Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research

Magnetic resonance imaging in late pregnancy to improve labour and delivery outcomes – a systematic literature review

Authors: Shireen Jaufuraully, Brian Dromey, Lisa Story, Anna L David, George Attilakos, Dimitrios Siassakos

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue visualisation which may be useful in late pregnancy to predict labour outcome and maternal/neonatal birth trauma.

Objective

To study if MRI in late pregnancy can predict maternal and neonatal outcomes of labour and birth.

Methods

Systematic review of studies that performed MRI in late pregnancy or immediately postpartum. Studies were included if they imaged maternal pelvic or neonatal structures and assessed birth outcome. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of studies.

Results

Eighteen studies were selected. Twelve studies explored the value of MRI pelvimetry measurement and its utility to predict cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) and vaginal breech birth. Four explored cervical imaging in predicting time interval to birth. Two imaged women in active labour and assessed mouldability of the fetal skull. No marker of CPD had both high sensitivity and specificity for predicting labour outcome. The fetal pelvic index yielded sensitivities between 59 and 60%, and specificities between 34 to 64%. Similarly, although the sensitivity of the cephalopelvic disproportion index in predicting labour outcome was high (85%), specificity was only 56%. In women with breech presentation, MRI was demonstrated to reduce the rates of emergency caesarean section from 35 to 19%, and allowed better selection of vaginal breech birth. Live birth studies showed that the fetal head undergoes a substantial degree of moulding and deformation during cephalic vaginal birth, which is not considered during pelvimetry. There are conflicting studies on the role of MRI in cervical imaging and predicting time interval to birth.

Conclusion

MRI is a promising imaging modality to assess aspects of CPD, yet no current marker of CPD accurately predicts labour outcome. With advances in MRI, it is hoped that novel methods can be developed to better identify individuals at risk of obstructed or pathological labour. Its role in exploring fetal head moulding as a marker of CPD should be further explored.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leitch CR, Walker JJ. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(6):621–6.CrossRef Leitch CR, Walker JJ. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(6):621–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lale S, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.CrossRef Lale S, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Allen VM, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:986–90.CrossRef Allen VM, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:986–90.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Fine EA, Bracken M, Berkowitz RL. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thomas and modified bell methods with manual pelvimetry. Am J Obstetric Gynecol. 1980;137:15–20.CrossRef Fine EA, Bracken M, Berkowitz RL. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thomas and modified bell methods with manual pelvimetry. Am J Obstetric Gynecol. 1980;137:15–20.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ghi T, Eggebo T, Kalache K, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):128–39.CrossRef Ghi T, Eggebo T, Kalache K, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):128–39.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(69):e1–10. Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(69):e1–10.
10.
go back to reference Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Slowinski T, at al. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;37:712–6.CrossRef Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Slowinski T, at al. Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;37:712–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Fotopoulou C, et al. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;206(2):161.E1–5.CrossRef Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Fotopoulou C, et al. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;206(2):161.E1–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A, et al. Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow up study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:851–4.CrossRef Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A, et al. Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow up study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:851–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Korhonen U, Taipale P, Heinonen S. Fetal pelvic index to predict cephalopelvic disproportion – a retrospective clinical cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:615–21.CrossRef Korhonen U, Taipale P, Heinonen S. Fetal pelvic index to predict cephalopelvic disproportion – a retrospective clinical cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:615–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sporri S, Theony HC, Raio L, et al. MR imaging Pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:137–44.CrossRef Sporri S, Theony HC, Raio L, et al. MR imaging Pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:137–44.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fox LK, Huerta-Enochian GS, Jefferson AH, et al. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1679–85.CrossRef Fox LK, Huerta-Enochian GS, Jefferson AH, et al. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1679–85.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sporri S, Hanggi W, Braghetti A, et al. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:902–8.CrossRef Sporri S, Hanggi W, Braghetti A, et al. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:902–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:351–9.CrossRef Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:351–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Li YG, Chen C, Liao KD, et al. Study on the cephalopelvic relationship with cephalic presentation in nulliparous full-term Chinese pregnant women by MRI with three dimensional reconstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(2):433–41.CrossRef Li YG, Chen C, Liao KD, et al. Study on the cephalopelvic relationship with cephalic presentation in nulliparous full-term Chinese pregnant women by MRI with three dimensional reconstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(2):433–41.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zaretsky AJM, McIntire DD, Hatab MR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labour dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5):919–26.CrossRef Zaretsky AJM, McIntire DD, Hatab MR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labour dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5):919–26.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hoffman J, Thomassen K, Stumpp P, Grothoff M, Engel A, Kahn T, et al. New MRI criteria for successful vaginal breech delivery in primiparae. PLoS One. 2016;f11(8):e0161028.CrossRef Hoffman J, Thomassen K, Stumpp P, Grothoff M, Engel A, Kahn T, et al. New MRI criteria for successful vaginal breech delivery in primiparae. PLoS One. 2016;f11(8):e0161028.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Klemt A-S, Schulze S, Bruggmann D, et al. MRI based pelvimetric measurements as predictors for a successful vaginal breech delivery in the Frankfurt breech at term cohort (FRABAT). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;232:10–7.CrossRef Klemt A-S, Schulze S, Bruggmann D, et al. MRI based pelvimetric measurements as predictors for a successful vaginal breech delivery in the Frankfurt breech at term cohort (FRABAT). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;232:10–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Berger R. The prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for the management of breech delivery. Eur J Obs Gynecol Repro Bio. 1994;55(2):97–103.CrossRef Berger R. The prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for the management of breech delivery. Eur J Obs Gynecol Repro Bio. 1994;55(2):97–103.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Van Loon AJ, Mantingh A, Serlier EK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. Lancet. 1997;350(9094):1799–804.CrossRef Van Loon AJ, Mantingh A, Serlier EK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. Lancet. 1997;350(9094):1799–804.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bamberg C, Deprest J, Sindhwani N, et al. Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(3):305–8.CrossRef Bamberg C, Deprest J, Sindhwani N, et al. Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(3):305–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ami O, Maran JC, Gabor P, et al. Three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of fetal head molding and brain shape changes during the second stage of labour. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0215721.CrossRef Ami O, Maran JC, Gabor P, et al. Three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of fetal head molding and brain shape changes during the second stage of labour. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0215721.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sabir N, Dicle O, Yurdakul B, et al. Can magnetic resonance imaging predict the success of parturition in oxytocin-induced pregnant women? Eur Radiol. 2000;10:768–71.CrossRef Sabir N, Dicle O, Yurdakul B, et al. Can magnetic resonance imaging predict the success of parturition in oxytocin-induced pregnant women? Eur Radiol. 2000;10:768–71.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Chan YL, Lam WW, Lau TK, et al. Cervical assessment by magnetic resonance imaging – its relationship to gestational age and interval to delivery. Br J Radiol. 1998;71(842):155–9.CrossRef Chan YL, Lam WW, Lau TK, et al. Cervical assessment by magnetic resonance imaging – its relationship to gestational age and interval to delivery. Br J Radiol. 1998;71(842):155–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pates JA, Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, et al. Determining cervical ripeness and labor outcome. The efficacy of magnetic resonance T2 relaxation times. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:326–30.CrossRef Pates JA, Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, et al. Determining cervical ripeness and labor outcome. The efficacy of magnetic resonance T2 relaxation times. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:326–30.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tejada BM, Faltin DL, Kinkel K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix in women at high risk for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1392–7.CrossRef Tejada BM, Faltin DL, Kinkel K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix in women at high risk for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1392–7.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Morgan MA, Thurnau GR, Fishburne JI Jr. The fetal–pelvic index as an indicator of fetal–pelvic disproportion: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:608–13.CrossRef Morgan MA, Thurnau GR, Fishburne JI Jr. The fetal–pelvic index as an indicator of fetal–pelvic disproportion: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:608–13.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Abitbol MM, Taylor UB, Castillo I, et al. The cephalopelvic disproportion index: combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:369–73. Abitbol MM, Taylor UB, Castillo I, et al. The cephalopelvic disproportion index: combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:369–73.
34.
go back to reference Caldwell WE, Moloy HC. Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1933;26:479–505.CrossRef Caldwell WE, Moloy HC. Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1933;26:479–505.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging in late pregnancy to improve labour and delivery outcomes – a systematic literature review
Authors
Shireen Jaufuraully
Brian Dromey
Lisa Story
Anna L David
George Attilakos
Dimitrios Siassakos
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05290-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2022 Go to the issue