Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Anxiety | Research

Pregnancy intentions of young women in Canada in the era of climate change: a qualitative auto-photography study

Authors: Danielle M. Smith, Javier Sales, Aleyah Williams, Sarah Munro

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Climate change poses a global health risk through consequences such as sea level rise, wildfires, and increased air pollution. Children born today and in the future may be disproportionately affected by climate change. As a result, many young adults are rethinking having children. The impacts of the climate crisis on the decision-making of parents is an understudied area of research. This study aims to be one of the first to explore how climate change impacts the pregnancy intentions of young women in Canada and their perspectives towards childbearing.

Methods

We conducted auto-photography and qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited using social media, and were aged 18–25, nulliparous, assigned female at birth, and were either current or previous residents of British Columbia, Canada. We asked participants to take photos that responded to the question, “Show us how climate change impacts your decision to have a family,” then complete a virtual, one-on-one interview during which photo-elicitation was employed to guide conversation about participants’ decision-making related to childbearing and climate change. We subjected all transcribed interviews to qualitative thematic analysis.

Results

We conducted in-depth interviews with seven participants who discussed a total of 33 photographs. Analysis of participants’ interviews and photographs identified themes of eco-anxiety, hesitancy towards having children, sense of loss, and a desire for systemic change. Participants experienced anxiety, grief, and loss when faced with thoughts of change associated with their environments. Climate change impacted all but two participants’ childbearing decision making, which was found to be interrelated with social-environmental factors, such as cost of living.

Conclusion

We aimed to identify the ways in which climate change may impact youth decisions to have a family. Further research on this topic is needed to understand the prevalence of this phenomenon, and to build such considerations into climate action policy and family planning tools used among young people.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Berry H, et al. The 2018 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. The Lancet. 2018;392(10163):2479–514.CrossRef
2.
The Lancet. Health and climate change: making the link matter. The Lancet. 2019;394(10211):1780.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Nakkerud E. “There Are Many People Like Me, Who Feel They Want to Do Something Bigger”: An Exploratory Study of Choosing Not to Have Children Based on Environmental Concerns. https://​home.​liebertpub.​com/​eco. 2021 Mar 25.
8.
Helm S, Kemper JA, White SK. No future, no kids–no kids, no future? Population and Environment 2021 43:1. 2021 Mar 16;43(1):108–29.
9.
Murtaugh PA, Schlax MG. Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals. Glob Environ Change. 2009;19(1):14–20.CrossRef
10.
Greer G. To have or not to have: the critical importance of reproductive rights to the paradox of population policies in the 21st century. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106(2):148–50.CrossRef
11.
Rich S, Haintz GL, McKenzie H, Graham M. Factors that Shape Women’s Reproductive Decision-Making: A Scoping Review. Journal of Research in Gender Studies [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Feb 22];11(2):9–32. Available from: https://​go.​gale.​com/​ps/​i.​do?​p=​AONE&​sw=​w&issn=21640262&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA691891007&sid=googleScholar&linkaccess=fulltext.
12.
13.
Settle B, Brumley K. It’s the Choices you make that get you There”: decision-making pathways of Childfree Women. Mich Family Rev. 2014 Dec;18(1):1.
14.
15.
16.
Arnocky S, Dupuis D, Stroink ML. Environmental concern and fertility intentions among canadian university students. Popul Environ. 2012;34(2):279–92.CrossRef
17.
18.
Cunsolo A, Derr V, Doherty T, Kotcher J, Silka L, Mitchell GJ. Mental Health and Our Changing Climate. Am Acad Pediatr. 2018;(March):13–28.
19.
Ingle HE, Mikulewicz M. Mental health and climate change: tackling invisible injustice. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(4):e128–30.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Obradovich N, Migliorini R, Paulus MP, Rahwan I. Empirical evidence of mental health risks posed by climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(43):10953–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Hickman C, Marks E, Pihkala P, Clayton S, Lewandowski RE, Mayall EE et al. Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Dec 1;5(12):e863–73.
22.
Cunsolo Willox A, Harper SL, Ford JD, Landman K, Houle K, Edge VL. From this place and of this place:” Climate change, sense of place, and health in Nunatsiavut, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(3):538–47.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Bryant RA, Waters E, Gibbs L, Gallagher HC, Pattison P, Lusher D, et al. Psychological outcomes following the victorian black Saturday bushfires. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014;48(7):634–43.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kessler RC, Galea S, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Ursane RJ, Wessely S. Trends in Mental Health illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13(4):374–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Thomas ME. Autophotography Elsevier. 2009. 1–8 p.
26.
27.
Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychol. 2022 May;13(1):3–26.
28.
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qual Health Res 2016 Nov 1;26(13):1753–60.
29.
30.
Glaw X, Inder K, Kable A, Hazelton M. Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. https://​doi.​org/​101177/​1609406917748215​.​ 2017 Dec 19;16(1).
31.
32.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
33.
Albrecht G. Solastalgia and the creation of New Ways of living. Routledge; 2010. pp. 235–52.
34.
Bodin M, Björklund J, “Can. I take responsibility for bringing a person to this world who will be part of the apocalypse!?”: Ideological dilemmas and concerns for future well-being when bringing the climate crisis into reproductive decision-making. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Jan 7];302. Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​35468522/​.
35.
Provencher C, Milan A, Hallman S, Aoust CD’. Report on the Demographic Situation in Canada. Statistics Canada [Internet]. 2018; Available from: www.statcan.gc.ca.
36.
Morell C. Saying no: women’s experiences with Reproductive Refusal. Fem Psychol. 2000;10(3):313–22.CrossRef
37.
Wu J, Snell G, Samji H. Climate anxiety in young people: a call to action. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(10):e435–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Health C, on E. Global climate change and children’s health. Vol. 136, Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2015. pp. 992–7.
39.
Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 12;4(4).
Metadata
Title
Pregnancy intentions of young women in Canada in the era of climate change: a qualitative auto-photography study
Authors
Danielle M. Smith
Javier Sales
Aleyah Williams
Sarah Munro
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15674-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Public Health 1/2023 Go to the issue

Research

Drowning rates among children and adolescents (aged 7–17) in Israel during the years 2008–2018

Research

Spatial heterogeneity of socio-economic determinants of typhoid/paratyphoid fever in one province in central China from 2015 to 2019

Research

Self-rated health status and associated factors in rural workers

Research

Migration and health study: a socio-ecological analysis of sexual health among migrants in Manitoba, Canada

Research

Demographic dividend-favorable policy environment in two pre-dividend African nations: review of national policies and prospects for policy amendments in Nigeria and Tanzania

Study Protocol

The MEDITAGING study: protocol of a two-armed randomized controlled study to compare the effects of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program against a health promotion program in older migrants in Luxembourg