Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Adoption and diffusion of zoning bylaws banning fast food drive-through services across Canadian municipalities

Authors: Candace I. J. Nykiforuk, Elizabeth J. Campbell, Soultana Macridis, Daniel McKennitt, Kayla Atkey, Kim D. Raine

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Healthy public policy is an important tool for creating environments that support human health and wellbeing. At the local level, municipal policies, such as zoning bylaws, provide an opportunity for governments to regulate building location and the type of services offered. Across North America, there has been a recent proliferation of municipal bylaws banning fast food drive-through services. Research on the utilization of this policy strategy, including bylaw adopters and adopter characteristics, is limited within the Canadian context. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize Canadian municipalities based on level of policy innovation and nature of their adopted bylaw banning fast food drive-through services.

Methods

A multiple case history methodology was utilized to identify and analyse eligible municipal bylaws, and included development of a chronological timeline and map of adopter municipalities within Canada. Grey literature and policy databases were searched for potential adopters of municipal fast food drive-through service bylaws. Adopters were confirmed through evidence of current municipal bylaws. Geographic diffusion and diffusion of innovations theories provided a contextual framework for analysis of bylaw documents. Analysis included assignment of adopter-types, extent and purpose of bans, and policy learning activities of each adopter municipality.

Results

From 2002 to 2016, 27 municipalities were identified as adopters: six innovators and twenty-one early adopters. Mapping revealed parallel geographic diffusion patterns in western and eastern Canada. Twenty-two municipalities adopted a partial ban and five adopted a full ban. Rationales for the drive-through bans included health promotion, environmental concerns from idling, community character and aesthetics, traffic concerns, and walkability. Policy learning, including research and consultation with other municipalities, was performed by nine early adopters.

Conclusion

This study detailed the adoption of fast food drive-through bylaws across Canada. Understanding the adopter-type characteristics of municipalities and the nature of their bylaws can assist other jurisdictions in similar policy efforts. While the implications for research and practice are evolving and dynamic, fast food drive-through service bans may play a role in promoting healthier food environments. Further research is required to determine the viability of this strategy for health promotion and chronic disease prevention.
Literature
1.
Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:253–72.CrossRefPubMed
2.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The surgeon General’s vision for a healthy and fit nation. 2010.
3.
Mair JS, Pierce MW, Teret SP. The use of zoning to restrict fast food outlets: a potential strategy to combat obesity. 2005.
4.
Nixon L, Mejia P, Dorfman L, Cheyne A, Young S, Friedman LC, Gottlieb MA, Wooten H. Fast-food fights: news coverage of local efforts to improve food environments through land-use regulations, 2001-2013. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:490–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Feldstein LM. Zoning and land use controls: beyond agriculture. Maine Law Review. 2013;65:467–90.
6.
Ashe M, Jernigan D, Kline R, Galaz R. Land use planning and the control of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and fast food restaurants. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1404–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Sallis JF, Glanz K. The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Futur Child. 2006;16:89–108.CrossRef
8.
Pomeranz JL, Gostin LO. Improving laws and legal authorities for obesity prevention and control. J Law Med Ethics. 2009;37:62–75.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Leib EMB. All (food) politics is local: increasing food access through local government action. Harvard Law Pol Rev. 2013;7:321–41.
10.
Rice T. Zoning and land use. Syracuse Law Review. 2013;63:1007–47.
11.
Shaffer A, Vallianatos M, Azuma AM, Gottlieb R. Changing the food environment: community engagement strategies and place-based policy tools that address the influence of marketing. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review. 2006;39:647–82.
12.
Spacht AC. The zoning diet: using restrictive zoning to shrink American waistlines. Notre Dame Law Review. 2009;85:391–418.
13.
Sturm R, Hattori A. Diet and obesity in Los Angeles County 2007-2012: is there a measurable effect of the 2008 “fast-food ban”? Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:205–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Wooten H, McLaughlin I, Chen L, Fry C. Zoning and licensing to regulate the retail environment and achieve public health goals. Duke Forum Law Soc Change. 2013;5:65–96.
15.
Gunneson CM. Why fast food bans are the wrong solution to address America's obesity problem and what should be done instead. Quinnipiac Health Law J. 2011;15:209–42.
16.
Gostin LO, Pomeranz JL, Jacobson PD, Gotyfried RN. Assessing laws and legal authorities for obesity prevention and control. J Law Med Ethics. 2009;37:28–36.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Davis JS. Fast food, zoning, and the dormant commerce clause: was it something I ate? Boston College Environ Affairs Law Review. 2008;35:259–88.
18.
Penfold S. “Are we to go literally to the hot dogs?” parking lots, drive-ins, and the critique of progress in Toronto's suburbs, 1965-1975. Urban Hist Rev. 2004;33:8–23.CrossRef
19.
Salkin PE. Municipal regulation of formula businesses: creating and protecting communities. Case Western Reserve Law Review. 2007;58:1251–87.
20.
Brenner K. Belle Terre and single-family home ordinances: judicial perceptions of local government and the presumption of validity. New York Univ Law Review. 1999;74:447–84.
21.
Burch DR, Bozung LJ, Miller AP, Hill GR. Land use controls: public use and private beneficiaries. Urban Lawyer. 1984;16:713–43.
22.
Ellis H. Neighbourhood opposition and the permissible purposes of zoning. J Land Use Environ Law. 1992;7:275–98.
23.
Botwinick D, Effron J, Huang J. Saving mom and pop: zoning and legislating for small and local business legislation. J Law Policy. 2010;18:607–53.
24.
Chen S, Florax RJGM, Snyder S, Miller CC. Obesity and access to chain grocers. Econ Geogr. 2010;86:431–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
26.
Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E. Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2010.CrossRef
27.
Olstad DL, Campbell EJ, Raine KD, Nykiforuk CI. A multiple case history and systematic review of adoption, diffusion, implementation and impact of provincial daily physical activity policies in Canadian schools. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:385.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Nolon JR. Land use for energy conservation and sustainable development: a new path toward climate change mitigation. J Land Use Environ Law. 2012:295–337.
29.
Vallianatos M. Food justice and food retail in Los Angeles. Ecology Law Currents. 2009;36:186–94.
30.
Dunlap AC. Come on feel the noise: the problem with municipal noise regulation. Univ Miami Business Law Review. 2007;15:47–74.
31.
32.
33.
City of Toronto. City of Toronto zoning by-law - by-law no. 569–2013. 2013.
34.
Town of Markham. BY-LAW 2003–151 A bylaw to amend the Urban Expansion Area Zoning Bylaw 17796, as amended. 2003.
35.
Town of Markham. Markham Zoning By-law 177–96. 2015.
36.
Town of Ajax. ZONING BY-LAW 95–2003 (office consolidation 31, 2014). 2003.
37.
City of Windsor. By-law number 375–2004 - a bylaw to further amend by-law number 8600 cited as the "Windsor Core area zoning by-law". 2004.
38.
City of Kelowna. City of Kelowna Momorandum (3360–20) TA02–0006. 2003.
39.
City of Vancouver. City of Vancouver Land use and Development Policies and Guidelines: Non-Industrial Uses (I-2 and M-2) Policies and Guidelines. 2006.
40.
City of Barrie. Comprehensive zoning by-law. 2009.
41.
City of Niagara Falls. By-law No. 2011–137. 2011.
42.
City of Hamilton. City of Hamilton bylaw no. 11–276 (housekeeping amendments to bylaw 05–200 (16 November 2011). 2011.
43.
Halifax Regional Municipality. Land use by-law downtown Halifax. 2014.
44.
City of Winnipeg. The City of Winnipeg By-Law NO. 200/2006. 2006.
45.
Town of Innisfil. Town of Innisfil Council Minutes (18 April 2012) - Zoning Bylaw Amendment 050–12. 2012.
46.
Town of Caledon. BY-LAW NO. BL-2012-094 - Being a By law to amend Comprehensive Zoning By law 87 250 as amended with respect to permitting Drive through Service facilities in the Town of Caledon Regional Municipality of Peel. 2012.
47.
City of Fredericton. A Zoning By-Law for the City of Fredericton: By-Law No. Z-5. 2013.
48.
L'Association pour la Sante Publique de Quebec. Limiting businesses with drive-through service: The experience of the Borough of Saint-Laurent in Montreal. 2014.
49.
Borough Saint-Laurent. Saint-Laurent, Québec: Règlement numéro RCA08–08–0001-17. 2014.
50.
The Town of the Blue Mountains. The Town of the Blue Mountains Official Community Plan. 2014.
51.
52.
L'Arrondissement Rosemont - Petite-Patrie. 01–279 Règlement d’urbanisme de l’arrondissement Rosemont–Petite-Patrie (Codification Administrative). 2015.
53.
City of Mississauga. Public Notice - City Initiated Zoning By-Law Affecting all Lands in the City of Mississauga 2015.
54.
City of Vancouver. Policy Report: Non-Industrial Conditional Uses in the I-2 and M-2 Industrial Zones - Proposed Policy and Zoning By-law Amendments 2006.
55.
City of Calgary. Land Use Bylaw 1P2007. 2007.
56.
Town of Ladysmith. A by-law to amend "Town of Ladysmith Zoning By-Law, 1995, no. 1160". 2009.
57.
Town of Comox. Town of Comox planning report: rezoning application no. RZ 09-2 drive-thrus (RCM October 21, 2009 3rd Reading and Adoption). 2009.
58.
District of Mission. Zoning By-law 5050–2009. 2009.
59.
The Corporation of the District of Central Saanich. The Corporation of the Land Use Bylaw #1309 2014.
60.
Town of Beaumont. Land Use Bylaw 796–12. 2012.
61.
Shipan CR, Volden C. The mechanisms of policy diffusion. Am J Pol Sci. 2008;52:840–57.CrossRef
62.
Nykiforuk CI, Eyles J, Campbell HS. Smoke-free spaces over time: a policy diffusion study of bylaw development in Alberta and Ontario. Can Health Soc Care Community. 2008;16:64–74.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Lorenzi NM, Novak LL, Weiss JB, Gadd CS, Unertl KM. Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:290–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Moore GA. Crossing the chasm. New York: HarperCollins Publishers; 2001.
65.
66.
67.
City of Waterloo. Official plan - office consolidation October 2014. 2014.
68.
Corporation of Delta. Community planning advisory committee. 2016.
69.
City of Ottawa. Urban Design guidelines for drive-through facilities. 2006.
70.
City of St. John's. St. John’s development regulations 1994. 2015.
Metadata
Title
Adoption and diffusion of zoning bylaws banning fast food drive-through services across Canadian municipalities
Authors
Candace I. J. Nykiforuk
Elizabeth J. Campbell
Soultana Macridis
Daniel McKennitt
Kayla Atkey
Kim D. Raine
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5061-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Gender difference in health related quality of life and associated factors among people living with HIV/AIDS attending anti-retroviral therapy at public health facilities, western Ethiopia: comparative cross sectional study

Research article

The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012

Research article

Preventing suicidal behaviours with a multilevel intervention: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

A school-based interdisciplinary approach to promote health and academic achievement among children in a deprived neighborhood: study protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation

Research article

Prevalence of breast-related symptoms, health care seeking behaviour and diagnostic needs among women in Burkina Faso

Research article

Clustering and correlates of screen-time and eating behaviours among young children