire J, et al. The longitudinal association between temperament and physical activity in young children. Prev Med. 2018;111:342–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kokko K, Fadjukoff P, Reinilä E, Ahola J, Kauppinen M, Kinnunen M-L et al. Developmental perspectives on transitions at age 60: individuals navigating across the lifespan (TRAILS)—Latest data collection in a longitudinal JYLS study [Manuscript submitted for publication].
32.
Pulkkinen L, Fyrstén S, Kinnunen U, Kinnunen M-L, Pitkänen T, Kokko K. 40 + Erään ikäluokan selviytymistarina [40 + a successful transition to middle adulthood in a cohort of Finns]. Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä; 2003.
33.
Dobbie LJ, Hydes TJ, Alam U, Tahrani A, Cuthbertson DJ. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mobility trends and the associated rise in population-level physical inactivity: insights from international mobile phone and national survey data. Front Sports Act Living. 2022;4:773742.
34.
Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, Husu P, Suni J, Sievänen H. A universal, accurate intensity‐based classification of different physical activities using raw data of accelerometer. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015;35:64–70.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, Husu P, Mänttäri A, Vuorimaa T, Suni J, et al. Validation of cut-points for evaluating the intensity of physical activity with accelerometry-based mean amplitude deviation (MAD). PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0134813.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, Delisle Nyström C, Mora-Gonzalez J, Löf M, et al. Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity and other outcomes: a systematic review and practical considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47:1821–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Ahola A, Djerf K, Heiskanen M, Vikki K, Elinolotutkimus. 1994: Aineiston keruu [Survey on Living Conditions 1994]. Tilastokeskus; 1995;2.
38.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
39.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.
40.
Hampson SE, Goldberg LR, Vogt TM, Dubanoski JP. Forty years on: teachers’ assessments of children’s personality traits predict self-reported health behaviors and outcomes at midlife. Health Psychol. 2006;25:57–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Pulkkinen L, Ohranen M, Tolvanen A. Personality antecedents of career orientation and stability among women compared to men. J Vocat Behav. 1999;54:37–58.CrossRef
42.
Stamatakis E, Coombs N, Rowlands A, Shelton N, Hillsdon M. Objectively-assessed and self-reported sedentary time in relation to multiple socioeconomic status indicators among adults in England: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006034.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Kekäläinen T, Laakkonen EK, Terracciano A, Savikangas T, Hyvärinen M, Tammelin TH, et al. Accelerometer-measured and self-reported physical activity in relation to extraversion and neuroticism: a cross-sectional analysis of two studies. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:264.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Wilson K, Dishman R. Personality and physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personal Individ Differ. 2015;72:230–42.CrossRef
45.
Wilson K, Rhodes R. Personality and physical activity. In: Zenko Z, Jones L, editors. Essentials of exercise and sport psychology: an open access textbook. Society for the Transparency, Openness, and Replication in Kinesiology; 2021. pp. 114–49.
46.
Courneya KS, Hellsten L-AM. Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers and preferences: an application of the five-factor model. Personal Individ Differ. 1998;24:625–33.CrossRef
47.
Kekäläinen T, Tammelin TH, Hagger MS, Lintunen T, Hyvärinen M, Kujala UM, et al. Personality, motivational, and social cognition predictors of leisure-time physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2022;60:102135.CrossRef
48.
Choi J, Lee M, Lee J, Kang D, Choi J-Y. Correlates associated with participation in physical activity among adults: a systematic review of reviews and update. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:356.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
O’Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, Bernaards C, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:163.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
51.
52.
Pépin JL, Bruno RM, Yang R-Y, Vercamer V, Jouhaud P, Escourrou P, et al. Wearable activity trackers for monitoring adherence to home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide: data aggregation and analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e19787.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Husu P, Tokola K, Vähä-Ypyä H, Sievänen H, Suni J, Heinonen OJ, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and time in bed among finnish adults measured 24/7 by triaxial accelerometry. J Meas Phys Behav. 2021;4:163–73.CrossRef
54.
Metadata
Title
Child socioemotional behavior and adult temperament as predictors of physical activity and sedentary behavior in late adulthood
Authors
Johanna Ahola
Katja Kokko
Lea Pulkkinen
Tiia Kekäläinen
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16110-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Public Health 1/2023 Go to the issue

Research

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing nutritious meal kits and no-prep meals to improve food security and diet quality among food pantry clients

Research article

The Healthy Democracy Kit: design, implementation, uptake, and impact of a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings

Correction

Correction to: Exploring the relationship between breastfeeding and the incidence of infant illnesses in Ireland: evidence from a nationally representative prospective cohort study

Research

Parental technoference and adolescents’ mental health and violent behaviour: a scoping review

Research

Exploring targeted preventive health check interventions – a realist synthesis

Research

The impact of geo-political socio-economic factors on vaccine dissemination trends: a case-study on COVID-19 vaccination strategies