Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Mapping public health research across the National Institute for Health Research 2006–2013

Authors: Eleanor Woodford Guegan, Hannah Dorling, Liz Ollerhead, Matt Westmore

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Public health research is an important component of United Kingdom (UK) health research and strategic analysis of its breadth and balance is key to ensure value. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is one of the main funders of health research in the UK and includes many research programmes and schools. This study reports on public health research funded by the NIHR between April 2006 and March 2013.

Methods

The NIHR research programmes and schools were asked for information about all research funded during the study period. Firstly, projects were classified as a public health research project according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The public health research projects were further categorised according to the Public Health Outcomes Framework and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence taxonomy.

Results

Approximately 3000 research projects were funded by the NIHR, of which about 900 were relevant to public health. This represents approximately one-third of the research portfolio. All NIHR research funding programmes and schools funded research related to public health. The most prevalent domain of the Public Health Outcomes Framework was ‘healthcare public health and preventing premature mortality’ and there were a large number of health planning and self-management projects. One-quarter of projects were concerned with mental health and behavioural conditions.

Conclusions

The NIHR is a significant funder of research relevant to public health. This analysis offers a snapshot of the breadth and balance of NIHR research, which forms a basis for discussion. This is important for the NIHR and other research funders as it shows areas that are better represented and opportunities to fill important gaps. Appropriate research priority setting is an integral part of a needs-led research agenda and adds value to research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–65.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–65.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference UK Clinical Research Collaboration. UK Health Research Analysis 2009/10. London UK Clinical Research Collaboration 2012 UK Clinical Research Collaboration. UK Health Research Analysis 2009/10. London UK Clinical Research Collaboration 2012
3.
go back to reference Wellcome Trust. Portfolio Review; Population and Public Health 1990–2011. London: Wellcome Trust; 2013. Wellcome Trust. Portfolio Review; Population and Public Health 1990–2011. London: Wellcome Trust; 2013.
5.
go back to reference McCarthy M, Clarke A. European public health research literatures—measuring progress. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:2–5.CrossRefPubMed McCarthy M, Clarke A. European public health research literatures—measuring progress. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:2–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McCarthy M, Dyakova M, Clarke A. Public health research in the UK: a report with a European perspective. J Public Health. 2014;36(2):325–35.CrossRef McCarthy M, Dyakova M, Clarke A. Public health research in the UK: a report with a European perspective. J Public Health. 2014;36(2):325–35.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McCarthy M, Alexanderson K, Conceicao C, Barnhoorn F, Grimaud O, Katreniakova Z, et al. PHIRE - Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe: Summary Report. The Netherlands: European Public Health Association; 2013. McCarthy M, Alexanderson K, Conceicao C, Barnhoorn F, Grimaud O, Katreniakova Z, et al. PHIRE - Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe: Summary Report. The Netherlands: European Public Health Association; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Kallestal C, Swanberg I. Part 2: An inventory of Swedish public health research. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33 Suppl 65:17–45.CrossRef Kallestal C, Swanberg I. Part 2: An inventory of Swedish public health research. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33 Suppl 65:17–45.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gulis G, Eriksen ML, Aro AR. Public health research in Denmark in the years 1995–2005. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:104–7.CrossRefPubMed Gulis G, Eriksen ML, Aro AR. Public health research in Denmark in the years 1995–2005. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:104–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health. London: Crown copyright; 2006. Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health. London: Crown copyright; 2006.
13.
go back to reference Department of Health. The Public Health Outcomes Framework for England, 2013–2016. London: Crown copyright; 2012. Department of Health. The Public Health Outcomes Framework for England, 2013–2016. London: Crown copyright; 2012.
19.
go back to reference Carletta J. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational linguistics. 1996;22(2):249–54. Carletta J. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational linguistics. 1996;22(2):249–54.
20.
go back to reference Calitz C, Pollack K, Millard C, Yach D. National Institutes of Health Funding for behavioral interventions to prevent chronic diseases. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(4):462–71.CrossRefPubMed Calitz C, Pollack K, Millard C, Yach D. National Institutes of Health Funding for behavioral interventions to prevent chronic diseases. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(4):462–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Milne R, Law C. The NIHR public health research programme: developing evidence for public health decision-makers. J Public Health. 2009;31(4):589–92.CrossRef Milne R, Law C. The NIHR public health research programme: developing evidence for public health decision-makers. J Public Health. 2009;31(4):589–92.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M. Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(4):284–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M. Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(4):284–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference HM Government, Department of Health. No health without mental health: A cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: Crown copyright; 2011. HM Government, Department of Health. No health without mental health: A cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: Crown copyright; 2011.
24.
25.
go back to reference Hunter D, Brown J. A review of health management research. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:33–7.CrossRefPubMed Hunter D, Brown J. A review of health management research. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:33–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Mapping public health research across the National Institute for Health Research 2006–2013
Authors
Eleanor Woodford Guegan
Hannah Dorling
Liz Ollerhead
Matt Westmore
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3521-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue