Published in:
01-04-2011 | Editorial
Stratifying triple-negative breast cancer: which definition(s) to use?
Authors:
Barbara Adamo, Carey K Anders
Published in:
Breast Cancer Research
|
Issue 2/2011
Login to get access
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have increased rates of pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, yet have poorer prognosis compared with non-TNBC. Known as the triple-negative paradox, this highlights the need to dissect the biologic and clinical heterogeneity within TNBC. In the present issue, Keam and colleagues suggest two subgroups of TNBC exist based on the proliferation-related marker Ki-67, each with differential response and prognosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To place results into context, we review several definitions available under the TNBC umbrella that may stratify TNBC into clinically relevant subgroups.