Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Exploring participant appreciation of group-based principles for action in community-based physical activity programs for socially vulnerable groups in the Netherlands

Authors: Marion Herens, Annemarie Wagemakers, Lenneke Vaandrager, Maria Koelen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physical inactivity is a core risk factor for non-communicable diseases. In the Netherlands, socially vulnerable groups are relatively less active than groups with higher socio-economic status. Community-based health-enhancing physical activity (CBHEPA) programs aim to empower socially vulnerable groups by improving participants’ health and wellbeing through physical activity. CBHEPA programs often revolve around group-based principles for action, such as active participation, enjoyment, and fostering group processes. As such principles are rarely made explicit, our study aims to identify which of the group-based principles for action are considered important by participants.

Methods

Respondents (n = 76) from ten focus groups scored their individual appreciation of group-based principles for action – active participation, enjoyment, and fostering group processes – on a three-point, statement-based scale. Opinions were further discussed in the focus group. Focus group discussions were transcribed and analysed by a team of investigators. The coding procedures, identifying elements appreciated in group-based principles for action, were thematic and data driven.

Results

Statements about participatory programming generated much less consensus in appreciation among respondents than statements about enjoyment and fostering group processes. To some extent, group members participated in the development of program content. Participation in group formation or community initiatives was less frequently perceived as something within group members’ control. Enjoyment, expressed as physical and emotional experiences, was found to be an individual driver of group exercise. Fostering group processes, expressed as social support, was found to contribute to enjoyment and learning achievements. Responsive leadership, ensuring responsive guidance, by an enthusiastic exercise trainer acting as a role model, were identified as additional necessary principles for action.

Conclusions

Group-based principles for action in CBHEPA programs are not clearly demarcated. Fostering group processes is an overarching principle, conditional for the spin-off in terms of enjoyment and active participation. This, in turn, leads to a sense of ownership among participants, who take up responsibility for the exercise group as well as their individual activity behaviour. CBHEPA programs thrive on participants having fun together and exercise trainers’ leadership skills. A professional, competent, responsive exercise trainer plays a key role in the organisation and maintenance of CBHEPA programs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380:219–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Wendel-Vos G, Dutman AE, Verschuren W, Ronckers ET, Ament A, van Assema P, et al. Lifestyle factors of a five-year community-intervention program: the Hartslag Limburg intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:50–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Hildebrandt V, Bernaards C, Stubbe J. Trend report physical activity and health 2010/2011. Leiden: TNO Innovation for Life; 2013.
5.
Kemper HGC, Ooijendijk WTM, Stiggelbout M. Consensus over de Nederlandse norm voor gezond bewegen (NNGB) [Consensus on the Dutch Healthy Physical Activity Guidelines]. TSG. 2000;78:180–3.
6.
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. Landelijke nota gezondheidsbeleid: Gezondheid dichtbij [Policy note: Health close to People]. The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports; 2011.
7.
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. Samen voor Sport; uitvoeringsprogramma 2006–2010 van de kabinetsnota Tijd voor sport [Together for Sport, implementation program 2006–2010 of the national policy Time for sportsTogether]. The Hague: Ministry of Health, Wellfare and Sports; 2006.
8.
Chatzisarantis NL, Hagger MS. Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychol Health. 2009;24:29–48.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hagger M, Chatzisarantis N. Self-determination theory and the psychology of exercise. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;1:79–103.CrossRef
10.
Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2005;35:565–76.CrossRef
11.
Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psy. 2008;57:1–29.
12.
Van Stralen MM, De Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. Determinants of initiation and maintenance of physical activity among older adults: a literature review. Health Psychol Rev. 2009;3:147–207.CrossRef
13.
Toropainen E, Rinne M. What are groups all about—Basic principles of group work for health-related physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33 Suppl 1:S105–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: how are we doing? how might we do better? Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:266–97.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Adamsen L, Rasmussen JM, Pedersen LS. ‘Brothers in arms’: how men with cancer experience a sense of comradeship through group intervention which combines physical activity with information relay. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:528–37.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Estabrooks PA, Harden SM, Burke SM. Group dynamics in physical activity promotion: what works? Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2012;6:18–40.CrossRef
17.
Fox LD, Rejeski WJ, Gauvin L. Effects of leadership style and group dynamics on enjoyment of physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2000;14:277–83.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Harden SM, Burke SM, Haile AM, Estabrooks PA. Generalizing the findings from group dynamics–based physical activity research to practice settings: what do we know? Eval Health Prof. 2015;38:3–14.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Spink KS, Wilson KS, Priebe CS. Groupness and adherence in structured exercise settings. Group Dyn Theor Res. 2010;14:163.CrossRef
20.
Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Theory, research, and practice in health behavior and education. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
21.
Herens M, Wagemakers A, Vaandrager L, Van Ophem J, Koelen M. Evaluation design for community-based physical activity programs for socially disadvantaged groups – the case of Communities on the Move. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2:e20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Burke SM, Carron AV, Eys MA, Ntoumanis N, Estabrooks PA. Group versus individual approach? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity. Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2006;2:19–35.
23.
Storm I, Post NAM. Meedoen door toegankelijke omgeving [Participation through accessible environments]. Bilthoven: RIVM [National Institute for Public Health and the Environment]; 2012. p. 60.
24.
World Health Organization. The Ottawa Charter for health promotion. Copenhagen: WHO; 1986.
25.
Gregg J, O'Hara L. Values and principles evident in current health promotion practice. Health Promot J Aust. 2007;18:7–11.
26.
27.
Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2006;27:297–322.CrossRef
28.
Van Leeuwen JA, Waltner-oews D, Abernathy T, Smit B. Evolving models of human health toward an ecosystem context. Ecosyst Health. 1999;5:204–19.CrossRef
29.
Laverack G. Improving health outcomes through community empowerment: a review of the literature. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:113–20.PubMed
30.
Hyyppä MT, Mäki J. Social participation and health in a community rich in stock of social capital. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:770–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lindström M, Hanson BS, Östergren PO. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:441–51.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Van der Deijl M, Etman A, Kamphuis C, Van Lenthe F. Participation levels of physical activity programs for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1301.
33.
Rootman I, O’Neill M. Key concepts in health promotion. In: Rootman I, Dupéré S, O'Neill M, Pederson A, editors. Health promotion in Canada: critical perspectives on practice. 3rd ed. Toronto: Canadians Scolars' Press Inc; 2012. p. 18–32.
34.
Antonovsky A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1996;11:11–8.CrossRef
35.
Fuller BG, Stewart Williams JA, Byles JE. Active living—the perception of older people with chronic conditions. Chronic Illness. 2010;6:294–305.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Morgan A, Ziglio E. Revitalising the evidence base for public health: an assets model. Promot Educ. 2007;Suppl 2:17–22.PubMed
37.
Ife JW, Tesoriero F. Community development: community-based alternatives in an age of globalisation. Melbourne: Pearson Australia; 2006.
38.
Kok MO, Vaandrager L, Bal R, Schuit J. Practitioner opinions on health promotion interventions that work: opening the 'black box' of a linear evidence-based approach. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:715–23.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380:247–57.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Schunk DH. Social-self interaction and achievement behavior. Educ Psychol. 1999;34:219–27.CrossRef
41.
Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13:623–49.CrossRef
42.
43.
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15:175–83.CrossRef
44.
Putnam R. Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Can J Pol Res. 2001;2:41–51.
45.
Wagemakers A, Corstjens R, Koelen M, Vaandrager L, Van 't Riet H, Dijkshoorn H. Participatory approaches to promote healthy lifestyles among Turkish and Moroccan women in Amsterdam. Promot Educ. 2008;15:17–23.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Jallinoja P, Pajari P, Absetz P. Negotiated pleasures in health-seeking lifestyles of participants of a health promoting intervention. Health. 2010;14:115–30.PubMed
47.
Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Seydel ER, Van de Laar MA. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e18.
48.
Casey D, De Civita M, Dasgupta K. Understanding physical activity facilitators and barriers during and following a supervised exercise programme in Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabet Med. 2010;27:79–84.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Jepson R, Harris FM, Bowes A, Robertson R, Avan G, Sheikh A. Physical activity in South Asians: an in-depth qualitative study to explore motivations and facilitators. PloS One. 2012;7:e45333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Hiemstra A. Manual: Meedoen en meebewegen, hoe doe je dat? [How to join in and particpate in community-based physcial activity programs?]. Nieuwegein: Netherlands Institute for Sport and Physical Activity (NISB); 2005.
51.
Beijers CA, Wagemakers AWS, Herens MC. Verspreiding van de interventie Communities in Beweging onder allochtone vrouwen [Dissemination of Communities on the Move in women from ethnic or cultural minorities]. MsC thesis. Wageningen University,Department of Social Sciences, Health and Society; 2009.
52.
Vernon S, Ross F. Participation in community exercise classes: barriers to access. Brit J Commun Nurs. 2008;13:89–92.CrossRef
53.
White JL, Randsdell LB, Vener J, Flohr JA. Factors related to physical activity adherence in women: Review and suggestions for future research. Womens Health. 2005;41:123–48.CrossRef
54.
Wagemakers A, Vaandrager L, Koelen MA, Saan H, Leeuwis C. Community health promotion: a framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health. Eval Program Plann. 2010;33:428–35.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Hosper K, Nierkens V, van Valkengoed I, Stronks K. Motivational factors mediating the association between acculturation and participation in sport among young Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands. Prev Med. 2008;47:95–100.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Butterfoss FD. Process evaluation for community participation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:323–40.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Rifkin SB, Muller F, Bichmann W. Primary health care: on measuring participation. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:931–40.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Kuroda Y, Sato Y, Ishizaka Y, Yamakado M, Yamaguchi N. Exercise motivation, self-efficacy, and enjoyment as indicators of adult exercise behavior among the transtheoretical model stages. Glob Health Promot. 2012;19:14–22.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Mullen SP, Olson EA, Phillips SM, Szabo AN, Wójcicki TR, Mailey EL, et al. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Raedeke TD. The relationship between enjoyment and affective responses to exercise. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2007;19:105–15.CrossRef
61.
Henderson KA. A paradox of sport management and physical activity interventions. Sport Manage Rev. 2009;12:57–65.CrossRef
62.
Lloyd KM, Little DE. Keeping women active: an examination of the impacts of self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and leadership on women's persistence in physical activity. Womens Health. 2010;50:652–69.CrossRef
63.
Christensen U, Schmidt L, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Avlund K. Group cohesion and social support in exercise classes: results from a Danish intervention study. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33:677–89.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Estabrooks PA, Munroe KJ, Fox EH, Gyurcsik NC, Hill JL, Lyon R, et al. Leadership in physical activity groups for older adults: a qualitative analysis. J Aging Phys Act. 2004;12:232–45.CrossRefPubMed
65.
CCMO. Behavioural research and the WMO. In: Manual for the review of medical research involving human subjects. The Hague: CCMO [Central Committee on Human Related Research]; 2002. p. 66–9.
66.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualit Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
67.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2007.
68.
Chemers MM. Leadership research and theory: a functional integration. Group Dyn Theor Res. 2000;4:27–43.CrossRef
69.
Lewin K. Force field analysis. In: The 1973 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators. Seattle: University Associates; 1946. p. 111–3.
70.
Burnes B, Cooke B. Kurt Lewin's Field theory: a review and re-evaluation. Int J Manag Rev. 2013;15:408–25.
71.
Springer JB, Lamborn SD, Pollard DM. Maintaining physical activity over time: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction in developing the physically active self. Health Promot. 2013;27:284–93.CrossRef
72.
Havitz ME, Kaczynski AT, Mannell RC. Exploring relationships between physical activity, leisure involvement, self-efficacy, and motivation via participant segmentation. Leisure Sci. 2012;35:45–62.CrossRef
73.
Han JS, Patterson I. An analysis of the influence that leisure experiences have on a person's mood state, health and wellbeing. Ann Leisure Res. 2007;10:328–51.CrossRef
74.
Williams DM, Papandonatos GD, Napolitano MA, Lewis BA, Whiteley JA, Marcus BH. Perceived enjoyment moderates the efficacy of an individually tailored physical activity intervention. J Sport Exercise Psychol. 2006;28:300.CrossRef
75.
Crawford R. Health as a meaningful social practice. Health. 2006;10:401–20.PubMed
76.
Hagberg LA, Lindahl B, Nyberg L, Hellénius ML. Importance of enjoyment when promoting physical exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19:740–7.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Petruzzello SJ. Doing what feels good (and avoiding what feels bad)—a growing recognition of the influence of affect on exercise behavior: a comment on Williams et al. Ann Behav Med. 2012;44:7–9.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Ryan RM, Patrick H, Deci EL, Williams GC. Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. Eur Health Psy. 2008;10:2–5.
79.
Rinne M, Toropainen E. How to lead a group—practical principles and experiences of conducting a promotional group in health-related physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33:S69–76.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Koelen M, Lindström B. Making healthy choices easy choices: the role of empowerment. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:S10–6.CrossRefPubMed
81.
Gay G. Pedagogical potential of cultural responsiveness. In: Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press; 2010. p. 22–42.
82.
Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, Lutes L. A group‐mediated cognitive‐behavioral intervention for increasing adherence to physical activity in older adults. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2000;5:47–65.CrossRef
83.
Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380:258–71.CrossRefPubMed
84.
85.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Ccommun Psychol. 2009;43:267–76.CrossRef
86.
South J, Phillips G. Evaluating community engagement as part of the public health system. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68:692–6.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Wadsworth Y. Becoming responsive—and some consequences for evaluation as dialogue across distance. New Dir Eval. 2001;92:45–58.CrossRef
88.
Estabrooks PA, Carron AV. The Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire: an instrument for the assessment of cohesion in exercise classes. Group Dyn Theor Res. 2000;4:230.CrossRef
89.
Carron AV, Spink KS. Team building in an exercise setting. Sport Psychol. 1993;7:8–18.CrossRef
90.
Kreuter MW, McClure SM. The role of culture in health communication. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:439–55.CrossRefPubMed
91.
Conn VS, Chan K, Banks J, Ruppar TM, Scharff J. Cultural relevance of physical activity intervention research with underrepresented populations. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2014;34:391–414.CrossRef
92.
Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, Chapman K, Twyman L, Bryant J, et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:42–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
93.
Nusselder A. Health literacy en laaggeletterdheid [Health literacy and illiteracy]. Tijdschr Praktijkonderst. 2012;7:66–70.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring participant appreciation of group-based principles for action in community-based physical activity programs for socially vulnerable groups in the Netherlands
Authors
Marion Herens
Annemarie Wagemakers
Lenneke Vaandrager
Maria Koelen
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2515-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Importance of proximity to resources, social support, transportation and neighborhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: results from a scoping study

Research article

Health care access dimensions and cervical cancer screening in South Africa: analysis of the world health survey

Research article

Availability and acceptability of HIV counselling and testing services. A qualitative study comparing clients’ experiences of accessing HIV testing at public sector primary health care facilities or non-governmental mobile services in Cape Town, South Africa

Research article

Investigating the effect of a 3-month workplace-based pedometer-driven walking programme on health-related quality of life in meat processing workers: a feasibility study within a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Absence of asymptomatic malaria in a cohort of 133 individuals in a malaria endemic area of Assam, India

Research article

Challenges and opportunities associated with neglected tropical disease and water, sanitation and hygiene intersectoral integration programs