Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

What surgeons tell patients and what patients want to know before major cancer surgery: a qualitative study

Authors: Angus G. K. McNair, F MacKichan, J. L. Donovan, S. T. Brookes, K. N. L. Avery, S. M. Griffin, T. Crosby, J. M. Blazeby

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2016

Abstract

Background

The information surgeons impart to patients and information patients want about surgery for cancer is important but rarely examined. This study explored information provided by surgeons and patient preferences for information in consultations in which surgery for oesophageal cancer surgery was discussed.

Methods

Pre-operation consultations in which oesophagectomy was discussed were studied in three United Kingdom hospitals and patients were subsequently interviewed. Consultations and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed in full and anonymized. Interviews elicited views about the information provided by surgeons and patients’ preferences for information. Thematic analysis of consultation-interview pairs was used to investigate similarities and differences in the information provided by surgeons and desired by patients.

Results

Fifty two audio-recordings from 31 patients and 7 surgeons were obtained (25 consultations and 27 patient interviews). Six consultations were not recorded because of equipment failure and four patients declined an interview. Surgeons all provided consistent, extensive information on technical operative details and in-hospital surgical risks. Consultations rarely included discussion of the longer-term outcomes of surgery. Whilst patients accepted that information about surgery and risks was necessary, they really wanted details about long-term issues including recovery, impact on quality of life and survival.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a need for surgeons to provide information of importance to patients concerning the longer term outcomes of surgery. It is proposed that “core information sets” are developed, based on surgeons’ and patients’ views, to use as a minimum in consultations to initiate discussion and meet information needs prior to cancer surgery.

Chaitchik S, Kreitler S, Shaked S, Schwartz I, Rosin R. Doctor-patient communication in a cancer ward. J Cancer Educ. 1992;7(1):41–54. doi:10.1080/08858199209528141.CrossRefPubMed

Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35(11):1592–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00212-9.CrossRefPubMed

Moore PJ, Adler NE, Robertson PA. Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions. Western J Med. 2000;173(4):244–50.CrossRef

Ong LM, Visser MR, Lammes FB, de Haes JC. Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients’ quality of life and satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;41(2):145–56. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00108-1.CrossRefPubMed

Street Jr RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015.CrossRefPubMed

Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):250–61. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.006.CrossRefPubMed

Lagarde SM, Franssen SJ, van Werven JR, Smets EM, Tran TC, Tilanus HW, et al. Patient preferences for the disclosure of prognosis after esophagectomy for cancer with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3289–98. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0068-y.CrossRefPubMed

General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008.

The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Good Surgical Practice. 2008.

10.

American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Fundamental Elements of the Patient-Physician Relationship. 1990.

11.

Tattersall MH, Butow PN, Griffin AM, Dunn SM. The take-home message: patients prefer consultation audiotapes to summary letters. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(6):1305–11.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, Kissane DW, Schrag D. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5275–80. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C, Jones A, Mossman J, Boudini M, et al. Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. BMJ. 2000;320:909–13. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7239.909.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(1):48–51. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Derogar M, Lagergren P. Health-related quality of life among 5-year survivors of esophageal cancer surgery: a prospective population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(4):413–8. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9791.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Blazeby JM. Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1132. doi:10.1002/bjs.7585.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ritchie J. Qualitative Research Practice A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2006.

18.

Edwards JA, Lampert MD. Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.

19.

QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 8 ed2008.

20.

Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.

21.

Blazeby JM, Alderson D, Farndon JR. Quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2000;155:193–204.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Andreassen S, Randers I, Naslund E, Stockeld D, Mattiasson AC. Information needs following a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer; self-perceived information needs of patients and family members compared with the perceptions of healthcare professionals: a pilot study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00742.x.

23.

Franssen SJ, Lagarde SM, van Werven JR, Smets EM, Tran KT, Plukker JT, et al. Psychological factors and preferences for communicating prognosis in esophageal cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2009;18(11):1199–207. doi:10.1002/pon.1485.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Wittmann E, Beaton C, Lewis WG, Hopper AN, Zamawi F, Jackson C, et al. Comparison of patients’ needs and doctors’ perceptions of information requirements related to a diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20(2):187–95. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01169.x.CrossRef

25.

McNair AG, Brookes ST, Kinnersley P, Blazeby JM. What surgeons should tell patients with oesophago-gastric cancer: a cross sectional study of information needs. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(11):1278–86. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.005.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Thrumurthy SG, Morris JJ, Mughal MM, Ward JB. Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1124–31. doi:10.1002/bjs.7537.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hanks GWC. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 4th ed./edited by Geoffrey Hanks … [et al.]. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

28.

Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–35. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Audrey S, Abel J, Blazeby JM, Falk S, Campbell R. What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008;337:a752. doi:10.1136/bmj.a752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Schattner A. What do patients really want to know? QJM. 2002;95(3):135–6.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Levinson W, Hudak P, Tricco AC. A systematic review of surgeon-patient communication: strengths and opportunities for improvement. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(1):3–17. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.023.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2241–52.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):50–2. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13(6):522–5.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1115–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Respect for autonomy. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 57–112.

Title: What surgeons tell patients and what patients want to know before major cancer surgery: a qualitative study
Authors: Angus G. K. McNair
F MacKichan
J. L. Donovan
S. T. Brookes
K. N. L. Avery
S. M. Griffin
T. Crosby
J. M. Blazeby
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2292-3

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

AKT1 E17K mutation profiling in breast cancer: prevalence, concurrent oncogenic alterations, and blood-based detection

The prognostic value of stromal and epithelial periostin expression in human breast cancer: correlation with clinical pathological features and mortality outcome

Relevance of internal time and circadian robustness for cancer patients

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a significant impact on patients’ overall health and productivity: the MPN Landmark survey

MiR-29c regulates the expression of miR-34c and miR-449a by targeting DNA methyltransferase 3a and 3b in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in New Zealand: impacts of socio-demographic factors, breast cancer screening and biology

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer