Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Embracing challenging complexity: exploring handwashing behavior from a combined socioecological and intersectional perspective in Sierra Leone

Authors: Hanna Luetke Lanfer, Doreen Reifegerste

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Handwashing with soap is a cost-effective, efficient health behavior to prevent various diseases. Despite its immense health benefits, the lowest prevalence of handwashing is found in low-income countries. Here, its practice is not only determined by individual behavior, but also heavily shaped by deprivations in the social and structural ecology. Moreover, handwashing barriers are not equally experienced as overlapping social identities (e.g., age and gender) intersect and create inequities between members of different social groups. To embrace the complexities of handwashing beyond individual-level behavior and singular social identities, a combined socioecological and intersectional perspective is employed. This multi-level approach with regards to intersecting privileges and disadvantages serves as a basis to promote this highly important health behavior.

Methods

This study used a qualitative, theory-based approach and combined data from two samples: experts in health promotion (n = 22) and local citizens stratified by gender and rural/urban location (n = 56). Data was collected in face-to-face interviews in Sierra Leone between November 2018 and January 2019 and analyzed using thematic analysis and typology of the qualitative data.

Results

The conceptualization of multi-level determinants of handwashing within a socioecological model showed the high relevance of inhibiting social and structural factors for handwashing practice. By establishing seven distinguishing social identity dimensions, data demonstrates that individuals within the same social setting yet with distinct social identities experience strikingly differing degrees of power and privileges to enact handwashing. While a local leader is influential and may also change structural-level determinants, a young, rural wife experiences multiple social and structural constraints to perform handwashing with soap, even if she has high handwashing intentions.

Conclusion

This study provides a holistic analytical framework for the identification of determinants on multiple levels and accumulating intersections of socially produced inequalities for handwashing and is applicable to other health topics. As the exploration of handwashing was approached from a solution-focused instead of a problem-focused perspective, the analysis can guide multi-level intervention approaches (e.g., using low-cost, participatory activities at the community level to make use of the available social capital).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
“Tomorrow” is an often-used expression in Krio to refer to an unknown point in time in the future or never.
 
Literature
1.
Parida SP, Bhatia V. Handwashing: a household social vaccine against COVID 19 and multiple communicable diseases. Int J Res Med Sci. 2020;8(7):2708.
2.
Townsend J, Greenland K, Curtis V. Costs of diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection attributable to not handwashing: the cases of India and China. Tropical Med Int Health. 2017;22(1):74–81.
3.
Bartram J, Cairncross S. Hygiene, sanitation, and water: forgotten foundations of health. PLoS Med. 2010;7(11):e1000367.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Amegah AK. Improving handwashing habits and household air quality in Africa after COVID-19. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1110–1.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Roche R, Bain R, Cumming O. A long way to go - estimates of combined water, sanitation and hygiene coverage for 25 sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171783.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Freeman MC, Stocks ME, Cumming O, Jeandron A, Higgins JPT, Wolf J, et al. Hygiene and health: systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects. Tropical Med Int Health. 2014;19(8):906–16.
7.
8.
Seimetz E, Boyayo A-M, Mosler H-J. The influence of contextual and psychosocial factors on handwashing. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(6):1407–17.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Cavill S, Hugget C. Good mums: a gender equality perspective on the constructions of the mother in handwashing campaigns. wH2O: the journal of gender and. Water. 2020;7(1):26–36.
10.
Rajaraman D, Varadharajan KS, Greenland K, Curtis V, Kumar R, Schmidt W-P, et al. Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1179.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Taddese AA, Dagnew B, Dagne H, Andualem Z. Mother's handwashing practices and health outcomes of under-five children in Northwest Ethiopia. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2020;11:101–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Curtis VA, Danquah LO, Aunger RV. Planned, motivated and habitual hygiene behaviour: an eleven country review. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(4):655–73.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Humphrey JH. Reducing the user burden in WASH interventions for low-income countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(9):e1158–9.PubMed
14.
15.
16.
White S, Thorseth AH, Dreibelbis R, Curtis V. The determinants of handwashing behaviour in domestic settings: an integrative systematic review. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;227:113512.PubMed
17.
Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, mass. London: Harvard University Press; 1981.
18.
Mahmudiono T, Segalita C, Rosenkranz RR. Socio-Ecological Model of Correlates of Double Burden of Malnutrition in Developing Countries: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3730–53.
19.
Townsend N, Foster C. Developing and applying a socio-ecological model to the promotion of healthy eating in the school. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(6):1101–8.PubMed
20.
Golden SD, Earp JAL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(3):364–72.PubMed
21.
Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Health behavior: theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2015. p. 43–64.
22.
Onono M, Kwena Z, Turan J, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Gray GE. "You Know You Are Sick, Why Do You Carry A Pregnancy Again?" Applying the Socio-Ecological Model to Understand Barriers to PMTCT Service Utilization in Western Kenya. J AIDS Clin Res. 2015;6(6):467–75.
23.
Hill J, Mchiza Z, Puoane T, Steyn NP. The development of an evidence-based street food vending model within a socioecological framework: a guide for African countries. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223535.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Parkinson J, Mkandawire PC, Dietrich T, Badejo A, Kadir M, Tembo V. Developing the UNICEF Malawi school handwashing program. Soc Mark Q. 2018;24(2):74–88.
25.
Staniford LJ, Schmidtke KA. A systematic review of hand-hygiene and environmental-disinfection interventions in settings with children. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):195.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Niederberger E, Glanville-Wallis T. Community engagement in WASH emergencies: understanding barriers and enablers based on action research from Bangladesh and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Water. 2019;11(4):862.
27.
Namara F, Omona K, Mbabazi S. Barriers and motivators to participation in hand washing promotion programs at household level among refugees in Rhino Settlement, Arua District _ Uganda. Cogent Med. 2020;7(1):1757184.
28.
Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum. 1989;1989(1):139–67.
29.
Cochrane L, Rao N. Is the push for gender sensitive research advancing the SDG agenda of leaving no one behind? Forum Dev Stud. 2019;46(1):45–65.
30.
Hill Collins P, Bilge S. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2016. (Key concepts series)
31.
Bowleg L. The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1267–73.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Gkiouleka A, Huijts T, Beckfield J, Bambra C. Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: inequalities, intersectionality & institutions - a research agenda. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:92–8.PubMed
33.
Bauer GR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med. 2014;110:10–7.PubMed
34.
Springer KW, Mager Stellman J, Jordan-Young RM. Beyond a catalogue of differences: a theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1817–24.PubMed
35.
Warner DF, Brown TH. Understanding how race/ethnicity and gender define age-trajectories of disability: an intersectionality approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(8):1236–48.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Borras AM. Toward an intersectional approach to health justice. Int J Health Serv. 2020;51(2):20731420981857.
37.
Dickin S, Bisung E, Nansi J, Charles K. Empowerment in water, sanitation and hygiene index. World Dev. 2021;137:105158.
38.
MacArthur J, Carrard N, Willetts J. WASH and gender: a critical review of the literature and implications for gender-transformative WASH research. J Water Sanitation Hyg Dev. 2020;10(4):818–27.
39.
McCollum R, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L, Tolhurst R, Mireku M, Martineau T, et al. Applying an intersectionality lens to examine health for vulnerable individuals following devolution in Kenya. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):24.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Ekumah B, Armah FA, Yawson DO, Quansah R, Nyieku FE, Owusu SA, et al. Disparate on-site access to water, sanitation, and food storage heighten the risk of COVID-19 spread in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Res. 2020;189:109936.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Mitra A, Rao N. Gender, water, and nutrition in India: an intersectional perspective. Water Alternatives. 2019;12(1):169–91.
42.
Kamara JK, Galukande M, Maeda F, Luboga S, AMN R. Understanding the Challenges of Improving Sanitation and Hygiene Outcomes in a Community Based Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6):602–18.
43.
Lund Schlamovitz J, Becker P. Differentiated vulnerabilities and capacities for adaptation to water shortage in Gaborone, Botswana. Int J Water Resources Dev. 2020;37(2):278–99.
44.
Levine A, Breshears B. Discrimination at every turn: an intersectional ecological lens for rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2019;64(2):146–53.PubMed
45.
Standley CJ. Expanding our paradigms: intersectional and socioecological approaches to suicide prevention. Death Stud. 2020:1–9.
46.
Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Mann A. The complexity of culture: using an intersectional and social ecological Lens to examine the impact of culture on health disparities. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72(8 Suppl 3):24.PubMedCentral
47.
Luetke Lanfer H. Through a Lens of Scarcity: Health Communication in a Low-Income Context. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2021.
48.
49.
Statistics Sierra Leone (2017). Sierra Leone 2015 Population and Housing Census: Thematic Report on Education and Literacy.
50.
51.
Statistics Sierra Leone (2016). 2015 population and housing census: summary of final results. Freetown.
52.
53.
Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012.
54.
55.
56.
57.
Prommer E. Clusteranalysen und qualitative interviews: Typenbildung durch “mixed-methods”. In: Scheu AM, editor. Auswertung qualitativer Daten. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2018. p. 247–59.
58.
59.
Ssemugabo C, Halage AA, Namata C, Musoke D, Ssempebwa JC. A socio-ecological perspective of the facilitators and barriers to uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in a slum setting in Kampala, Uganda: a qualitative study. J Water Sanitation Hyg Dev. 2020;10(2):227–37. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2166/​washdev.​2020.​124.CrossRef
60.
61.
Ghosal S, Haque M, Mondal K, Acharya SK. Prediction of physical hygiene and substantive state of farm women: reckoning and conjecture of socio-ecological and bio-physical variables. J Community Mobilization Sustainable Dev. 2020;15(3):653–60.
62.
63.
Kuran CHA, Morsut C, Kruke BI, Krüger M, Segnestam L, Orru K, et al. Vulnerability and vulnerable groups from an intersectionality perspective. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020;50:101826.
64.
Blenner SR, Lang CM, Prelip ML. Shifting the culture around public health advocacy: training future public health professionals to be effective agents of change. Health Promot Pract. 2017;18(6):785–8.PubMed
65.
Beck AF, Edwards EM, Horbar JD, Howell EA, McCormick MC, Pursley DM. The color of health: how racism, segregation, and inequality affect the health and well-being of preterm infants and their families. Pediatr Res. 2020;87(2):227–34.PubMed
66.
Dierickx S, Rahbari L, Longman C, Jaiteh F, Coene G. 'I am always crying on the inside': a qualitative study on the implications of infertility on women's lives in urban Gambia. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):151.PubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Marshall K. Roles of religious actors in the west African Ebola response. Dev Pract. 2017;27(5):622–33.
68.
Toppenberg-Pejcic D, Noyes J, Allen T, Alexander N, Vanderford M, Gamhewage G. Emergency risk communication: lessons learned from a rapid review of recent gray literature on Ebola, Zika, and yellow fever. Health Commun. 2019;34(4):437–55.PubMed
69.
Downs JA, Mwakisole AH, Chandika AB, Lugoba S, Kassim R, Laizer E, et al. Educating religious leaders to promote uptake of male circumcision in Tanzania: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10074):1124–32.PubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Jalloh MF, Wilhelm E, Abad N, Prybylski D. Mobilize to vaccinate: lessons learned from social mobilization for immunization in low and middle-income countries. Hum Vaccin Immunotherapeutics. 2020;16(5):1208–14.
Metadata
Title
Embracing challenging complexity: exploring handwashing behavior from a combined socioecological and intersectional perspective in Sierra Leone
Authors
Hanna Luetke Lanfer
Doreen Reifegerste
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11923-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

A historical overview of legislated alcohol policy in the Northern Territory of Australia: 1979–2021

Research article

Perspectives of parents of working adolescents in Ontario, Canada

Research

Social determinants of health related to stay-at-home order adherence and social distancing attitudes among a diverse Deep South population

Research article

The role of managerial leadership in sickness absence in health and social care: antecedent or moderator in the association between psychosocial working conditions and register-based sickness absence? A longitudinal study based on a swedish cohort

Research article

The association of education in a new society and social support from the education with the health of North Korean defectors: a cross-sectional study

Research

Knowledge and transmission risk awareness of tuberculosis among the pilgrims attending a religious mass gathering in India: a cross-sectional study