Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original research

Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia

Authors: Mustafa Alquraini, Emad Awad, Ra’ed Hijazi

Published in: International Journal of Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is an integral part of the Canadian emergency medicine triaging system. There is growing interest and implementation of CTAS worldwide. However, little is known about its reliability outside Canada. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability agreement of CTAS in a tertiary care emergency center in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Ten triage nurses (five senior and five junior nurses) utilized CTAS guidelines to independently assign a triage level for 160 real case-based scenarios. Quadratic weighted kappa statistics were used to measure raters’ agreements.

Results

Raters provided 1600 triage category assignments to case scenarios for analysis. Intra-rater agreement was similar for both senior and junior nurses; for senior nurses (SN1) kappa 0.871 95 % CI (0.840–0.897), and for junior nurses (SN2) kappa 0.871 95 % CI (0.839–0.898). Inter-rater agreement for the SN1 versus SN2 nurses had statistically meaningful agreement across different triage levels (weighted kappa = 0.770) 95 % CI (0.742–0.797).

Conclusions

CTAS has good reliability among emergency department (ED) triage nurses in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Saudi Arabia. The findings suggest that CTAS might be a reliable instrument when applied in countries outside Canada.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Iserson KV, Moskop JC. Triage in medicine, part I: concept, history, and types. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):275–81.PubMedCrossRef Iserson KV, Moskop JC. Triage in medicine, part I: concept, history, and types. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):275–81.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hamamoto J, Yamase H, Yamase Y. Impacts of the introduction of a triage system in Japan: a time series study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2014;22(3):153–8.PubMedCrossRef Hamamoto J, Yamase H, Yamase Y. Impacts of the introduction of a triage system in Japan: a time series study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2014;22(3):153–8.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moskop JC, Iserson KV. Triage in medicine, part II: underlying values and principles. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):282–7.PubMedCrossRef Moskop JC, Iserson KV. Triage in medicine, part II: underlying values and principles. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):282–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(50):892–8.PubMedCentralPubMed Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(50):892–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rivers EP, Katranji M, Jaehne KA, Brown S, Abou Dagher G, Cannon C, et al. Early interventions in severe sepsis and septic shock: a review of the evidence one decade later. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(6):712–24.PubMed Rivers EP, Katranji M, Jaehne KA, Brown S, Abou Dagher G, Cannon C, et al. Early interventions in severe sepsis and septic shock: a review of the evidence one decade later. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(6):712–24.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Qureshi NA. Triage systems: a review of the literature with reference to Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(6):690–8.PubMed Qureshi NA. Triage systems: a review of the literature with reference to Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(6):690–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Beveridge R, Clarke B, Janes L, Savage N, Thompson J, Dodd G. Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: implementation guidelines. CJEM. 1999;1(3 Suppl):002. Beveridge R, Clarke B, Janes L, Savage N, Thompson J, Dodd G. Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: implementation guidelines. CJEM. 1999;1(3 Suppl):002.
8.
go back to reference Murray M, Bullard M, Grafstein E. CEDIS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale implementation guidelines. CJEM. 2004;6(6):421–7.PubMed Murray M, Bullard M, Grafstein E. CEDIS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale implementation guidelines. CJEM. 2004;6(6):421–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bullard MJ, Unger B, Spence J, Grafstein E. CTAS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM. 2008;10(2):136–51.PubMed Bullard MJ, Unger B, Spence J, Grafstein E. CTAS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM. 2008;10(2):136–51.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bullard MJ, Chan T, Brayman C, Warren D, Musgrave E, Unger B. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) guidelines. CJEM. 2014;16:1–5. Bullard MJ, Chan T, Brayman C, Warren D, Musgrave E, Unger B. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) guidelines. CJEM. 2014;16:1–5.
11.
go back to reference Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores? J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):736–40.PubMedCrossRef Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores? J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):736–40.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortés EA, Garrigós JB, et al. Implementation of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) in the principality of Andorra: can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003;5(5):315–22.PubMed Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortés EA, Garrigós JB, et al. Implementation of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) in the principality of Andorra: can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003;5(5):315–22.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Elkum NB, Barrett C, Al-Omran H. Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11:3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Elkum NB, Barrett C, Al-Omran H. Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11:3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wulp I. Reliability and validity of emergency department triage systems. 2010. Wulp I. Reliability and validity of emergency department triage systems. 2010.
15.
go back to reference Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London (UK): Chapman and Hall; 1991. Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London (UK): Chapman and Hall; 1991.
16.
go back to reference Manos D, Petrie DA, Beveridge RC, Walter S, Ducharme J. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale. CJEM. 2002;4(1):16–22.PubMed Manos D, Petrie DA, Beveridge RC, Walter S, Ducharme J. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale. CJEM. 2002;4(1):16–22.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):155–9.PubMedCrossRef Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):155–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L, Audet G. Interrater agreement of Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale scores assigned by base hospital and emergency department nurses. CJEM. 2010;12(1):45–9.PubMed Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L, Audet G. Interrater agreement of Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale scores assigned by base hospital and emergency department nurses. CJEM. 2010;12(1):45–9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Fernandes CM, McLeod S, Krause J, Shah A, Jewell J, Smith B, et al. Reliability of the Canadian triage and acuity scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013;15(4):227–32.PubMed Fernandes CM, McLeod S, Krause J, Shah A, Jewell J, Smith B, et al. Reliability of the Canadian triage and acuity scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013;15(4):227–32.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Worster A, Sardo A, Eva K, Fernandes CM, Upadhye S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability: a comparison of live versus paper case scenarios. J Emerg Nurs. 2007;33(4):319–23.PubMedCrossRef Worster A, Sardo A, Eva K, Fernandes CM, Upadhye S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability: a comparison of live versus paper case scenarios. J Emerg Nurs. 2007;33(4):319–23.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia
Authors
Mustafa Alquraini
Emad Awad
Ra’ed Hijazi
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1865-1372
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0080-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue