Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Geriatrics
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research Article

Understanding the value of social networks in life satisfaction of elderly people: a comparative study of 16 European countries using SHARE data

Authors: Florian Tomini, Sonila M. Tomini, Wim Groot

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Networks of family and friends are a source of support and are generally associated with higher life satisfaction values among older adults. On the other hand, older adults who are satisfied with their life may be more able to develop and maintain a wider social network. For this reason, the causal link between size and composition of the social networks and satisfaction with life is yet to be explored. This paper investigates the effect of the ‘size’, (number of family and friends, and network) and the ‘composition’ (the proportion of friends over total number of persons) of the social network on life satisfaction among older adults (50+). Moreover, we also investigate the patterns of this relation between different European countries.

Method

Data from the 4th wave of Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe and an instrumental variable approach are used to estimate the extent of the relation between life satisfaction and size and composition of social networks.

Results

Respondents in Western and Northern European (WNE) countries report larger networks than respondents in Eastern and Southern European (ESE) countries. However, the positive relationship between network size and life satisfaction is consistent across countries. On the other hand, the share of friends in the network appears to be generally negatively related to satisfaction with life, though results are not statistically significant for all countries.

Conclusions

Apparently, a larger personal network is important for older adults (50+) to be more satisfied with life. Our results suggest that this relation is particularly positive if the network is comprised of family members.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Chan Y, Lee RP. Network size, social support and happiness in later life: a comparative study of Beijing and Hong Kong. J Happiness Stud. 2006;7(1):87–112.CrossRef
2.
Groot W, Van Den Brink HM, Van Praag B. The compensating income variation of social capital. Soc Indic Res. 2007;82(2):189–207.CrossRef
3.
Lim C, Putnam RD. Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. Am Sociol Rev. 2010;75(6):914–33.CrossRef
4.
Litwin H, Shiovitz-Ezra S. Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. Gerontologist. 2011;51(3):379–88.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Litwin H, Stoeckel KJ. Social networks and subjective wellbeing among older Europeans: does age make a difference? Ageing Soc. 2013;33(07):1263–81.CrossRef
6.
Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2000;15(2):187.CrossRefPubMed
7.
van der Horst M, Coffé H. How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being. Soc Indic Res. 2012;107(3):509–29.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Rafnsson SB, Shankar A, Steptoe A. Longitudinal influences of social network characteristics on subjective well-being of older adults: findings from the ELSA study. J Aging Health. 2015;27(5):919–34.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Larson R. Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. J Gerontol. 1978;33(1):109–25.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Usui WM, Keil TJ, Durig KR. Socioeconomic comparisons and life satisfaction of elderly adults. J Gerontol. 1985;40(1):110–4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Burt RS. A note on strangers, friends and happiness. Soc Networks. 1987;9(4):311–31.CrossRef
12.
Baldassare M, Rosenfield S, Rook K. The types of social relations predicting elderly well-being. Res Aging. 1984;6(4):549–59.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Achat H, Kawachi I, Levine S, Berkey C, Coakley E, Colditz G. Social networks, stress and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(8):735–50.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Angelini V, Cavapozzi D, Corazzini L, Paccagnella O. Age, health and life satisfaction among older Europeans. Soc Indic Res. 2012;105(2):293–308.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Baxter J, She’Ierly SM, Eby C, Mason L, Cortese CF, Hamman RF. Social network factors associated with perceived quality of life the San Luis Valley health and aging study. J Aging Health. 1998;10(3):287–310.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Bowling A, Browne PD. Social networks, health, and emotional well-being among the oldest old in London. J Gerontol. 1991;46(1):S20–32.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Choi NG, Wodarski JS. The relationship between social support and health status of elderly people: does social support slow down physical and functional deterioration? Soc Work Res. 1996;20(1):52–63.PubMed
18.
Fiori KL, Antonucci TC, Cortina KS. Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61(1):P25–32.CrossRef
19.
Landau R, Litwin H. Subjective well-being among the Old-Old: the role of health, personality and social support. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2001;52(4):265–80.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Litwin H. Social network type and health status in a national sample of elderly Israelis. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(4–5):599–609.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. A prospective study of social networks in relation to total mortality and cardiovascular disease in men in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50(3):245–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Santini ZI, Koyanagi A, Tyrovolas S, Haro JM, Fiori KL, Uwakwa R, Thiyagarajan JA, Webber M, Prince M, Prina AM. Social network typologies and mortality risk among older people in china, India, and Latin America: a 10/66 dementia research group population-based cohort study. Soc Sci Med. 2015;147:134–43.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Sugisawa H, Liang J, Liu X. Social networks, social support, and mortality among older people in Japan. J Gerontol. 1994;49(1):S3–S13.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Vogt TM, Mullooly JP, Ernst D, Pope CR, Hollis JF. Social networks as predictors of ischemic heart disease, cancer, stroke and hypertension: incidence, survival and mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):659–66.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Giles LC, Glonek GF, Luszcz MA, Andrews GR. Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: the Australian longitudinal study of aging. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(7):574–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Rodriguez-Laso A, Zunzunegui MV, Otero A. The effect of social relationships on survival in elderly residents of a Southern European community: a cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7(1):1–12.CrossRef
28.
29.
Litwin H, Stoeckel K, Schwartz E. Social networks and mental health among older Europeans: are there age effects? Eur J Ageing. 2015;12(4):299–309.CrossRef
30.
Diener E, Suh E. Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Soc Indic Res. 1997;40(1–2):189–216.CrossRef
31.
32.
33.
Auer P, Cazes S. The resilience of the long‐term employment relationship: evidence from the industrialized countries. Int Labour Rev. 2000;139(4):379–408.CrossRef
34.
Larsen J, Axhausen KW, Urry J. Geographies of social networks: meetings, travel and communications. Mobilities. 2006;1(2):261–83.CrossRef
35.
González L, Viitanen TK. The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe. Eur Econ Rev. 2009;53(2):127–38.CrossRef
36.
Haythornthwaite C. Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. Inf Soc. 2002;18(5):385–401.CrossRef
37.
Haythornthwaite C. Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Inf Commun Soc. 2005;8(2):125–47.CrossRef
38.
Neves BB. Does the Internet matter for strong ties? Bonding social capital, Internet use, and age-based inequality. Int Rev Sociol. 2015;25(3):415–33.CrossRef
39.
Reher DS. Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Popul Dev Rev. 1998;24(2):203–34.CrossRef
40.
Reher DS. Family ties in Western Europe. In: Zuanna GD, Micheli GA, editors. Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox? New Perspectives in Interpreting Contemporary Family and Reproductive Behaviour. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2005. pp. 45-76.
41.
Damiani G, Farelli V, Anselmi A, Sicuro L, Solipaca A, Burgio A, Iezzi D, Ricciardi W. Patterns of long term care in 29 European countries: evidence from an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Österle A. Long-term care in central and South-Eastern Europe: challenges and perspectives in addressing a ‘New’ social risk. Soc Policy Adm. 2010;44(4):461–80.CrossRef
43.
Giles LC, Glonek GF, Luszcz MA, Andrews GR. Do social networks affect the use of residential aged care among older Australians? BMC Geriatr. 2007;7(1):1–10.CrossRef
44.
Börsch-Supan A, Brandt M, Hunkler C, Kneip T, Korbmacher J, Malter F, Schaan B, Stuck S, Zuber S. Data resource profile: the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:992–1001. dyt088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Malter F, Börsch-Supan A. SHARE wave 4: innovations & methodology. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy; 2013.
46.
Beckie TM, Hayduk LA. Measuring quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 1997;42(1):21–39.CrossRef
47.
McIntosh CN. Report on the construct validity of the temporal satisfaction with life scale. Soc Indic Res. 2001;54(1):37–56.CrossRef
48.
Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychol Assess. 1993;5(2):164.CrossRef
49.
Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91(434):444–55.CrossRef
50.
Silverman P, Hecht L, McMillin JD. Modeling life satisfaction among the aged: a comparison of Chinese and Americans. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2000;15(4):289–305.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Martikainen L. The many faces of life satisfaction among Finnish young adults’. J Happiness Stud. 2009;10(6):721–37.CrossRef
52.
Zou X, Ingram P, Higgins ET. Social networks and life satisfaction: the interplay of network density and regulatory focus. Motiv Emot. 2015;39(5):693–713.
53.
Staiger D, Stock JH. Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica. 1997;65(3):557–86.
54.
Stock JH, Yogo M. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression, Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg. 2005.CrossRef
55.
Rözer J, Mollenhorst G, Poortman A.-R. Family and Friends: Which Types of Personal Relationships Go Together in a Network? Soc Indic Res. 2016;127(2):809–26.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Seeman TE, Berkman LF. Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(7):737–49.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90(430):443–50.
58.
Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S. Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing. Stata J. 2003;3(1):1–31.
59.
Hausman JA. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica. 1978;46:1251–71.CrossRef
60.
Wu D-M. Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica. 1973;41:733–50.CrossRef
61.
Wooldridge J. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 2nd ed. New York: South-Western College Publishing; 2012.
62.
Zellner A, Theil H. Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica. 1962;30:54–78.CrossRef
63.
Litwin H, Stoeckel K, Roll A, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Kotte M. Social network measurement in SHARE wave four. SHARE wave. 2013;4:18–38.
64.
George LK. Economic status and subjective well-being: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research. 1992.
65.
Spreitzer E, Snyder EE. Correlates of life satisfaction among the aged. J Gerontol. 1974;29(4):454–8.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Perry CM, Johnson CL. Families and support networks among African American oldest-old. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;38:41–50.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Keller-Cohen D, Fiori K, Toler A, Bybee D. Social relations, language and cognition in the ‘oldest old’. Ageing Soc. 2006;26(04):585–605.CrossRef
68.
Guilley E, Pin S, Spini D, d’Epinay CL, Herrmann F, Michel J-P. Association between social relationships and survival of Swiss octogenarians. A five-year prospective, population-based study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(5):419–25.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Bonsang E. Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? J Health Econ. 2009;28(1):143–54.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Metadata
Title
Understanding the value of social networks in life satisfaction of elderly people: a comparative study of 16 European countries using SHARE data
Authors
Florian Tomini
Sonila M. Tomini
Wim Groot
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0362-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Geriatrics 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Predicting the role of assistive technologies in the lives of people with dementia using objective care recipient factors

Research Article

Effect of anaemia on hand grip strength, walking speed, functionality and 1 year mortality in older hospitalized patients

Research article

“Everyone else gets ice cream here more often than I do—It burns me up” - Perspectives on Diabetes Care from Nursing Home Residents and their Doctors

Research Article

Comparison of self-reported and performance-based measures of functional ability in elderly patients in an emergency department: implications for selection of clinical outcome measures

Research article

Hospitalization of elderly diabetic patients: characteristics, reasons for admission, and gender differences

Research Article

Concurrent validity of the Swedish version of the life-space assessment questionnaire
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits