Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups

Authors: Kaat Goorts, Charlotte Vanovenberghe, Charlotte Lambreghts, Eline Bruneel, Dorina Rusu, Marc Du Bois, Sofie Vandenbroeck, Lode Godderis

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasing rates of long-term sickness absence are a worldwide problem. Belgium is the first country in Europe that aims to screen its entire population of sick leavers (sick leave > 6 weeks) for the risk of long-term sickness absence in order to focus resources on the high-risk group and to provide adequate return-to-work support. Our aim was to investigate content and face validity of a newly designed questionnaire (Quickscan) using item prioritization of patients and professionals in the field of long-term sickness absence. This questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature and existing instruments (Goorts et al, J Public Health Res 7:1419, 2018).

Methods

Qualitative data were collected using the nominal group technique. The data were gathered exploring factors that influence return-to work restrictions or opportunities.

Results

Participants indicated 20 out of 21 of the questionnaire factors as important reasons that might influence the return-to-work process. Additionally, 16 factors were discussed that were not yet included in the Quickscan but that might provide useful information on return-to-work issues, according to the participants. In the prioritization of items, we found considerable diversity among participants.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate the validity of the Quickscan items to ask patients about important return-to-work barriers or opportunities. However, additional factors were identified that may improve the assessment of risk for long-term sickness absence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Edwards P, Greasley K. Absence from work. In: Conditions EFftiolaw. Dublin: Eurofound; 2010. Edwards P, Greasley K. Absence from work. In: Conditions EFftiolaw. Dublin: Eurofound; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Kausto J, Pentti J, Oksanen T, Virta LJ, Virtanen M, Kivimaki M, et al. Length of sickness absence and sustained return-to-work in mental disorders and musculoskeletal diseases: a cohort study of public sector employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(4):358–66. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3643 Epub 2017/05/04. PubMed PMID: 28463382.CrossRefPubMed Kausto J, Pentti J, Oksanen T, Virta LJ, Virtanen M, Kivimaki M, et al. Length of sickness absence and sustained return-to-work in mental disorders and musculoskeletal diseases: a cohort study of public sector employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(4):358–66. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5271/​sjweh.​3643 Epub 2017/05/04. PubMed PMID: 28463382.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference de Wind A, Donceel P, Dekkers S, Godderis L. The role of European physicians in the assessment of work disability: a comparative study. Edorium J Disabil Rehabil. 2016;2:78–87. de Wind A, Donceel P, Dekkers S, Godderis L. The role of European physicians in the assessment of work disability: a comparative study. Edorium J Disabil Rehabil. 2016;2:78–87.
6.
go back to reference Mairiaux P, Somville P-R. Incapacité de travail prolongée. Revue des facteurs de risque professionnels et des stratégies d’intervention. Archives des maladies professionnelles et de l’environnement. 2015;76(5):458–67.CrossRef Mairiaux P, Somville P-R. Incapacité de travail prolongée. Revue des facteurs de risque professionnels et des stratégies d’intervention. Archives des maladies professionnelles et de l’environnement. 2015;76(5):458–67.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mairiaux P, Schippers N, Kéfer F, Cornélis S, Donceel P, Somwille P-R. Werkhervatting na een langdurige afwezigheid; 2012. Mairiaux P, Schippers N, Kéfer F, Cornélis S, Donceel P, Somwille P-R. Werkhervatting na een langdurige afwezigheid; 2012.
11.
go back to reference Haynes SN, Richard D, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):238.CrossRef Haynes SN, Richard D, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):238.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vogt DS, King DW, King LA. Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychol Assess. 2004;16(3):231.CrossRef Vogt DS, King DW, King LA. Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychol Assess. 2004;16(3):231.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sanderson T, Hewlett S, Richards P, Morris M, Calnan M. Utilizing qualitative data from nominal groups: exploring the influences on treatment outcome prioritization with rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(1):132–42.CrossRef Sanderson T, Hewlett S, Richards P, Morris M, Calnan M. Utilizing qualitative data from nominal groups: exploring the influences on treatment outcome prioritization with rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(1):132–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195.CrossRef Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Curry LA, KJJHsr D. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRef Bradley EH, Curry LA, KJJHsr D. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Marhold C, Linton SJ, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(2):65–75 PubMed PMID: 12014227.CrossRef Marhold C, Linton SJ, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(2):65–75 PubMed PMID: 12014227.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Ther. 2016;24(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z PubMed PMID: 27610218; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5015229.CrossRef Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Ther. 2016;24(1):32. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12998-016-0113-z PubMed PMID: 27610218; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5015229.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Deci EL, Olafsen AH, RM R, Behavior O. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;4:19–43.CrossRef Deci EL, Olafsen AH, RM R, Behavior O. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;4:19–43.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of long-term sickness absence: content and face validity of a new questionnaire based on qualitative data from nominal groups
Authors
Kaat Goorts
Charlotte Vanovenberghe
Charlotte Lambreghts
Eline Bruneel
Dorina Rusu
Marc Du Bois
Sofie Vandenbroeck
Lode Godderis
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0852-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019 Go to the issue