Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Sample size calculations for indirect standardization

Authors: Yifei Wang, Philip Chu

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Indirect standardization, and its associated parameter the standardized incidence ratio, is a commonly-used tool in hospital profiling for comparing the incidence of negative outcomes between an index hospital and a larger population of reference hospitals, while adjusting for confounding covariates. In statistical inference of the standardized incidence ratio, traditional methods often assume the covariate distribution of the index hospital to be known. This assumption severely compromises one’s ability to compute required sample sizes for high-powered indirect standardization, as in contexts where sample size calculation is desired, there are usually no means of knowing this distribution. This paper presents novel statistical methodology to perform sample size calculation for the standardized incidence ratio without knowing the covariate distribution of the index hospital and without collecting information from the index hospital to estimate this covariate distribution. We apply our methods to simulation studies and to real hospitals, to assess both its capabilities in a vacuum and in comparison to traditional assumptions of indirect standardization.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christiansen C, Morris C. Improving the Statistical Approach to Health Care Provider Profiling. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:764–8.CrossRefPubMed Christiansen C, Morris C. Improving the Statistical Approach to Health Care Provider Profiling. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:764–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Solberg L, Wang Y, Whitebird R, Lopez-Solano N, Smith-Bindman R. Organizational Factors and Quality Improvement Strategies Associated With Lower Radiation Dose From CT Examinations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17:666–75.CrossRef Solberg L, Wang Y, Whitebird R, Lopez-Solano N, Smith-Bindman R. Organizational Factors and Quality Improvement Strategies Associated With Lower Radiation Dose From CT Examinations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17:666–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Wang Y, Chung R, Lopez-Solano N, Einstein A, et al. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multicomponent Interventions for Reducing Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:666–75.CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Wang Y, Chung R, Lopez-Solano N, Einstein A, et al. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multicomponent Interventions for Reducing Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:666–75.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Farr W. Letter to the Registrar-General on the Causes of Death in England in 1857. Twentieth Ann Rep Registrar-Gen Births Deaths Marriages England. 1859;5:163–78. Farr W. Letter to the Registrar-General on the Causes of Death in England in 1857. Twentieth Ann Rep Registrar-Gen Births Deaths Marriages England. 1859;5:163–78.
6.
7.
go back to reference Krumholz H, Wang Y, Mattera J, Wang Y, Han L, Ingber M, et al. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with heart failure. Circulation. 2006;113:1693–701.CrossRefPubMed Krumholz H, Wang Y, Mattera J, Wang Y, Han L, Ingber M, et al. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with heart failure. Circulation. 2006;113:1693–701.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rothman K, Boice J. Epidemiologic analysis with a programmable calculator (NIH Publication No. 79-1649). Bethesda, MD: U.S: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health; 1979. Rothman K, Boice J. Epidemiologic analysis with a programmable calculator (NIH Publication No. 79-1649). Bethesda, MD: U.S: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health; 1979.
10.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke J. A shortcut method for calculating the 95 percent confidence interval of the standardized mortality ratio. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:303–4.CrossRef Vandenbroucke J. A shortcut method for calculating the 95 percent confidence interval of the standardized mortality ratio. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:303–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ury H, Wiggins A. Another shortcut method for calculating the confidence interval of a Poisson variable (or of a standardized mortality ratio). Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:197–8.CrossRefPubMed Ury H, Wiggins A. Another shortcut method for calculating the confidence interval of a Poisson variable (or of a standardized mortality ratio). Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:197–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gordon I. Sample Size Estimation in Occupational Mortality Studies with Use of Confidence Interval Theory. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125. Gordon I. Sample Size Estimation in Occupational Mortality Studies with Use of Confidence Interval Theory. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125.
13.
go back to reference Silcocks P. Estimating Confidence Limits on a Standardized Mortality Ratio when the Expected Number is Not Error Free. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48:313–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silcocks P. Estimating Confidence Limits on a Standardized Mortality Ratio when the Expected Number is Not Error Free. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48:313–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Beyene J, Moineddin R. Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5. Beyene J, Moineddin R. Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5.
15.
go back to reference Becher H, Winkler V. Estimating the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with incomplete follow-up data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17. Becher H, Winkler V. Estimating the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with incomplete follow-up data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17.
17.
go back to reference Brent R. Algorithms for Minimization Without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1973. Brent R. Algorithms for Minimization Without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1973.
Metadata
Title
Sample size calculations for indirect standardization
Authors
Yifei Wang
Philip Chu
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01912-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2023 Go to the issue