Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Disabled women’s experiences of accessing and utilising maternity services when they are affected by domestic abuse: a critical incident technique study

Authors: Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Jenna P. Breckenridge, John Devaney, Thilo Kroll, Anne Lazenbatt, Julie Taylor

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Women and their babies are entitled to equal access to high quality maternity care. However, when women fit into two or more categories of vulnerability they can face multiple, compound barriers to accessing and utilising services. Disabled women are up to three times more likely to experience domestic abuse than non-disabled women. Domestic abuse may compromise health service access and utilisation and disabled people in general have suboptimal access to healthcare services. Despite this, little is known about the compounding effects of disability and domestic abuse on women’s access to maternity care.

Methods

The aim of the study was to identify how women approach maternity care services, their expectations of services and whether they are able to get the type of care that they need and want. We conducted a qualitative, Critical Incident Technique study in Scotland. Theoretically we drew on Andersen’s model of healthcare use. The model was congruent with our interest in women’s intended/actual use of maternity services and the facilitators and barriers impacting their access to care. Data were generated during 2013 using one-to-one interviews.

Results

Five women took part and collectively reported 45 critical incidents relating to accessing and utilising maternity services. Mapped to the underpinning theoretical framework, our findings show how the four domains of attitudes; knowledge; social norms; and perceived control are important factors shaping maternity care experiences.

Conclusions

Positive staff attitude and empowering women to have control over their own care is crucial in influencing women’s access to and utilisation of maternity healthcare services. Moreover these are cyclical, with the consequences and outcomes of healthcare use becoming part of the enabling or disabling factors affecting future healthcare decisions.Further consideration needs to be given to the development of strategies to access and recruit women in these circumstances. This will provide an opportunity for under-represented and silenced voices to be heard.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2013. WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
2.
go back to reference WHO. Violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2009. WHO. Violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2009.
3.
go back to reference EU Agency for Fundamental Rights. Violence against women: an EU wide survey. Luxembourg: EU Agency for Fundamental Rights; 2014. EU Agency for Fundamental Rights. Violence against women: an EU wide survey. Luxembourg: EU Agency for Fundamental Rights; 2014.
4.
go back to reference Home Office. Cross-government definition of domestic violence – a consultation: summary of responses. London: Home Office; 2012. Home Office. Cross-government definition of domestic violence – a consultation: summary of responses. London: Home Office; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Hague G, Thiara RK, Mullender A. Disabled women, domestic violence: and social care: the risk of isolation, vulnerability and neglect. BJSW. 2010;41:148–65.CrossRef Hague G, Thiara RK, Mullender A. Disabled women, domestic violence: and social care: the risk of isolation, vulnerability and neglect. BJSW. 2010;41:148–65.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barranti C, Yuen F. Intimate partner violence and women with disabilities. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2008;7:115–30.CrossRefPubMed Barranti C, Yuen F. Intimate partner violence and women with disabilities. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2008;7:115–30.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Martin SL, Rentz ED, Chan RL, Givens J, Sanford CP, Kupper LL et al. Physical and sexual violence among North Carolina women: Associations with physical health, mental health, and functional impairment. Women’s Health Issues 2008, 18: 130–140. 2008;18:130–40. Martin SL, Rentz ED, Chan RL, Givens J, Sanford CP, Kupper LL et al. Physical and sexual violence among North Carolina women: Associations with physical health, mental health, and functional impairment. Women’s Health Issues 2008, 18: 130–140. 2008;18:130–40.
9.
go back to reference Slayter E. Intimate partner violence against women with disabilities. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2009;18:182–99.CrossRef Slayter E. Intimate partner violence against women with disabilities. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2009;18:182–99.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brownridge DA. Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women. 2006;12:805–22.CrossRefPubMed Brownridge DA. Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women. 2006;12:805–22.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Radford J, Harne L, Trotter J. Disabled women and domestic violence as violent crime. Soc Work Action. 2006;18:233–46. Radford J, Harne L, Trotter J. Disabled women and domestic violence as violent crime. Soc Work Action. 2006;18:233–46.
12.
go back to reference Nosek MA, Hughes RB, Taylor HB, Taylor P. Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abuse women with physical disabilities. Violence Against Women. 2006;12:838–50.CrossRefPubMed Nosek MA, Hughes RB, Taylor HB, Taylor P. Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abuse women with physical disabilities. Violence Against Women. 2006;12:838–50.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kroll T, Jones GC, Kehn M, Neri MT. Barriers and strategies affecting the utilisation of primary preventative services for people with physical disabilities. Health Social Care Commun. 2006;14:284–93.CrossRef Kroll T, Jones GC, Kehn M, Neri MT. Barriers and strategies affecting the utilisation of primary preventative services for people with physical disabilities. Health Social Care Commun. 2006;14:284–93.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lightfoot E, Williams O. The intersection of disability, diversity, and domestic violence. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2009;18:133–52.CrossRef Lightfoot E, Williams O. The intersection of disability, diversity, and domestic violence. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2009;18:133–52.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bacchus L, Mezey G, Bewley S, Haworth A. Prevalence of domestic violence when midwives routinely enquire in pregnancy. BJOG. 2004;111:441–5.CrossRefPubMed Bacchus L, Mezey G, Bewley S, Haworth A. Prevalence of domestic violence when midwives routinely enquire in pregnancy. BJOG. 2004;111:441–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lazenbatt A, Taylor J, Cree L. A healthy settings framework: an evaluation and comparison of midwives’ responses to addressing domestic violence in pregnancy. Midwifery. 2009;25:622–36.CrossRefPubMed Lazenbatt A, Taylor J, Cree L. A healthy settings framework: an evaluation and comparison of midwives’ responses to addressing domestic violence in pregnancy. Midwifery. 2009;25:622–36.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shah PS, Shah J. Maternal exposure to domestic violence and pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Women’s Health. 2010;19:2017–31.CrossRef Shah PS, Shah J. Maternal exposure to domestic violence and pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Women’s Health. 2010;19:2017–31.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lewis G. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths. London: National Patient Safety Agency; 2011. Lewis G. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths. London: National Patient Safety Agency; 2011.
19.
go back to reference O’Reilly R, Beale B, Gillies D. Screening and intervention for domestic violence during pregnancy care: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11:190–201.CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly R, Beale B, Gillies D. Screening and intervention for domestic violence during pregnancy care: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11:190–201.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bailey BA, Daugherty RA. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: incidence and associated health behaviours in a rural population. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11:495–503.CrossRefPubMed Bailey BA, Daugherty RA. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: incidence and associated health behaviours in a rural population. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11:495–503.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Akyuz A, Sahiner G, Bakir B. Marital violence: Is it a factor affecting the reproductive health status of women? J Fam Violence. 2008;23:437–45.CrossRef Akyuz A, Sahiner G, Bakir B. Marital violence: Is it a factor affecting the reproductive health status of women? J Fam Violence. 2008;23:437–45.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Breckenridge JP, Devaney J, Kroll T, Lazenbatt A, Taylor J, Bradbury-Jones C. Access and utilisation of maternity care for disabled women who experience domestic abuse. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:234–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Breckenridge JP, Devaney J, Kroll T, Lazenbatt A, Taylor J, Bradbury-Jones C. Access and utilisation of maternity care for disabled women who experience domestic abuse. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:234–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Redshaw M, Malouf R, Gao H, Gray R. Women with disability: the experience of maternity care during pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:1–14.CrossRef Redshaw M, Malouf R, Gao H, Gray R. Women with disability: the experience of maternity care during pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:1–14.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sumilo D, Kurinczul JJ, Redshaw ME, Gray R. Prevalence and impact of disability in women who had recently given birth in the UK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:31–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sumilo D, Kurinczul JJ, Redshaw ME, Gray R. Prevalence and impact of disability in women who had recently given birth in the UK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:31–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Thiara RK, Hague G. Disabled women and domestic violence: increased risk but fewer services. In: Roulstone A, Mason-Bish H, editors. Disability, hate crime and violence. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010. Thiara RK, Hague G. Disabled women and domestic violence: increased risk but fewer services. In: Roulstone A, Mason-Bish H, editors. Disability, hate crime and violence. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010.
26.
go back to reference Thiara RK, Hague G, Mullender A. Losing out on both counts: disabled women and domestic violence. Disabil Society. 2011;26:757–71.CrossRef Thiara RK, Hague G, Mullender A. Losing out on both counts: disabled women and domestic violence. Disabil Society. 2011;26:757–71.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hague G, Thiara RK, Magowan P. Disabled women and domestic violence. Bristol: Women’s Aid Federation England; 2007. Hague G, Thiara RK, Magowan P. Disabled women and domestic violence. Bristol: Women’s Aid Federation England; 2007.
28.
go back to reference Bradbury-Jones C, Taylor J, Herber O. How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology. Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:135–41.CrossRefPubMed Bradbury-Jones C, Taylor J, Herber O. How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology. Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:135–41.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioural model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.CrossRefPubMed Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioural model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bradley EH, McGraw SA, Curry L, Buckser A, King KL, Kasl SV, et al. Expanding the Andersen model: the role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1221–42. Bradley EH, McGraw SA, Curry L, Buckser A, King KL, Kasl SV, et al. Expanding the Andersen model: the role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1221–42.
32.
go back to reference Mackian S, Bedri N, Lovel H. Up the garden path and over the edge: where might health-seeking behaviour take us? Health Policy Plann. 2004;19:137–46.CrossRef Mackian S, Bedri N, Lovel H. Up the garden path and over the edge: where might health-seeking behaviour take us? Health Policy Plann. 2004;19:137–46.CrossRef
34.
35.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Research Nurs Health. 1995;18:179–83.CrossRef Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Research Nurs Health. 1995;18:179–83.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bradbury‐Jones C, Tranter S. Inconsistent use of the critical incident technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2008;64:399–407.CrossRefPubMed Bradbury‐Jones C, Tranter S. Inconsistent use of the critical incident technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2008;64:399–407.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio A. Fifty years of the critical incident technique. Qual Res. 2005;5:475–97.CrossRef Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio A. Fifty years of the critical incident technique. Qual Res. 2005;5:475–97.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994.
39.
go back to reference Ellsberg M, Heise L. Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research. Lancet. 2002;359:1599–604.CrossRefPubMed Ellsberg M, Heise L. Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research. Lancet. 2002;359:1599–604.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kopac CA, Fritz J. The availability and accessibility of gynaecological and reproductive services for women with developmental disabilities: a nursing perspective. Clin Excell Nurse Practitioners. 2004;8:35–42. Kopac CA, Fritz J. The availability and accessibility of gynaecological and reproductive services for women with developmental disabilities: a nursing perspective. Clin Excell Nurse Practitioners. 2004;8:35–42.
43.
go back to reference Smith E, Murray SF, Yousafzai AK, Kasonka L. Barriers to accessing safe motherhood and reproductive health services: the situation of women with disabilities in Lusaka, Zambia. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;2:121–7.CrossRef Smith E, Murray SF, Yousafzai AK, Kasonka L. Barriers to accessing safe motherhood and reproductive health services: the situation of women with disabilities in Lusaka, Zambia. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;2:121–7.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Carolan M. Hodnett E With woman’ philosophy: examining the evidence, answering the questions. Nurs Inq. 2007;14(2):140–52.CrossRefPubMed Carolan M. Hodnett E With woman’ philosophy: examining the evidence, answering the questions. Nurs Inq. 2007;14(2):140–52.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Shields SG, Candib LM. Woman-centered care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Radcliffe; 2010. Shields SG, Candib LM. Woman-centered care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Radcliffe; 2010.
46.
go back to reference Barbour A. Caring for patients: a critique of the medical model. CA: University press; 1995. Barbour A. Caring for patients: a critique of the medical model. CA: University press; 1995.
48.
go back to reference Thompson R, Miller YD. Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:62–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson R, Miller YD. Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:62–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Montalvo Liendo N. Cross-cultural factors in disclosure of intimate partner violence: an integrated review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;1:20–34.CrossRef Montalvo Liendo N. Cross-cultural factors in disclosure of intimate partner violence: an integrated review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;1:20–34.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Spangaro JM, Zwi AB, Poulos RG. “Persist, persist”: A qualitative study of women’s decisions to disclose and their perceptions of the impact of routine screening for intimate partner violence. Psychol Violence. 2011;1:150–62.CrossRef Spangaro JM, Zwi AB, Poulos RG. “Persist, persist”: A qualitative study of women’s decisions to disclose and their perceptions of the impact of routine screening for intimate partner violence. Psychol Violence. 2011;1:150–62.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Salmon D, Baird KM, White P: Women’s views and experiences of antenatal enquiry for domestic abuse during pregnancy. Health Expectations 2013, 1-12. doi: 10.1111/hex.12060. [Epub ahead of print]. Salmon D, Baird KM, White P: Women’s views and experiences of antenatal enquiry for domestic abuse during pregnancy. Health Expectations 2013, 1-12. doi: 10.​1111/​hex.​12060. [Epub ahead of print].
53.
go back to reference Thomas C. The baby and the bath water: disabled women and motherhood in social context. Sociol Health Illness. 1997;19:622–543.CrossRef Thomas C. The baby and the bath water: disabled women and motherhood in social context. Sociol Health Illness. 1997;19:622–543.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Bacchus L, Mezey G, Bewley S. Women’s perceptions and experiences of routine screening for domestic violence in a maternity service. BJOG. 2002;109:9–16.CrossRef Bacchus L, Mezey G, Bewley S. Women’s perceptions and experiences of routine screening for domestic violence in a maternity service. BJOG. 2002;109:9–16.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Homeyard C, Gaudion A. Aiming for equal access to maternity care for all. Practising Midwife. 2014;17(1):13–6.PubMed Homeyard C, Gaudion A. Aiming for equal access to maternity care for all. Practising Midwife. 2014;17(1):13–6.PubMed
56.
go back to reference Nations U. Millennium development goals report. Geneva: UN; 2014. Nations U. Millennium development goals report. Geneva: UN; 2014.
57.
go back to reference Victora CG, Black RE, Bryce J. Learning from new initiatives in maternal and child health. Lancet. 2007;370:1113–4.CrossRefPubMed Victora CG, Black RE, Bryce J. Learning from new initiatives in maternal and child health. Lancet. 2007;370:1113–4.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Piotrowski K, Snell L. Health needs of women with disabilities across the lifespan. J Obstetric Gynaecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007;36:79–87.CrossRef Piotrowski K, Snell L. Health needs of women with disabilities across the lifespan. J Obstetric Gynaecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007;36:79–87.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Walsh-Gallagher D, Sinclair M, McConkey R. The ambiguity of disabled women’s experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: A phenomenological understanding. Midwifery. 2012;28:156–62.CrossRefPubMed Walsh-Gallagher D, Sinclair M, McConkey R. The ambiguity of disabled women’s experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: A phenomenological understanding. Midwifery. 2012;28:156–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Disabled women’s experiences of accessing and utilising maternity services when they are affected by domestic abuse: a critical incident technique study
Authors
Caroline Bradbury-Jones
Jenna P. Breckenridge
John Devaney
Thilo Kroll
Anne Lazenbatt
Julie Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0616-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015 Go to the issue