Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study

Authors: Mairead Murphy, Sandra Hollinghurst, Katrina Turner, Chris Salisbury

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary care clinicians often address multiple patient problems, with a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) which covers this range of outcomes. Consequently, many researchers use PROMs that do not capture the full impact of primary care services. In order to identify what outcomes a PROM for primary care would need to include, we conducted interviews with patients and practitioners. This paper reports these patient and practitioners’ views on the outcomes arising from primary care consultations.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were held with 30 patients and eight clinicians across five sites in Bristol. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. We used a broad definition of health outcome as ‘the impacts of healthcare on health, or a patient’s ability to impact health’ to identify outcomes through this process.

Results

10 outcome groups were identified. These occupied 3 domains:
Health Empowerment: These are the internal and external resources which enable patients to improve their health. This involves 1) patients’ understanding of their illnesses, 2) ability to self-care and stay healthy, 3) agreeing and adhering to a patient-clinician shared plan, 4) confidence in seeking healthcare and 5) access to support.
Health Status: This involves 6) reduction of symptoms and 7) reducing the impact of symptoms on patients’ lives.
Health Perceptions: This involves 8) patients’ satisfaction with their health, 9) health concerns, and 10) confidence in their future health.
The structure, organisation and nature of primary care means it can affect all 3 domains.

Conclusions

No existing PROM captures all these outcomes. For example, many health empowerment PROMs do not consider patient preference on empowerment. Many health status tools are not responsive to changes resulting from primary care. Health perceptions PROMs have generally been designed for measuring personality traits rather than outcomes.
This study provides a platform for designing a new PROM containing outcomes that matter to patients and can be influenced by primary care. Such a PROM would greatly enhance the value of primary care research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Goodall S, Montgomery AA, Pickin DM, Edwards S, Sampson F, et al. Does Advanced Access improve access to primary health care? Questionnaire survey of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):615–21.PubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury C, Goodall S, Montgomery AA, Pickin DM, Edwards S, Sampson F, et al. Does Advanced Access improve access to primary health care? Questionnaire survey of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(541):615–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference O'Cathain A, Coster J, Salisbury C, Pearson T, Maheswaran R, Nicholl J. Do walk-in centres for commuters work? A mixed methods evaluation. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(569):e383–389.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O'Cathain A, Coster J, Salisbury C, Pearson T, Maheswaran R, Nicholl J. Do walk-in centres for commuters work? A mixed methods evaluation. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(569):e383–389.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt TA, Lattimer V, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859–68.CrossRefPubMed Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt TA, Lattimer V, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859–68.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD001271. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub2. Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD001271. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD001271.​pub2.
5.
go back to reference Charlton R. Implications of the new GP contract. Clin Med. 2005;5(1):50–4.CrossRef Charlton R. Implications of the new GP contract. Clin Med. 2005;5(1):50–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? Jama. 2009;301(19):2038–40.CrossRefPubMed Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? Jama. 2009;301(19):2038–40.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Davis K, Abrams M, Stremikis K. How the Affordable Care Act will strengthen the nation's primary care foundation. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1201–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davis K, Abrams M, Stremikis K. How the Affordable Care Act will strengthen the nation's primary care foundation. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1201–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.CrossRefPubMed Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e12–21.CrossRefPubMed Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e12–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Chew-Graham C, et al. Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f2882.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Chew-Graham C, et al. Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f2882.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Thomas CL, Man MS, O'Cathain A, Hollinghurst S, Large S, Edwards L, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long-term conditions: study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas CL, Man MS, O'Cathain A, Hollinghurst S, Large S, Edwards L, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long-term conditions: study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials. Trials. 2014;15:36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandez JL, Beecham J, Hirani SP, Cartwright M, et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f1035.CrossRefPubMed Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandez JL, Beecham J, Hirani SP, Cartwright M, et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f1035.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R. Patient-reported outcomes and performance measurement. In: Smith P, Mossialos M, Leatherman S, I P, editors. Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement: Experiences, Challenges and Prospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Fitzpatrick R. Patient-reported outcomes and performance measurement. In: Smith P, Mossialos M, Leatherman S, I P, editors. Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement: Experiences, Challenges and Prospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
16.
17.
go back to reference Heath I, Rubinstein A, Stange KC, van Driel ML. Quality in primary health care: a multidimensional approach to complexity. BMJ. 2009;338:b1242.CrossRefPubMed Heath I, Rubinstein A, Stange KC, van Driel ML. Quality in primary health care: a multidimensional approach to complexity. BMJ. 2009;338:b1242.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i–iv. 1–74.PubMed Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i–iv. 1–74.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96:5–21.CrossRefPubMed Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96:5–21.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McDowell I: Measuring Health: Oxford University Press; New York: 2006 McDowell I: Measuring Health: Oxford University Press; New York: 2006
23.
go back to reference Venning P, Durie A, Roland M, Roberts C, Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. Bmj. 2000;320(7241):1048–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Venning P, Durie A, Roland M, Roberts C, Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. Bmj. 2000;320(7241):1048–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference McKinley RK, Cragg DK, Hastings AM, French DP, Manku-Scott TK, Campbell SM, et al. Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: The outcome of care. Bmj. 1997;314(7075):190–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McKinley RK, Cragg DK, Hastings AM, French DP, Manku-Scott TK, Campbell SM, et al. Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: The outcome of care. Bmj. 1997;314(7075):190–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ. 1996;312(7037):1016–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ. 1996;312(7037):1016–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference McAteer A, Elliott AM, Hannaford PC. Ascertaining the size of the symptom iceberg in a UK-wide community-based survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e1–11.CrossRefPubMed McAteer A, Elliott AM, Hannaford PC. Ascertaining the size of the symptom iceberg in a UK-wide community-based survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e1–11.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Procter S, Stewart K, Bowen L, Purdy S, Ridd M, et al. The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(616):751–9.CrossRef Salisbury C, Procter S, Stewart K, Bowen L, Purdy S, Ridd M, et al. The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(616):751–9.CrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Peters M, Crocker H, Dummett S, Jenkinson C, Doll H, Gibbons E, et al. Pilot study of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: report to the Department of Health. Quality and Outcomes of Person-centred Care Policy Research Unit (QORU): Oxford; 2013 Peters M, Crocker H, Dummett S, Jenkinson C, Doll H, Gibbons E, et al. Pilot study of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: report to the Department of Health. Quality and Outcomes of Person-centred Care Policy Research Unit (QORU): Oxford; 2013
31.
go back to reference Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15(2):165–71.CrossRefPubMed Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15(2):165–71.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):738–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):738–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Valderas JM, Fitzpatrick R, Roland M. Using health status to measure NHS performance: another step into the dark for the health reform in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(4):352–3.CrossRefPubMed Valderas JM, Fitzpatrick R, Roland M. Using health status to measure NHS performance: another step into the dark for the health reform in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(4):352–3.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
go back to reference Chew-Graham CA, Hunter C, Langer S, Stenhoff A, Drinkwater J, Guthrie EA, et al. How QOF is shaping primary care review consultations: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chew-Graham CA, Hunter C, Langer S, Stenhoff A, Drinkwater J, Guthrie EA, et al. How QOF is shaping primary care review consultations: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.PubMed Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.PubMed
37.
38.
go back to reference Charmaz K: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Department for Communities and Local Government: London; 2006 Charmaz K: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Department for Communities and Local Government: London; 2006
40.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Supplement to the 45th edition. World Health Organisation: New York; 2006. World Health Organisation. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Supplement to the 45th edition. World Health Organisation: New York; 2006.
42.
go back to reference NIHR: UK Clinical Research Network : Portfolio Database: Primary Care Outcomes Study. United Kingdom: UK Clinical Research Network; 2013. NIHR: UK Clinical Research Network : Portfolio Database: Primary Care Outcomes Study. United Kingdom: UK Clinical Research Network; 2013.
44.
go back to reference Bowling A. Measuring Health: A review of quality of life measurement scales, vol. 1. 3rd ed. UK: Open University Press; 2004. Bowling A. Measuring Health: A review of quality of life measurement scales, vol. 1. 3rd ed. UK: Open University Press; 2004.
46.
go back to reference McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C. Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C. Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Great Britain: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Great Britain: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Small N, Bower P, Chew-Graham CA, Whalley D, Protheroe J. Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Small N, Bower P, Chew-Graham CA, Whalley D, Protheroe J. Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Hunter C, Chew-Graham CA, Langer S, Drinkwater J, Stenhoff A, Guthrie EA, et al. ‘I wouldn't push that further because I don't want to lose her’: a multiperspective qualitative study of behaviour change for long-term conditions in primary care. Health Expectations. doi:10.1111/hex.12304 Hunter C, Chew-Graham CA, Langer S, Drinkwater J, Stenhoff A, Guthrie EA, et al. ‘I wouldn't push that further because I don't want to lose her’: a multiperspective qualitative study of behaviour change for long-term conditions in primary care. Health Expectations. doi:10.​1111/​hex.​12304
52.
go back to reference Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Jama. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Jama. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Starfield B. Measurement of Outcome: A Proposed Scheme. Millbank Quarterly. 2005;83:1–11.CrossRef Starfield B. Measurement of Outcome: A Proposed Scheme. Millbank Quarterly. 2005;83:1–11.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(4):580–6.CrossRefPubMed Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(4):580–6.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Petrie KJ, Jago LA, Devcich DA. The role of illness perceptions in patients with medical conditions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20(2):163–7.CrossRefPubMed Petrie KJ, Jago LA, Devcich DA. The role of illness perceptions in patients with medical conditions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20(2):163–7.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Morris S, Sutton M, Gravelle H. Inequity and inequality in the use of health care in England: an empirical investigation. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(6):1251–66.CrossRefPubMed Morris S, Sutton M, Gravelle H. Inequity and inequality in the use of health care in England: an empirical investigation. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(6):1251–66.CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(2):90–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(2):90–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
go back to reference Sheikh A. Ethnic minorities and their perceptions of the quality of primary care. BMJ. 2009;339:b3797.CrossRefPubMed Sheikh A. Ethnic minorities and their perceptions of the quality of primary care. BMJ. 2009;339:b3797.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study
Authors
Mairead Murphy
Sandra Hollinghurst
Katrina Turner
Chris Salisbury
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0323-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Primary Care 1/2015 Go to the issue