Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Implementing online group model building to unravel complex geriatric problems, a methodological description

Authors: Oscar S Smeekes, Hanna C Willems, Ilse Blomberg, Etiënne A J A Rouwette, Bianca M Buurman

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Group model building (GMB), is a qualitative focus group like study design from the field of system dynamics, that leads a group of topic experts (often key stakeholders of a problem), through a set of scripted activities to create a conceptual model of their shared view on this problems’ key contributing factors and their interactions. By offering a specific step wise approach to the complexity of a problem, GMB has provided better understanding and overview of complex problems across different scientific domains, in addition to traditional research methods. As the development of geriatric syndromes and organization of geriatric care are often complex issues that are difficult to research, understand and resolve, GMB might be a useful methodology to better address these issues. This study aimed to describe the methodology of online GMB using a geriatric case study.

Methods

Four online GMB sessions were designed by two clinician researchers. A GMB methodology expert was consulted for optimal design. Scriptapedia scripts formed the core of the sessions. These scripts were adapted to the online format. Experts were recruited purposefully and included seven local health care professionals, one patient representative and one healthcare insurance data analyst. The outcome was a conceptual model of older adults’ emergency department visits, which was discussed in a separate article.

Results

During implementation of these four sessions, the sessions were adjusted and two extra (non-scripted) sessions were added because defining unambiguous contributing factors to the geriatric case was challenging for the experts. Paraphrasing, categorizing, iterative plenary reflection, and reserving extra time were used to help experts overcome this challenge. All sessions were held in April and May 2021.

Conclusion

This study shows that GMB can help unravel complex problems in geriatrics, both pathophysiological as organizational, by creating step wise overview of their key contributing factors and interactions. Furthermore, it shows that GMB can be used by clinicians, researchers and health policy makers to better understand complex geriatric problems. Moreover, this paper can help to overcome specific implementational challenges in the geriatric field.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haji A, Saryazdi G, Ghatari AR, et al. Group Model Building: a systematic review of the literature. J Bus School. 2020;3:98–136. Haji A, Saryazdi G, Ghatari AR, et al. Group Model Building: a systematic review of the literature. J Bus School. 2020;3:98–136.
2.
go back to reference Andersen DF, Richardson GP. Scripts for group model building. Syst Dyn Rev. 1997;13:107–29.CrossRef Andersen DF, Richardson GP. Scripts for group model building. Syst Dyn Rev. 1997;13:107–29.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hovmand PS, Profile S, Rouwette EAJA et al. Scriptapedia: A Handbook of Scripts for Developing Structured Group Model Building., 2011. Hovmand PS, Profile S, Rouwette EAJA et al. Scriptapedia: A Handbook of Scripts for Developing Structured Group Model Building., 2011.
4.
go back to reference Richardson GP, Andersen DF. Teamwork in Group Model Building. Syst Dyn Rev. 1995;11:113–37.CrossRef Richardson GP, Andersen DF. Teamwork in Group Model Building. Syst Dyn Rev. 1995;11:113–37.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vennix JAM. Group Model Building: facilitating Team Learning using System Dynamics. New York: J. Wiley; 1996. Vennix JAM. Group Model Building: facilitating Team Learning using System Dynamics. New York: J. Wiley; 1996.
6.
7.
go back to reference Sterman J. Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a Complex World. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000. Sterman J. Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and modelling for a Complex World. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, et al. Geriatric Syndromes: clinical, Research and Policy Implications of a Core Geriatric Concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:780–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, et al. Geriatric Syndromes: clinical, Research and Policy Implications of a Core Geriatric Concept. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:780–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Uleman JF, Melis RJF, Quax R, et al. Mapping the multicausality of Alzheimer’s disease through group model building. Geroscience. 2021;43:829–43.CrossRefPubMed Uleman JF, Melis RJF, Quax R, et al. Mapping the multicausality of Alzheimer’s disease through group model building. Geroscience. 2021;43:829–43.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rockwood K, Howlett SE. Fifteen years of progress in understanding frailty and health in aging. BMC Med. 2018;16:1–4.CrossRef Rockwood K, Howlett SE. Fifteen years of progress in understanding frailty and health in aging. BMC Med. 2018;16:1–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. Complexity and health - yesterday’s traditions, tomorrow’s future. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:543–8.CrossRefPubMed Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. Complexity and health - yesterday’s traditions, tomorrow’s future. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:543–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lipsitz LA. Understanding health care as a complex system: the foundation for unintended consequences. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;308:243–4.CrossRefPubMed Lipsitz LA. Understanding health care as a complex system: the foundation for unintended consequences. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;308:243–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Darabi N, Hosseinichimeh N. System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review. Syst Dyn Rev. 2020;36:29–73.CrossRef Darabi N, Hosseinichimeh N. System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review. Syst Dyn Rev. 2020;36:29–73.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Davahli MR, Karwowski W, Taiar R. A system dynamics simulation applied to healthcare: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–27.CrossRef Davahli MR, Karwowski W, Taiar R. A system dynamics simulation applied to healthcare: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–27.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mahamoud A, Roche B, Homer J. Modelling the social determinants of health and simulating short-term and long-term intervention impacts for the city of Toronto, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:247–55.CrossRefPubMed Mahamoud A, Roche B, Homer J. Modelling the social determinants of health and simulating short-term and long-term intervention impacts for the city of Toronto, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:247–55.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wilkerson B, Aguiar A, Gkini C, et al. Reflections on adapting group model building scripts into online workshops. Syst Dyn Rev. 2020;36:358–72.CrossRef Wilkerson B, Aguiar A, Gkini C, et al. Reflections on adapting group model building scripts into online workshops. Syst Dyn Rev. 2020;36:358–72.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zimmermann N, Pluchinotta I, Salvia G, et al. Moving online: reflections from conducting system dynamics workshops in virtual settings. Syst Dyn Rev. 2021;37:59–71.CrossRefPubMed Zimmermann N, Pluchinotta I, Salvia G, et al. Moving online: reflections from conducting system dynamics workshops in virtual settings. Syst Dyn Rev. 2021;37:59–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rouwette EAJA, Korzilius H, Vennix JAM, et al. Modeling as persuasion: the impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior. Syst Dyn Rev. 2011;27:1–21. Rouwette EAJA, Korzilius H, Vennix JAM, et al. Modeling as persuasion: the impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior. Syst Dyn Rev. 2011;27:1–21.
22.
go back to reference Franco LA. Rethinking soft or interventions: models as boundary objects. Eur J Oper Res. 2013;231:720–33.CrossRef Franco LA. Rethinking soft or interventions: models as boundary objects. Eur J Oper Res. 2013;231:720–33.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, Method and Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage publications ltd; 2022.CrossRef Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, Method and Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage publications ltd; 2022.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lane DC, Sterman JD. Jay Wright Forrester. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Vol. 147. Springer New York LLC, 2011, 363–86. Lane DC, Sterman JD. Jay Wright Forrester. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Vol. 147. Springer New York LLC, 2011, 363–86.
29.
go back to reference George P, Richardson. Feedback thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. Cambridge: Pegasus; 1991. George P, Richardson. Feedback thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. Cambridge: Pegasus; 1991.
30.
go back to reference Vermaak H. Using causal loop diagrams to deal with complex issues: mastering an instrument for systematic and interactive change. Consultation for Organizational Change Revisited. Charlotte: Information Age, 2016, 231–54. Vermaak H. Using causal loop diagrams to deal with complex issues: mastering an instrument for systematic and interactive change. Consultation for Organizational Change Revisited. Charlotte: Information Age, 2016, 231–54.
32.
go back to reference Smeekes O, Blomberg I, Willems H et al. A causal loop diagram of older persons’ emergency department visits and interactions of its contributing factors: a group model building approach. Accepted for publication in EGM 2023. Smeekes O, Blomberg I, Willems H et al. A causal loop diagram of older persons’ emergency department visits and interactions of its contributing factors: a group model building approach. Accepted for publication in EGM 2023.
33.
go back to reference Bérard C. Group Model Building using System Dynamics: an analysis of methodological frameworks. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2010;8:35–46. Bérard C. Group Model Building using System Dynamics: an analysis of methodological frameworks. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2010;8:35–46.
34.
go back to reference Martinez-Moyano IJ, Richardson GP. Best practices in system dynamics modeling. Syst Dyn Rev. 2013;29:102–23.CrossRef Martinez-Moyano IJ, Richardson GP. Best practices in system dynamics modeling. Syst Dyn Rev. 2013;29:102–23.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zoom. https://zoom.us/. Zoom. https://​zoom.​us/​.​
39.
go back to reference van Kan GA, Rolland YM, Morley JE, et al. Frailty: toward a clinical definition. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9:71–2.CrossRef van Kan GA, Rolland YM, Morley JE, et al. Frailty: toward a clinical definition. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9:71–2.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference McGarty C, Mavor KI, Skorich DP. Social categorization. Int Encyclopedia Social Behav Sciences: Second Ed 2015:186–91. McGarty C, Mavor KI, Skorich DP. Social categorization. Int Encyclopedia Social Behav Sciences: Second Ed 2015:186–91.
43.
go back to reference Uw onderzoek: WMO-plichtig of niet? | Onderzoekers | Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek. Uw onderzoek: WMO-plichtig of niet? | Onderzoekers | Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek.
44.
go back to reference WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research. Involving Human Subjects – WMA – The World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research. Involving Human Subjects – WMA – The World Medical Association.
Metadata
Title
Implementing online group model building to unravel complex geriatric problems, a methodological description
Authors
Oscar S Smeekes
Hanna C Willems
Ilse Blomberg
Etiënne A J A Rouwette
Bianca M Buurman
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04110-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Geriatrics 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine