Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Intensive Care 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Review

Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France

Authors: Jean-Pierre Graftieaux, Pierre-Edouard Bollaert, Lise Haddad, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Gérard Nitenberg, René Robert, Daniel Villers, Didier Dreyfuss

Published in: Annals of Intensive Care | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

French law allows organ donation after death due to cardiocirculatory arrest. In the Maastricht classification, type III non-heart-beating donors are those who experience cardiocirculatory arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. French authorities in charge of regulating organ donation (Agence de la Biomédecine, ABM) are considering organ collection from Maastricht type III donors. We describe a scenario for Maastricht type III organ donation that fully complies with the ethical norms governing care to dying patients. That organ donation may occur after death should have no impact on the care given to the patient and family. The dead-donor rule must be followed scrupulously: the organ retrieval procedure must neither cause nor hasten death. The decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, withdrawal modalities, and care provided to the patient and family must adhere strictly to the requirements set forth in patient-rights legislation (the 2005 Léonetti law in France) and should not be influenced in any way by the possibility of organ donation. A major ethical issue regarding the family is how best to transition from discussing treatment-withdrawal decisions to discussing possible organ retrieval for donation should the patient die rapidly after treatment withdrawal. Close cooperation between the healthcare team and the organ retrieval team is crucial to minimize the distress of family members during this transition. Modalities for implementing Maastricht type III organ donation are discussed here, including the best location for withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (operating room or intensive care unit).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Folscheid D, Wunenburger JJ: La finalité de l’action médicale. Edited by: Jean François Mattei, Folscheid D, Feuillet-Le-Mintier B, Mattei JF. PUF, Paris; 1997:139–146. Folscheid D, Wunenburger JJ: La finalité de l’action médicale. Edited by: Jean François Mattei, Folscheid D, Feuillet-Le-Mintier B, Mattei JF. PUF, Paris; 1997:139–146.
2.
go back to reference Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP: Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation Proc 1995, 27: 2893–2894. Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP: Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation Proc 1995, 27: 2893–2894.
4.
go back to reference Childress JF, Beauchamp TL: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA; 2008. Childress JF, Beauchamp TL: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA; 2008.
5.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Arias D: Discussion sur le consentement présumé ou explicite pour le don d’organes, section “le corps humain et ses elements. 2009. www.ethique.inserm.fr Rodriguez-Arias D: Discussion sur le consentement présumé ou explicite pour le don d’organes, section “le corps humain et ses elements. 2009. www.​ethique.​inserm.​fr
6.
go back to reference Ferrand E: Limitations et arrêts des traitements. Actualisation des Recommandations de la Société de Réanimation de Langue Française. Réanimation 2010,19(N 8):679–740.CrossRef Ferrand E: Limitations et arrêts des traitements. Actualisation des Recommandations de la Société de Réanimation de Langue Française. Réanimation 2010,19(N 8):679–740.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rydley S, Bonner S, Bray K, Falvey S, Mackay J, Manara A: the Intensive Care Society’s Working Group on Organ and Tissue Donation. UK guidance for non-heart-beating donation. Br J Anaesth 2005,95(5):592–595. 10.1093/bja/aei235CrossRef Rydley S, Bonner S, Bray K, Falvey S, Mackay J, Manara A: the Intensive Care Society’s Working Group on Organ and Tissue Donation. UK guidance for non-heart-beating donation. Br J Anaesth 2005,95(5):592–595. 10.1093/bja/aei235CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Renault A, Prat G, Boumédiene A, Dy L, L’Her E, Boles JM: Accueil et prise en charge des familles de patients en fin de vie en réanimation. Edited by: Boles JM, Lemaire F. Elsevier, Paris; 2004:178–184. Renault A, Prat G, Boumédiene A, Dy L, L’Her E, Boles JM: Accueil et prise en charge des familles de patients en fin de vie en réanimation. Edited by: Boles JM, Lemaire F. Elsevier, Paris; 2004:178–184.
9.
go back to reference Shemie SD, Baker AJ, Knoll G, Wall W, Rocker G, Howes D, et al.: National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada: Donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. CMAJ 2006,175(8 Suppl):S1-S24. PubMedPubMed Shemie SD, Baker AJ, Knoll G, Wall W, Rocker G, Howes D, et al.: National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada: Donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. CMAJ 2006,175(8 Suppl):S1-S24. PubMedPubMed
10.
go back to reference Siminof LA, Burant C, Younger SJ: Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes. Soc Sci Med 2004,59(issue 11):2325–2334.CrossRef Siminof LA, Burant C, Younger SJ: Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes. Soc Sci Med 2004,59(issue 11):2325–2334.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France
Authors
Jean-Pierre Graftieaux
Pierre-Edouard Bollaert
Lise Haddad
Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Gérard Nitenberg
René Robert
Daniel Villers
Didier Dreyfuss
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 2110-5820
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-23

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Annals of Intensive Care 1/2012 Go to the issue