Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Commentary

Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial [ISRCTN13204258]

Authors: Gillian Vernon, Zarko Alfirevic, Andrew Weeks

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Service users within the NHS are increasingly being asked to participate in clinical research. In Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, approximately 35% of women take part in research during their pregnancy. For many studies the consent process is simple; information is provided and signed consent is given. There is a difficulty, however, with obtaining informed consent from women in pregnancy who become eligible only when they develop unforeseen complications, especially when they occur acutely. The problem is compounded with women in labour who may be frightened, vulnerable, in pain, under the effect of opiate analgesia, or all of the above. If research to improve the care of these women is to continue, then special consent procedures are needed. These procedures must ensure that the woman's autonomy is protected whilst recognising that women under these circumstances vary enormously, both in their desire for information and their ability to comprehend it. This paper will discuss the obtaining of consent in this situation, and describe an information and consent pathway for intrapartum research which has been developed in collaboration with consumer groups as a way in which these issues can be tackled.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference ICH GCP Guidelines Indexed Pocketbook. Surrey, UK. 2002 ICH GCP Guidelines Indexed Pocketbook. Surrey, UK. 2002
4.
go back to reference Department of Health: Briefing Pack for Research Ethics Committees. London. 1997 Department of Health: Briefing Pack for Research Ethics Committees. London. 1997
5.
go back to reference World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki (1975, 1983, 1989,1996). BMJ. 1964, 313 (7070): 1448-1449. World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki (1975, 1983, 1989,1996). BMJ. 1964, 313 (7070): 1448-1449.
6.
go back to reference Association for Improvements in Maternity Services, the National Childbirth Trust: A Charter for Ethical Research in Maternity Care. London. 1997 Association for Improvements in Maternity Services, the National Childbirth Trust: A Charter for Ethical Research in Maternity Care. London. 1997
8.
go back to reference East CE, Colditz PB: Women's evaluations of their experience with fetal intrapartum oxygen saturation monitoring and participation in a research project. Midwifery. 1996, 12: 93-97. 10.1016/S0266-6138(96)90006-6.CrossRefPubMed East CE, Colditz PB: Women's evaluations of their experience with fetal intrapartum oxygen saturation monitoring and participation in a research project. Midwifery. 1996, 12: 93-97. 10.1016/S0266-6138(96)90006-6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Walton I: A prospective study of women's views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery. 1999, 15: 40-46. 10.1016/S0266-6138(99)90036-0.CrossRefPubMed Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Walton I: A prospective study of women's views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery. 1999, 15: 40-46. 10.1016/S0266-6138(99)90036-0.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, VanDerKerkhof E, Milne B: Informed consent for labor epidurals: what laboring women want to know. Can J Anesth. 2000, 47 (11): 1068-1073.CrossRefPubMed Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, VanDerKerkhof E, Milne B: Informed consent for labor epidurals: what laboring women want to know. Can J Anesth. 2000, 47 (11): 1068-1073.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Spencer SA, Dawson A: Implications of informed consent for obstetric research. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist. 2004, 6: 163-167. 10.1576/toag.6.3.163.26999.CrossRef Spencer SA, Dawson A: Implications of informed consent for obstetric research. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist. 2004, 6: 163-167. 10.1576/toag.6.3.163.26999.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Affleck PJ, Waisel DB, Cusick JM, Van Decar T: Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 1998, 10: 141-144. 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00258-4.CrossRefPubMed Affleck PJ, Waisel DB, Cusick JM, Van Decar T: Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 1998, 10: 141-144. 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00258-4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dorantes DM, Tait AR, Naughton NN: Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research: factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate. Anesthesia & analgesia. 2000, 91: 369-373. 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00025. Dorantes DM, Tait AR, Naughton NN: Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research: factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate. Anesthesia & analgesia. 2000, 91: 369-373. 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00025.
16.
go back to reference Baker L, Lavender T, Tincello D: Factors that influence women's decisions about whether to participate in research: an exploratory study. Birth. 2005, 32 (1): 60-66. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00346.x.CrossRefPubMed Baker L, Lavender T, Tincello D: Factors that influence women's decisions about whether to participate in research: an exploratory study. Birth. 2005, 32 (1): 60-66. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00346.x.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M: What do they know?: a content analysis of women's perceptions of trial information. BJOG. 2004, 111: 1341-1345.CrossRefPubMed Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M: What do they know?: a content analysis of women's perceptions of trial information. BJOG. 2004, 111: 1341-1345.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hearnshaw H: Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. BMJ. 2004, 328: 140-141. 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hearnshaw H: Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. BMJ. 2004, 328: 140-141. 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial [ISRCTN13204258]
Authors
Gillian Vernon
Zarko Alfirevic
Andrew Weeks
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-13

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Trials 1/2006 Go to the issue