Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items

Authors: Moonseong Heo, Namhee Kim, Myles S. Faith

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In countless number of clinical trials, measurements of outcomes rely on instrument questionnaire items which however often suffer measurement error problems which in turn affect statistical power of study designs. The Cronbach alpha or coefficient alpha, here denoted by C α , can be used as a measure of internal consistency of parallel instrument items that are developed to measure a target unidimensional outcome construct. Scale score for the target construct is often represented by the sum of the item scores. However, power functions based on C α have been lacking for various study designs.

Methods

We formulate a statistical model for parallel items to derive power functions as a function of C α under several study designs. To this end, we assume fixed true score variance assumption as opposed to usual fixed total variance assumption. That assumption is critical and practically relevant to show that smaller measurement errors are inversely associated with higher inter-item correlations, and thus that greater C α is associated with greater statistical power. We compare the derived theoretical statistical power with empirical power obtained through Monte Carlo simulations for the following comparisons: one-sample comparison of pre- and post-treatment mean differences, two-sample comparison of pre-post mean differences between groups, and two-sample comparison of mean differences between groups.

Results

It is shown that C α is the same as a test-retest correlation of the scale scores of parallel items, which enables testing significance of C α . Closed-form power functions and samples size determination formulas are derived in terms of C α , for all of the aforementioned comparisons. Power functions are shown to be an increasing function of C α , regardless of comparison of interest. The derived power functions are well validated by simulation studies that show that the magnitudes of theoretical power are virtually identical to those of the empirical power.

Conclusion

Regardless of research designs or settings, in order to increase statistical power, development and use of instruments with greater C α , or equivalently with greater inter-item correlations, is crucial for trials that intend to use questionnaire items for measuring research outcomes.

Discussion

Further development of the power functions for binary or ordinal item scores and under more general item correlation strutures reflecting more real world situations would be a valuable future study.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
3.
go back to reference Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1968. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1968.
4.
go back to reference Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(4):350–3.CrossRef Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(4):350–3.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cronbach L. Coefficeint alpha and the internal struture of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.CrossRef Cronbach L. Coefficeint alpha and the internal struture of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. Br Med J. 1997;314(7080):572–2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach’s alpha. Br Med J. 1997;314(7080):572–2.
7.
go back to reference Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha - An exmination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(1):98–104.CrossRef Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha - An exmination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(1):98–104.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sijtsma K. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):107–20.CrossRefPubMed Sijtsma K. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):107–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Novick MR, Lewis C. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika. 1967;32(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMed Novick MR, Lewis C. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika. 1967;32(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Charter RA. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes. J Gen Psychol. 2008;135(3):241–51.CrossRefPubMed Charter RA. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes. J Gen Psychol. 2008;135(3):241–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Feldt LS, Charter RA. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychol Methods. 2003;8(1):102–9.CrossRefPubMed Feldt LS, Charter RA. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychol Methods. 2003;8(1):102–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Feldt LS, Ankenmann RD. Determining sample size for a test of the equality of alpha coefficients when the number of part-tests is small. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(4):366–77.CrossRef Feldt LS, Ankenmann RD. Determining sample size for a test of the equality of alpha coefficients when the number of part-tests is small. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(4):366–77.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Feldt LS, Ankenmann RD. Appropriate sample size for comparing alpha reliabilities. Appl Psychol Meas. 1998;22(2):170–8.CrossRef Feldt LS, Ankenmann RD. Appropriate sample size for comparing alpha reliabilities. Appl Psychol Meas. 1998;22(2):170–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Padilla MA, Divers J, Newton M. Coefficient Alpha Bootstrap Confidence Interval Under Nonnormality. Appl Psychol Meas. 2012;36(5):331–48.CrossRef Padilla MA, Divers J, Newton M. Coefficient Alpha Bootstrap Confidence Interval Under Nonnormality. Appl Psychol Meas. 2012;36(5):331–48.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bonett DG, Wright TA. Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(1):3–15.CrossRef Bonett DG, Wright TA. Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(1):3–15.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. J Educ Behav Stat. 2002;27(4):335–40.CrossRef Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. J Educ Behav Stat. 2002;27(4):335–40.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha coefficients. Appl Psychol Meas. 2003;27(1):72–4.CrossRef Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha coefficients. Appl Psychol Meas. 2003;27(1):72–4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C. Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114(6):906–14.PubMed Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C. Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114(6):906–14.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1996. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1996.
20.
go back to reference Leon AC, Marzuk PM, Portera L. More reliable outcome measures can reduce sample size requirements. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(10):867–71.CrossRefPubMed Leon AC, Marzuk PM, Portera L. More reliable outcome measures can reduce sample size requirements. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(10):867–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data - A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(4):1049–60.CrossRefPubMed Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data - A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(4):1049–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items
Authors
Moonseong Heo
Namhee Kim
Myles S. Faith
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0070-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2015 Go to the issue