Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Evaluating the impact of a walking program in a disadvantaged area: using the RE-AIM framework by mixed methods

Authors: Camila Tiome Baba, Isabela Martins Oliveira, Adriele Evelyn Ferreira Silva, Leonardo Moreira Vieira, Natalia Caroline Cerri, Alex Antonio Florindo, Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Abstract

Background

The positive health impact of physical activity (PA) is well known, yet a large proportion of the world’s population remains sedentary. General PA programs are common as health promotion initiatives. However, effectiveness evaluations of such PA programs on individual and organizational aspects, which could inform the decision-making process of public health bodies are still lacking, particularly in the most socially disadvantaged areas, where health promotion schemes are particularly needed. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a Guided Walking Program in a high social vulnerability context.

Methods

A quasi-experimental, mixed methods study was conducted. The program had a duration of 6 months and a 6-month follow-up period after the intervention. Session frequency was five times a week, where sessions consisted of supervised PA combined with educational sessions. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was followed to assess the program. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and accelerometers were used to measure levels of PA. Focus groups were conducted to gain a comprehensive insight on the implementation domain.

Results

Most subjects in the intervention (IG) (n = 74) and control (CG) (n = 74) groups were female (IG:90.5%; CG:95.9%), aged 18–49 years (IG:44.6%; CG:43.2%), received less than 1 minimum wage (IG:74.3%; CG:83.7%) and had 0–4 years of formal education (IG:52.1%; CG:46.1%). The reach of the intervention was 0.3%. The IG showed increased levels of PA at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up. However, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. Adoption data revealed that 89.5% of the professionals in the Primary Health Care Center (health center) team perceived the benefits of the program for the population. The program was independently promoted by the health center team for a further 4 months post-intervention. The qualitative data revealed that the program was discontinued due to participants’ low adherence and human resource limitations in the unit’s operational dynamics.

Conclusions

A health promotion intervention in a socially deprived setting faces challenges but can be effective and feasible to implement. The present study informs the development of future health promotion initiatives in this context.

Trial registration

NCT02857127. Registered: 30 July 2016 (retrospectively registered).

WHO. Core Indicators: Health Situation in the Americas; 2016. p. 20.

World Health Organization - WHO. Media centre. Physical activity. Available in: <http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/. Accessed June 2017.

Lee M, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Pekka P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT: Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012, 380:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9

Turi BC, Codogno JS, Fernandes RA, Monteiro HL: Caminhada e gastos com saúde em adultos usuários do sistema público de saúde brasileiro: estudo transversal retrospectivo. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 2015, 11(20):8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152011.00092015.

Bielemann RM, Knuth AG, Hallal PC: Atividade física e redução de custos por doenças crônicas ao Sistema Único de Saúde. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde 2009, 15(1):6.

Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, van Mechelen W, Pratt M, Committee LPASE: The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2016, 388(10051):1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacioonal de Saúde Suplementar. Vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico - VIGITEL. Brasília. 2015:167.

Knuth AG, Bacchieri G, Victora CG, Hallal PC: Changes in physical activity among Brazilian adults over a 5-year period. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010, 64(7):591–595.

Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S, Group LPASW: The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet 2012, 380(9838):294–305.

10.

Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC, Committee LPASE: Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet 2016, 388(10051):1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0

11.

Hallal PC, Matsudo S, Farias JC: Measurement of physical activity by self-report in low- and middle-income countries: more of the same is not enough. J Phys Act Health 2012, 9 Suppl 1:S88–90.

12.

Silva ICM, Payne VLC, Hino AA, Varela AR, Reis RS, Ekelund U, Hallal PC. Physical Activity and safety from crime among adults: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health, 2016, 13: 663–670. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0156http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0156

13.

Sallis JF, Slymen DJ, Conway TL, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Cain K, Chapman JE. Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes. Health Place. 2011;17(6):1274–83.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ball K, Carver A, Downing K, Jackson M, O'Rourke K. Addressing the social determinants of inequities in physical activity and sedentary behaviours. Health Promot Int. 2015;30(Suppl 2):18–9.CrossRef

15.

Wierenga D, Engbers LH, Empelen PV, Duijts S, Hildebrandt VH, Mechelen WV. What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksit health promotion programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1190):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1190.

16.

Jauregui E, Pacheco AM, Soltero EG, O'Connor TM, Castro CM, Estabrooks PA, McNeill LH, Lee RE. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate physical activity public health programs in México. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(162):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1474-2.

17.

Galaviz KI, Harden SM, Smith E, Blackman KC, Berrey LM, Mama SK, Almeida FA, Lee RE, Estabrooks PA. Physical activity promotion in Latin American populations: a systematic review on issues of internal and external validity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Hoehner CM, Ribeiro IC, Parra DC, Reis RS, Azevedo MR, Hino AA, Soares J, Hallal PC, Simões EJ, Brownson RC. Physical activity interventions in Latin America: expanding and classifying the evidence. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(3):e31–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Olstad DL, Ball K, Abbott G, McNaughton SA, Le HN, Ni Mhurchu C, Pollard C, Crawford DA. A process evaluation of the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0352-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Zoellner JM, Hedrick VE, You W, Chen Y, Davy BM, Porter KJ, Bailey A, Lane H, Alexander R, Estabrooks PA. Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0362-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Caperchione CM, Duncan M, Kolt GS, Vandelanotte C, Rosenkranz RR, Maeder A, Noakes M, Karunanithi M, Mummery WK. Examining an Australian physical activity and nutrition intervention using RE-AIM. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(2):450–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav005.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Harden SM, Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Kinney KA, Johnson SB, Brito F, Blackman KC, Zoellner JM, Hill JL, Almeida FA, et al. Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0141-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Almeida FA, Brito FA, Estabrooks PA. Modelo RE-AIM: Tradução e Adaptação cultural para o Brasil. REFACS. 2013;1(1):10.CrossRef

25.

São Paulo: Índice Paulista de Vulnerabilidade Social. In. Edited by Paulo ALdEdS. São Paulo: Fundação SEADE; 2010: 20.

26.

Serafim THS, Nakamura PM, Pereira G, Nakamura FY, Kokubun E. Development of the color scale of perceived exertion: preliminary validation. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;118(3):884–900. https://doi.org/10.2466/27.06.PMS.119c28z5.CrossRef

27.

Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP, Medicine ACoS. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59.CrossRefPubMed

28.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Calendário da Saúde. Brasília, 2014. Avaliable in: <http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/index.php/cidadao/comunicacao/leia-mais-comunicacao/136-chamada-eventos>. Accessed 15 Jul 2014.

29.

Matsudo S, Araujo T, Matsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira LC, Braggion G. Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física (IPAQ): estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2001;6(2):5–12.

30.

Freedson OS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications. Ins accelerometer Med Sci Sports Exer. 1998;30(5):77781. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021

31.

Ziegler A, Vens M. Generalized estimating equations. Handook of Epidemiology Springer. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0499-6.

32.

Costa EF, Andrade DR, Garcia LMT, Ribeiro EHC, Santos TI, Florindo AA. Avaliação da efetividade da promoção da atividade física por agentes comunitários de saúde em visitas domiciliares. Cad Saúde Pública. 2015;31(10):2185–98. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00106014 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo, Edeições. 2011;70 229p

34.

Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Hucitec. 2010;12:407.

35.

Benedetti TRB, Schwingel A, Gomez LSR, Chodzko-Zajko W. Programa “VAMOS” (Vida Ativa Melhorando a Saúde): da concepção aos primeiros resultados. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2012;14(6):14. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2012v14n6p723.CrossRef

36.

Banos RM, Mensorio MS, Cebolla A, Rodilla E, Palomar G, Lisón JF, Botella C. An internet-based self-administered intervention for promoting healthy habits and weight loss in hypertensive people who are overweight or obese: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiaovascular Disorders. 2015;15:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0078-1.CrossRef

37.

Simões EJ, Hallal PC, Siqueira FV, Schmaltz C, Menor D, Malta DC, Duarte H, Hino AA, Mielke GI, Pratt M. Effectiveness of a scaled up physical activity intervention in Brazil: A natural experiment. Prev Med. 2016;7 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.032

38.

Ueno DT, Gobbi S, Teixeira CVL, Sebastião É, Prado AKG, Costa JLR, Gobbi LTB. Efeitos de três modalidades de atividade física na capacidade funcional de idosos. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2012;26(2):8.CrossRef

39.

Costa EF, Andrade DR, Garcia LM, Ribeiro EH, Santos TI, Florindo AA. Evaluation of the effectiveness of home-based physical activity promotion by community health workers. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(10):2185–98. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00106014.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Sandreschi PF, Petreça DR, Mazo GZ. Avaliação de um programa universitário de atividade física para idosos pelo modelo RE-AIM. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2015;20(3):11. http://dx.doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.20n3p270.CrossRef

41.

Squarcini CFR, Rocha SV, Munaro HLR, Benedetti TRB, Almeida FA. Physical activity programs for elderly persons: an evaluation of Brazilian scientific production using the RE-AIM framework. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2015;18(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-9823.2015.14103.CrossRef

42.

BRASIL: Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2015.

43.

Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, Chapman K, Twyman L, Bryant J, Brozek I, Hughes C. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Cambota JN, Rocha FF. Determinantes das desigualdades na utilização de serviços de saúde: análise para o Brasil e regiões. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico. 2015;45(2):26.

45.

Assis MMA, Jesus WLA. Acesso aos serviços de saúde: abordagens, conceitos, políticas e modelo de análise. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2012;11(17):10.

46.

BRASIL. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde. Portaria n° 687 MS/GM, de 30 de março de 2006. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006. p. 60.

47.

World Health Organization (WHO). World report on Ageing and Health; 2015. p. 260. Avaliable in: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf. Accessed June 2017.

48.

Salvador EP, Ribeiro EH, Andrade DR, Florindo AA. Descrição metodológica da seleção de participants em uma intervenção para a promoção da atividade física pela Estratégia de Saúde da Família. Rev Bras Ativ Fis e Saúde. 2012;17(4):6.

49.

Madeira MC, Siqueira FC, Facchini LA, Silveira DS, Tomasi E, Thumé E, Silva SM, Dilélio A, Piccini RX. Physical activity during commuting by adults and elderly in Brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29(1):165–74.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Blackford K, Jancey J, Lee AH, James A, Howat P, Waddell T. Effects of a home-based intervention on diet and physical activity behaviours for rural adults with or at risk of metabolic syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0337-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Luten KA, Reijneveld SA, Dijkstra A, de Winter AF. Reach and effectiveness of an integrated community-based intervention on physical activity and healthy eating of older adults in a socioeconomically disadvantaged community. Health Educ Res. 2016;31(1):98–106.PubMed

52.

Borges RA. Programas de promoção de atividade física no SUS: barreiras e facilitadores organizacionais. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2014.

53.

Ramos LR, Malta DC, Gomes GA, Bracco MM, Florindo AA, Mielke GI, Parra DC, Lobelo F, Simoes EJ, Hallal PC. Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2014;48(5):837–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Maissiat GS, Lautert L, Pai DD, Tavares JP. Contexto de trabalho, prazer e sofrimento na Atenção Básica em saúde. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2015;36(2):7.CrossRef

55.

Gomes GA, Kokubun E, Mieke GI, Ramos LR, Pratt M, Parra DC, Simões E, Florindo AA, Bracco M, Cruz D, et al. Characteristics of physical activity programs in the Brazilian primary health care system. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(10):2155–68.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Peres CRFB, Caldas Júnior AL, Silva RF, Marin MJS. O Agente Comunitário de Saúde frente ao processo de trabalho em equipe: facilidades e dificuldades. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011;45(4):6.CrossRef

57.

Ory MG, Altpeter M, Belza B, Helduser J, Zhang C, Smith ML. Perceptions about community applications of RE-AIM in the promotion of evidence-based programs for older adults. Eval Health Prof. 2015;38(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00143.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Evaluating the impact of a walking program in a disadvantaged area: using the RE-AIM framework by mixed methods
Authors: Camila Tiome Baba
Isabela Martins Oliveira
Adriele Evelyn Ferreira Silva
Leonardo Moreira Vieira
Natalia Caroline Cerri
Alex Antonio Florindo
Grace Angélica de Oliveira Gomes
Publication date: 01-12-2017
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4698-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Evaluating the impact of a walking program in a disadvantaged area: using the RE-AIM framework by mixed methods

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

High burden of hypertension across the age groups among residents of Gondar city in Ethiopia: a population based cross sectional study

Erratum to: Validation of verbal autopsy: determination of cause of deaths in Malaysia 2013

Alcohol screening and brief interventions for adults and young people in health and community-based settings: a qualitative systematic literature review

Promoting active travel to school: a systematic review (2010–2016)

A study on the influence of internet addiction and online interpersonal influences on health-related quality of life in young Vietnamese

Waist-to-height ratio is a useful index for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: a secondary data analysis