Top

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Enablers and barriers for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to achieve optimal glycaemic control – a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Authors: Ruth Martis, Julie Brown, Judith McAra-Couper, Caroline A. Crowther

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Glycaemic target recommendations vary widely between international professional organisations for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Some studies have reported women’s experiences of having GDM, but little is known how this relates to their glycaemic targets. The aim of this study was to identify enablers and barriers for women with GDM to achieve optimal glycaemic control.

Methods

Women with GDM were recruited from two large, geographically different, hospitals in New Zealand to participate in a semi-structured interview to explore their views and experiences focusing on enablers and barriers to achieving optimal glycaemic control. Final thematic analysis was performed using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results

Sixty women participated in the study. Women reported a shift from their initial negative response to accepting their diagnosis but disliked the constant focus on numbers. Enablers and barriers were categorised into ten domains across the three study questions. Enablers included: the ability to attend group teaching sessions with family and hear from women who have had GDM; easy access to a diabetes dietitian with diet recommendations tailored to a woman’s context including ethnic food and financial considerations; free capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring equipment, health shuttles to take women to appointments; child care when attending clinic appointments; and being taught CBG testing by a community pharmacist. Barriers included: lack of health information, teaching sessions, consultations, and food diaries in a woman’s first language; long waiting times at clinic appointments; seeing a different health professional every clinic visit; inconsistent advice; no tailored physical activities assessments; not knowing where to access appropriate information on the internet; unsupportive partners, families, and workplaces; and unavailability of social media or support groups for women with GDM. Perceived judgement by others led some women only to share their GDM diagnosis with their partners. This created social isolation.

Conclusion

Women with GDM report multiple enablers and barriers to achieving optimal glycaemic control. The findings of this study may assist health professionals and diabetes in pregnancy services to improve their care for women with GDM and support them to achieve optimal glycaemic control.

ADHB, Auckland District Health Board. National women’s annual clinical report 2015. Auckland: Auckland District Health Board; 2016.

Garrison A. Screening, diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(7):460–7.PubMed

Wu CS, Nohr EA, Bech BH, Vestergaard M, Olsen J. Long-term health outcomes in children born to mothers with diabeetes: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036727.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McCance DR. Pregnancy and diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:945–58.CrossRefPubMed

Bellamy L, Casas J, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:1773–9.CrossRefPubMed

Tieu J, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Preconception care for diabetic women for improving maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007776.pub2.

Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1339–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2477–86.CrossRefPubMed

Lawrence J. Women with diabetes in pregnancy: different perceptions and expectations. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2011;25(1):15–24.CrossRef

10.

Coney S. For the New Zealand guideline group (NZGG). Effective consumer voice and participation for New Zealand. A systematic review of the evidence. Auckland: New Zealand Guideline Group; 2004.

11.

Health and disability commissioners Act 1994. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Reprinted as at 1 December 2014. http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1994/0088/latest/whole.html.

12.

Health and disability services Consumers' rights regulation 1996. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Reprinted as at October 2015. http://www.hdc.org.nz/your-rights/about-the-code/code-of-health-and-disability-services-consumers-rights/.

13.

Morley RF, Norman G, Golder S, Griffith P. A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2016;2:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0049-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Boote JD, Twiddy M, Baird W, Birks Y, Clarke C, Beever D. Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development: a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) research design service (RDS). Health Expect. 2013;18:1481–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

NICE. National Institute for health and clinical excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE guideline NG3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: London; 2015.

16.

Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(4):660–80.CrossRef

18.

Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, et al. A guide to using theoretical domains framework of behavioural change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Cane JOCD, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory- informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

McGoldrick EL, Crawford T, Brown JA, Groom KM, Crowther CA. Consumers attitudes and beliefs towards the receipt of antenatal corticosteroids and use of clinical practice guidelines. 2016;16:259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1043-4.

24.

Burgess C, Wright AJ, Forster AS, Dodhia H, Miller J, Fuller F, et al. Influences on individuals’ decisions to take up the offer of a health check: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2014;18(6):2437–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Penn L, Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, White M. Perspectives of UK Pakistani women on their behaviour change to prevent type 2 diabetes: qualitative study using the theory domain framework. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004530. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Nicholson SL, Donaghy M, Johnston M, Sniehotta FF, van Wijck F, Johnston D, et al. A qualitative theory guided analysis of stroke survivors’ perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(22):1857–68.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health. 2017;40:23–42.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef

29.

Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health J. 2010;33:77–84.

30.

Glanz K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

31.

QSR 2011 International Pty Ltd. NVivo11 qualitative research software. 2011. http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-product/nvivo11-for-windows.

32.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed

33.

New Zealand Census 2013. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/census_counts/2013CensusUsuallyResidentPopulationCounts_HOTP2013Census.aspx. Accessed 31 July 2017.

34.

Counties Manakau Population Count. http://www.health.govt.nz/new-zealand-health-system/my-dhb/counties-manukau-dhb/population-counties-manukau-dhb. Accessed 31 July 2017.

35.

Canterbury Population Count. http://www.health.govt.nz/new-zealand-health-system/my-dhb/canterbury-dhb/population-canterbury-dhb. Accessed 31 July 2017.

36.

Edwards R, Holland J. What is qualitative interviewing? London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc; 2013.

37.

Wright A, Maloney FL, Feblowitz JC. Clinician attitudes toward and use of electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis. BMC Med Info Decis Making. 2011;11:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-36.CrossRef

38.

Sanders LD. Discovering research methods in psychology. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2010.

39.

Kaptein S, Evans M, McTavish S, Banerjee AT, Feig DS, Lowe J, et al. The subjective impact of a diagnosis of gestational diabetes among ethnically diverse pregnant women: a qualitative study. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39(2):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.09.005.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Morrison MK, Lowe JM, Collins CE. Australian women's experiences of living with gestational diabetes. Women Birth. 2014;27(1):52–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2013.10.001.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Parsons J, Ismail K, Amiel S, Forbes A. Perceptions among women with gestational diabetes. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(4):575–85.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Hirst JE, Thach ST, My An TD, Forsyth R, Morris JM, Jeffery HE. Women with gestational diabetes in Vietnam: a qualitative study to determine attitudes and health behaviours. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2012;12(1):81.CrossRef

43.

Collier SA, Mulholland C, Williams J, Mersereau P, Turay K, Prue C. A qualitative study of perceived barriers to management of diabetes among women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy. J Women Health. 2011;20:1333–9.CrossRef

44.

Persson M, Winkvist A, Mogren I. From stun to gradual balance'-women's experiences of living with gestational diabetes mellitus. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24(3):454–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00735.x.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Kalra S, Baruah MP, Gupta Y, Kalra B. Gestational diabetes: an onomastic opportunity. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology. 2013;1(2):91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70104-9.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Devsam BU, Bogossian FE, Peacock AS. An interpretive review of women’s experiences of gestational diabetes mellitus: proposing a framework to enhance midwifery assessment. Women and Birth. 2013;26(2):e69–76.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Evans MK, O'Brien B. Gestational diabetes: the meaning of an at-risk pregnancy. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):66–81.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Carolan-OIah MC. Educational and intervention programmes for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management: an integrative review. Collegian. 2016;23(1):103–14.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Razee H, van der Ploeg HP, Blignault I, Smith BJ, Bauman AE, McLean M, et al. Beliefs, barriers, social support, and environmental influences related to diabetes risk behaviours among women with a history of gestational diabetes. Health Promo J Aust. 2010;21(2):130–7.CrossRef

50.

Carolan M, Gill GK, Steele C. Women’s experiences of factors that facilitate or inhibit gestational diabetes self-management. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12:99. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-99 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Müller U, Hämmerlein A, Casper A, Schulz M. Community pharmacy-based intervention to improve self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients. Pharm Pract. 2006;4(4):195–203.

52.

Mansell K, Evans C, Tran D, Sevany S. The association between self-monitoring of blood glucose, hemoglobin A1C and testing patterns in community pharmacies: results of a pilot study. Cana Pharm J (Ott). 2016;149(1):28–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1715163515618420.CrossRef

53.

Hawkins JS, Casey BM, Lo JY, Moss K, DD MI, Leveno KJ. Weekly compared with daily blood glucose monitoring in women with diet-treated gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1307–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a45a93.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Han S, Middleton P, Shepherd E, Van Ryswyk E, Crowther CA. Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009275.pub3.

55.

Wang C, Guelfi KJ, Yang H. Exercise and its role in gestational diabetes mellitus. Chronic DisTrans Med. 2016;2:208–14.

56.

Hui AL, Sevenhuysen G, Harvey D, Salamon E. Barriers and coping strategies of women with gestational diabetes to follow dietary advice. Women Birth. 2014;27:292–7.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Balas-Nakash M, Rodríguez-Cano A, Muñoz-Manrique C, Vásquez-Peña P, Perichart-Perera O. Adherence to a medical nutrition therapy program in pregnant women with diabetes, measured by three methods, and its association with glycemic control. Clin Trans Invest. 2010;62(3):235–43.

58.

Kapur K, Kapur A, Ramachandran S, Mohan V, Aravind SR, Badgandi M, et al. Barriers to changing dietary behavior. J Assoc Physic India. 2008;56:27–32.

59.

Lapolla A, Di Cianni G, Di Benedetto A, Franzetti I, Napoli A, Sciacca L, et al. Quality of life, wishes, and needs in women with gestational diabetes: Italian DAWN pregnancy study. Int J Endocrinol. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/784726.

60.

Bhavadharini B, Deepa M, Nallaperumal S, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Knowledge about gestational diabetes mellitus amongst pregnant women in South Tamil Nadu. J Diabetol. 2017;8(1):22–6.CrossRef

61.

Hussain Z, Yusoff ZM, Sulaiman SA. Evaluation of knowledge regarding gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with glycaemic level: a Malaysian study. Prim Care Diab. 2015;9(3):184–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.07.007.CrossRef

62.

Work base Education Trust. Māori health literacy research: gestational diabetes mellitus. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2014.

63.

Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B, Robertson S, Johnson JA. Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(3):444–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z.CrossRefPubMed

64.

ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Committee opinion no. 650. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e135–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001214.CrossRef

65.

Russo LM, Nobles C, Ertel KA, Chasan-Taber L, Whitcomb BW. Physical activity interventions in pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):576–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000691.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Momeni Javid F, Simbar M, Dolatian M, Alavi Majd H, Mahmoodi Z. A comparative study on dietary style and physical activity of women with and without gestational diabetes. Acta Medica Iranica. 2016;54(10):651–6.PubMed

67.

Mudd LM, Owe KM, Mottola MF, Pivarnik JM. Health benefits of physical activity during pregnancy: an international perspective. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2013;45(2):268–77.CrossRef

68.

Brown J, Ceysens G, Boulvain M. Exercise for pregnant women with gestational diabetes for improving maternal and fetal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012202.pub2.

69.

Bao W, Tobias DK, Bowers K, Chavarro J, Vaag A, Grunnet LG, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors associated with risk of progression from gestational diabetes mellitus to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(7):1047–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Khooshehchin TE, Keshavarz Z, Afrakhteh M, Shakibazadeh E, Faghihzadeh S. Perceived needs in women with gestational diabetes: a qualitative study. Elect Physic. 2016;8(12):3412–20. https://doi.org/10.19082/3412.CrossRef

71.

Greenhalgh T, Clinch M, Afsar N, Choudhury Y, Sudra R, Campbell-Richards D, et al. Socio-cultural influences on the behaviour of south Asian women with diabetes in pregnancy: qualitative study using a multi-level theoretical approach. BMC Med. 2015;13:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0360-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Miller TA, DiMatteo MR. Importance of family/social support and impact on adherence to diabetic therapy. Diab Metabol Syndrome Obes Targets Therapy. 2013;6:421–6.CrossRef

73.

Mayberry LS, Osborn CY. Family support, medication adherence and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1239–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Bandyopadhyay M. Tackling complexities in understanding the social determinants of health: the contribution of ethnographic research. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 5):S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S5-S6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Ghaffari F, Salsali M, Rahnavard Z, Parvizy S. Compliance with treatment regimen in women with gestational diabetes: living with fear. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(7Suppl1):S103–11.PubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Schabert J, Browne JL, Mosely K, Speight J. Social stigma in diabetes: a framework to understand a growing problem for an increasing epidemic. Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2013;6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-012-0001-0.CrossRef

77.

Abdoli S, Mardanian L, Mirzaei M. How public perceives diabetes: a qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(5):370–4.PubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Enablers and barriers for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to achieve optimal glycaemic control – a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework
Authors: Ruth Martis
Julie Brown
Judith McAra-Couper
Caroline A. Crowther
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1710-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Enablers and barriers for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to achieve optimal glycaemic control – a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Male partner attendance at antenatal care and adherence to antenatal care guidelines: secondary analysis of 2011 Ethiopian demographic and health survey data

Comparison of the effect of breast pump stimulation and oxytocin administration on the length of the third stage of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, and anemia: a randomized controlled trial

Companionship during facility-based childbirth: results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya

Evaluation of neonatal and maternal morbidity in mothers with gestational diabetes: a population-based study

Effects of oxytocin and anaesthesia on vascular tone in pregnant women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study using non-invasive pulse wave analysis

Association between fluid management and dilutional coagulopathy in severe postpartum haemorrhage: a nationwide retrospective cohort study