Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Allergy 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Study protocol

The diagnosis of food allergy: protocol for a systematic review

Authors: Karla Soares-Weiser, Sukhmeet S Panesar, Tamara Rader, Yemisi Takwoingi, Thomas Werfel, Antonella Muraro, Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Graham Roberts, Aziz Sheikh

Published in: Clinical and Translational Allergy | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The literature on diagnostic tests for food allergy currently lacks clear consensus regarding the accuracy and safety of different investigative approaches. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is in the process of developing its Guideline for Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis, and this systematic review is one of seven inter-linked evidence syntheses that are being undertaken in order to provide a state-of-the-art synopsis of the current evidence base in relation to epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis and clinical management, and impact on quality of life, which will be used to inform the formulation of clinical recommendations. The aim of this systematic review will be to assess the diagnostic accuracy of tests aimed at supporting the clinical diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy.

Methods

The following databases from inception to September 30, 2012 will be searched for studies of diagnostic tests: Cochrane Library (Wiley&Sons); MEDLINE (OVID); Embase (OVID); CINAHL (Ebscohost); ISI Web of Science (Thomson Web of Knowledge); TRIP Database (web http://​www.​tripdatabase.​com); and Clinicaltrials.gov (NIH web). These database searches will be supplemented by contacting an international panel of experts. Studies evaluating APT, SPT, specific-IgE, and component specific-IgE in participants of any age with suspected food allergy will be included. The reference standard will be DBPCFC in at least 50% of the participants. Studies will be quality assessed by using the QUADAS-2 instrument. We will report summary statistics such as sensitivity, specificity, and/or likelihood ratios. We will use the hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model to summarize the accuracy of each test and to compare the accuracy of two or more tests.

Discussion

Decisions on which tests to use need to be guided by availability of tests, populations being cared for, risks, financial considerations and test properties. This review will examine papers from around the world, covering children and adults with suspected food allergy in varying populations and concentrated on four type of tests: APT, SPT, specific-IgEs, and component specific-IgEs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, Kowalski ML, Mygind N, Ring J, van Cauwenberge P, van Hage-Hamsten M, Wüthrich B, EAACI (the European Academy of Allergology and Cinical Immunology) nomenclature task force:A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy. 2001, 56 (9): 813-824. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.t01-1-00001.x.CrossRefPubMed Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, Kowalski ML, Mygind N, Ring J, van Cauwenberge P, van Hage-Hamsten M, Wüthrich B, EAACI (the European Academy of Allergology and Cinical Immunology) nomenclature task force:A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy. 2001, 56 (9): 813-824. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.t01-1-00001.x.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chafen JJ, Newberry SJ, Riedl MA, Bravata DM, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ Sundaram V, Paige NM, Towfigh A, Hulley BJ, Shekelle PG:Diagnosing and managing common food allergies: a systematic review. JAMA. 2010, 303 (18): 1848-1856. 10.1001/jama.2010.582.CrossRefPubMed Chafen JJ, Newberry SJ, Riedl MA, Bravata DM, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ Sundaram V, Paige NM, Towfigh A, Hulley BJ, Shekelle PG:Diagnosing and managing common food allergies: a systematic review. JAMA. 2010, 303 (18): 1848-1856. 10.1001/jama.2010.582.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burks AW, Tang M, Sicherer S, Muraro A, Eigenmann PA, Ebisawa M: ICON: food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012, 129 (4): 906-920. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.001.CrossRefPubMed Burks AW, Tang M, Sicherer S, Muraro A, Eigenmann PA, Ebisawa M: ICON: food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012, 129 (4): 906-920. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.001.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM, QUADAS-2 Group:QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011, 155 (8): 529-536. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.CrossRefPubMed Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM, QUADAS-2 Group:QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011, 155 (8): 529-536. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA: A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001, 20 (19): 2865-2884. 10.1002/sim.942.CrossRefPubMed Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA: A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001, 20 (19): 2865-2884. 10.1002/sim.942.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Macaskill P: Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004, 57 (9): 925-932. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.019.CrossRefPubMed Macaskill P: Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004, 57 (9): 925-932. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.019.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151 (4): 264-269. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. W264CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151 (4): 264-269. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. W264CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The diagnosis of food allergy: protocol for a systematic review
Authors
Karla Soares-Weiser
Sukhmeet S Panesar
Tamara Rader
Yemisi Takwoingi
Thomas Werfel
Antonella Muraro
Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber
Graham Roberts
Aziz Sheikh
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2045-7022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-3-18

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Clinical and Translational Allergy 1/2013 Go to the issue