Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2022

01-12-2022 | Refractive Errors | Research

Myopia in Bulgarian school children: prevalence, risk factors, and health care coverage

Authors: Mila Dragomirova, Albena Antonova, Slavena Stoykova, Gergana Mihova, Denitsa Grigorova

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of myopia has increased in recent years, with changes being dynamic and uneven in different regions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of visual impairment caused by myopia in Bulgarian school children, associated risk factors, and health care coverage.

Methods

A cross-sectional study among 1401 children (mean age 10.38, standard deviation 2.70) is conducted in three locations in Bulgaria from 2016 to 2020. Refractive error is measured with an auto-refractor in the absence of cycloplegia, the visual acuity is assessed without refractive error correction. A paper-based preliminary questionnaire is used to collect data on previous eye examinations, prescribed optical vision correction, regularity of wearing corrective glasses and risk factors.

Results

Children with myopic objective refraction ≤ -0.75 D and decimal visual acuity ≤ 0.8 on at least one of the eyes are 236 out of 1401 or 16.85%. The prevalence of myopia varies depending on age, geographical location, and school profile. The rate of myopic children in age group 6–10 is 14.2% compared to 19.9% in age group 11–15. The prevalence of myopic children in the urban populations is 31.4% (capital) and 19.9% (medium-sized town) respectively, and only 8.4% in the rural population. Our results show 53% increase of the prevalence of myopia in the age group 11–15 compared to a 2009 report. The analysis of data associated with health care coverage factors of all myopic pupils shows that 71.6% had a previous eye examination, 43.2% have prescription for corrective glasses, 27.5% wear their glasses regularly. Risk factors for higher odds of myopia are gender (female), age (adolescence), and parents with impaired vision. Residence in a small town and daily sport activities correspond to lower odds for myopia. The screen time (time in front of the screen calculated in hours per day) is self-reported and is not associated with increased odds of myopia when accounted for the other risk factors.

Conclusions

The prevalence of myopia in this study is higher compared to previous studies in Bulgaria. Additional studies would be helpful in planning adequate prevention and vision care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–42.CrossRef Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–42.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Wathern AK, et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis: implications for aetiology and early prevention. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:882–90.CrossRef Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Wathern AK, et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis: implications for aetiology and early prevention. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:882–90.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ikuno Y. Overview of the complications of high myopia. Retina. 2017;37(12):2347–51.CrossRef Ikuno Y. Overview of the complications of high myopia. Retina. 2017;37(12):2347–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Naidoo KS, Fricke TR, Frick KD, et al. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of myopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modeling. Ophthalmology. 2018;126:338–46.CrossRef Naidoo KS, Fricke TR, Frick KD, et al. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of myopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modeling. Ophthalmology. 2018;126:338–46.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Rese. 2018;62:134–49 ISSN 1350-9462.CrossRef Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Rese. 2018;62:134–49 ISSN 1350-9462.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, et al. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:27.CrossRef Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, et al. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:27.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Li Y, Liu J, Qi P. The increasing prevalence of myopia in junior high school students in the Haidian District of Beijing, China: a 10-year population-based survey. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:88.CrossRef Li Y, Liu J, Qi P. The increasing prevalence of myopia in junior high school students in the Haidian District of Beijing, China: a 10-year population-based survey. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:88.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1279–85.CrossRef Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1279–85.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sánchez-Tocino H, Gómez VA, Bolaños CG, et al. The effect of light and outdoor activity in natural lighting on the progression of myopia in children. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019;42(1):2–10 ISSN 0181-5512.CrossRef Sánchez-Tocino H, Gómez VA, Bolaños CG, et al. The effect of light and outdoor activity in natural lighting on the progression of myopia in children. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019;42(1):2–10 ISSN 0181-5512.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jones LA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, et al. Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3524–32.CrossRef Jones LA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, et al. Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3524–32.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Morgan IG, Wu PC, Ostrin LA, Tideman JWL, Yam JC, Weizhong L, Rigmor CB, Xiangui H, et al. IMI risk factors for myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):3.CrossRef Morgan IG, Wu PC, Ostrin LA, Tideman JWL, Yam JC, Weizhong L, Rigmor CB, Xiangui H, et al. IMI risk factors for myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):3.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Polling JR, et al. Interaction between lifestyle and genetic susceptibility in myopia: the Generation R study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34:777–84.CrossRef Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Polling JR, et al. Interaction between lifestyle and genetic susceptibility in myopia: the Generation R study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34:777–84.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fotouhi A, Morgan IG, Iribarren R, et al. Validity of noncycloplegic refraction in the assessment of refractive errors: the Tehran Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(4):380–6.CrossRef Fotouhi A, Morgan IG, Iribarren R, et al. Validity of noncycloplegic refraction in the assessment of refractive errors: the Tehran Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(4):380–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sanfilippo PG, Chu BS, Bigault O, et al. What is the appropriate age cut-off for cycloplegia in refraction? Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:458–62.CrossRef Sanfilippo PG, Chu BS, Bigault O, et al. What is the appropriate age cut-off for cycloplegia in refraction? Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:458–62.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sankaridurg P, He X, Naduvilath T, et al. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:633–40.CrossRef Sankaridurg P, He X, Naduvilath T, et al. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:633–40.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Paudel N, Adhikari S, Thakur A, et al. Clinical accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(6):407–13.CrossRef Paudel N, Adhikari S, Thakur A, et al. Clinical accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(6):407–13.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Czepita D, Żejmo M, Mojsa A. Prevalence of myopia and hyperopia in a population of polish schoolchildren. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(1):60–5.CrossRef Czepita D, Żejmo M, Mojsa A. Prevalence of myopia and hyperopia in a population of polish schoolchildren. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(1):60–5.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Logan NS, Shah P, Rudnicka AR, et al. Childhood ethnic differences in ametropia and ocular biometry: the Aston Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):550–8.CrossRef Logan NS, Shah P, Rudnicka AR, et al. Childhood ethnic differences in ametropia and ocular biometry: the Aston Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):550–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harrington SC, Stack J, Saunders K, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in Ireland schoolchildren. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:1112–8.CrossRef Harrington SC, Stack J, Saunders K, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in Ireland schoolchildren. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:1112–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Robaei D, Kifley A, Rose K, et al. Refractive error and patterns of spectacle use in 12-year-old Australian children. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1567–73.CrossRef Robaei D, Kifley A, Rose K, et al. Refractive error and patterns of spectacle use in 12-year-old Australian children. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1567–73.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Plainis S, Moschandreas J, Nikolitsa P, et al. Myopia and visual acuity impairment: a comparative study of Greek and Bulgarian school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(3):312–20.CrossRef Plainis S, Moschandreas J, Nikolitsa P, et al. Myopia and visual acuity impairment: a comparative study of Greek and Bulgarian school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(3):312–20.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Slaveykov K, Trifonova K. Refraction in preschool children in Kazanlak Bulgaria. Folia Med. 2020;62(2):345–51.CrossRef Slaveykov K, Trifonova K. Refraction in preschool children in Kazanlak Bulgaria. Folia Med. 2020;62(2):345–51.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference McCrann S, Loughman J, Butler JS, Flitcroft I. Smartphone use as a possible risk factor for myopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;104(1):35–41.CrossRef McCrann S, Loughman J, Butler JS, Flitcroft I. Smartphone use as a possible risk factor for myopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;104(1):35–41.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Myopia in Bulgarian school children: prevalence, risk factors, and health care coverage
Authors
Mila Dragomirova
Albena Antonova
Slavena Stoykova
Gergana Mihova
Denitsa Grigorova
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02471-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2022 Go to the issue