Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects

Authors: Justin Jagosh, Paula L. Bush, Jon Salsberg, Ann C. Macaulay, Trish Greenhalgh, Geoff Wong, Margaret Cargo, Lawrence W. Green, Carol P. Herbert, Pierre Pluye

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is an approach in which researchers and community stakeholders form equitable partnerships to tackle issues related to community health improvement and knowledge production. Our 2012 realist review of CBPR outcomes reported long-term effects that were touched upon but not fully explained in the retained literature. To further explore such effects, interviews were conducted with academic and community partners of partnerships retained in the review. Realist methodology was used to increase the understanding of what supports partnership synergy in successful long-term CBPR partnerships, and to further document how equitable partnerships can result in numerous benefits including the sustainability of relationships, research and solutions.

Methods

Building on our previous realist review of CBPR, we contacted the authors of longitudinal studies of academic-community partnerships retained in the review. Twenty-four participants (community members and researchers) from 11 partnerships were interviewed. Realist logic of analysis was used, involving middle-range theory, context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMOcs) and the concept of the ‘ripple effect’.

Results

The analysis supports the central importance of developing and strengthening partnership synergy through trust. The ripple effect concept in conjunction with CMOcs showed that a sense of trust amongst CBPR members was a prominent mechanism leading to partnership sustainability. This in turn resulted in population-level outcomes including: (a) sustaining collaborative efforts toward health improvement; (b) generating spin-off projects; and (c) achieving systemic transformations.

Conclusion

These results add to other studies on improving the science of CBPR in partnerships with a high level of power-sharing and co-governance. Our results suggest sustaining CBPR and achieving unanticipated benefits likely depend on trust-related mechanisms and a continuing commitment to power-sharing. These findings have implications for building successful CBPR partnerships to address challenging public health problems and the complex assessment of outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Cargo M, Mercer SL. The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its Practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29(1):325–50.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Macaulay AC et al. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. Br Med J. 1999;319(7212):774–8.CrossRef
3.
Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
4.
Wallerstein N, Duran B. The Theoretical, Historical, and Practice Roots of CBPR. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 25–39.
5.
Ismail S. Participatory Health Research in International Observatory on Health Research Systems. Cambridge: RAND Report: UK Department of Health; 2009.
6.
Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Introduction to Community-Based Participatory Research. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-Based Paticipatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. San Fransisco: Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 1–23.
7.
Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-Based Participatory Research Contribution to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S40–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Hicks S et al. Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6(3):289–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Oetzel J, Zhou C, Duran B, Pearson C, Magarati M, Lucero J, et al. Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community-based participatory research conceptual model. Am J Health Promot 2015 29(5):e188-202.
10.
Marent B, Forster R, Nowak P. Theorizing participation in health promotion: A literature review. Soc Theory Health. 2012;10(2):188–207.CrossRef
11.
Mercer SL, Green LW, Cargo M, Potter MA, Daniel M, Scott Olds R, et al. Appendix C: Reliabilitytested guidelines for assessing PR projects. In: Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: from practice to outcomes, 2nd edition. edn. Edited by Minkler M, Wallerstein N. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
12.
Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Duran B, Tafoya G, Belone L, Rae R. What predicts outcomes in CBPR? In: Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. 2nd edn. Edited by Minkler M, Wallerstein N. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:371-92.
13.
14.
Cacari-Stone L et al. The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence with Policy. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1615–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Berkowitz B. Studying the Outcomes of Community-Based Coalitions. Am J Community Psychol. 2001;29(2):213–27.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Khodyakov D et al. An Exploration of the Effect of Community Engagement in Research on Perceived Outcomes of Partnered Mental Health Services Projects(). Society and mental health. 2011;1(3):185–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Sandoval JA et al. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(4):680–90.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Khodyakov D et al. On Measuring Community Participation in Research. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):346–54.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Macaulay A et al. Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review. Glob Health Promot. 2011;18(2):45–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Jagosh J, Pluye P, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Henderson J, Sirett E, et al. Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implementation Science. 2011;6(1):24.
21.
Jagosh J et al. Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):311–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Macaulay A et al. Quantitative Methods in Participatory Research: Being sensitive to issues of scientific validity, community safety, and the academic-community relationship. Nouvelles pratiques sociales. 2014;25(2):159–72.CrossRef
23.
Jagosh J et al. Critical Reflections on Realist Review: insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment. Res Synth Methods. 2013;5(2):131–14.
24.
Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
25.
Pawson R. Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE publications; 2006.CrossRef
26.
Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
27.
Pawson R et al. Realist review: a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:21–34.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation: A realist manifesto. London: Sage Publications; 2013.CrossRef
29.
Merton RK. Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1968.
30.
Lasker R, Weiss E, Miller R. Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative Advantage. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Trickett E. The Ecology of Multilevel Interventions to Reduce Social Inequalities in Health. Am Behav Sci. 2013;57(8):1227–46.CrossRef
32.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3-4):267–76.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Cargo M et al. Community governance of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project, Kahnawake Territory, Mohawk Nation, Canada. Health Promot Int. 2003;18(3):177–87.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Jones L & Wells K. Strategies for Academic and Clinician Engagement in Community-Participatory Partnered Research. Journal of the American Medical Association 2007, 297(4):407-410.
35.
Chung B, Corbett C, Boulet B, Cummings J, Paxton K, McDaniel S, et al. Talking Wellness: a description of a community-academic partnered project to engage an African-American community around depression through the use of poetry, film, and photography. Ethn Dis 2006;16(1Suppl 1):S67-78.
36.
37.
38.
39.
Greener I. Patient choice in the NHS: the view from economic sociology. Social Theory and Health. 2003;1:72–89.CrossRef
40.
Robb N, Greenhalgh T. ‘You have to cover up the words of the doctor’. The mediation of trust in interpreted consultations in primary care. Social Science in Medicine. 2005;20:434–55.
41.
Moynihan D. Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding: Community action in the war on poverty. New York: Free Press; 1969.
42.
Trickett E et al. Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):9.
Metadata
Title
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects
Authors
Justin Jagosh
Paula L. Bush
Jon Salsberg
Ann C. Macaulay
Trish Greenhalgh
Geoff Wong
Margaret Cargo
Lawrence W. Green
Carol P. Herbert
Pierre Pluye
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

LucKi Birth Cohort Study: rationale and design

Research article

Factors influencing the uptake of Voluntary HIV Counseling and Testing among secondary school students in Arusha City, Tanzania: a cross sectional study

Research article

Fogging the issue of HIV - Barriers for HIV testing in a migrated population from Ethiopia and Eritrea

Research article

Reorienting risk to resilience: street-involved youth perspectives on preventing the transition to injection drug use

Research article

An application in identifying high-risk populations in alternative tobacco product use utilizing logistic regression and CART: a heuristic comparison

Research article

Treatment outcomes and their determinants in HIV patients on Anti-retroviral Treatment Program in selected health facilities of Kembata and Hadiya zones, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region, Ethiopia