Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research

Cost-effectiveness of postural exercise therapy versus physiotherapy in computer screen-workers with early non-specific work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD); a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Marjon D van Eijsden, Sylvia A Gerhards, Rob A de Bie, Johan L Severens

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Exercise therapies generate substantial costs in computer workers with non-specific work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD).

Aims

To study if postural exercise therapy is cost-effective compared to regular physiotherapy in screen-workers with early complaints, both from health care and societal perspective.

Methods

Prospective randomized trial including cost-effectiveness analysis; one year follow-up. Participants: Eighty-eight screen-workers with early non-specific WRULD; six drop-outs. Interventions: A ten week postural exercise program versus regular physiotherapy. Outcome measures: Effectiveness measures: Pain: visual analogous scale (VAS), self-perceived WRULD (yes/no). Functional outcome: Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand- Dutch Language Version (DASH-DLV). Quality of life outcome: EQ-5D.
Economic measures: health care costs including patient and family costs and productivity costs resulting in societal costs. Cost-effectiveness measures: health care costs and societal costs related to the effectiveness measures. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline; three, six and twelve months after baseline.

Results

At baseline both groups were comparable for baseline characteristics except scores on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and comparable for costs. No significant differences between the groups concerning effectiveness at one year follow-up were found. Effectiveness scores slightly improved over time. After one year 55% of participants were free of complaints. After one year the postural exercise group had higher mean total health care costs, but lower productivity costs compared to the physiotherapy group. Mean societal costs after one year (therefore) were in favor of postural exercise therapy [- €622; 95% CI -2087; +590)]. After one year, only self- perceived WRULD seemed to result in acceptable cost-effectiveness of the postural exercise strategy over physiotherapy; however the probability of acceptable cost-effectiveness did not exceed 60%.
Considering societal costs related to QALYs, postural exercise therapy had a probability of over 80% to be cost-effective over a wide range of cost-effectiveness ceiling ratios; however based on a marginal QALY-difference of 0.1 over a 12 month time frame.

Conclusion

Although our trial failed to find significant differences in VAS, QALYs and ICERs based on VAS and QALYs at one-year follow-up, CEACs suggest that postural exercise therapy according to Mensendieck/Cesar has a higher probability of being cost-effective compared to regular physiotherapy; however further research is required.

Trial registration

ISRCTN 15872455
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Peereboom KJ: RSI Handboek (RSI Handbook). 2005, The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Editors, 4
3.
Staal JB, de Bie RA, Hendriks EJM: Aetiology and management of work-related upper extremity disorders. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2007, 21 (1): 123-133. 10.1016/j.berh.2006.09.001.CrossRef
4.
5.
Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N: Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004, 63: 723-729. 10.1136/ard.2003.010769.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
VvOCM, Vereniging voor oefentherapie Cesar en Mensendieck (Society of exercise therapy Cesar and Mensendieck). 2005, info@vvocm.nl
7.
8.
Verhagen AP, Karels C, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Burdorf L, Feleus A, Dahaghin S, de Vet HC, Koes BW: Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, 3: CD003471-PubMed
9.
Verhagen AP, Karels C, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Feleus A, Dahaghin S, Burdorf A, Koes BW: Exercise proves effective in a systematic review of work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60 (2): e110.e1-e110.e14. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.05.006. 110.e14CrossRef
10.
Smidt N, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM, Dekker J: Effectiveness of exercise therapy: A best-evidence summary of systematic reviews. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2005, 51: 71-85.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Van Eijsden-Besseling MD, Staal JB, Van Attekum A, De Bie RA, Heuvel Van den WJA: No difference between postural exercises and strength and fitness exercises for early, non-specific, work-related upper limb disorders in visual display unit workers: a randomized trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2008, 54 (2): 95-101.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Meijer EM, Sluiter JK, Heyma A, Sadiray K, Frings-Dresen MH: Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment in sick listed patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized, controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006, 79 (8): 654-664. 10.1007/s00420-006-0098-3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Bernaards CM, Ariens GA, Hildebrandt VH: The (cost)-effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006, 7: 80-10.1186/1471-2474-7-80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Vitale MA, Vitale MG, Zivin JG, Braman JP, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL: Rotator cuff repair: an analysis of utility scores and cost-effectiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007, 16 (2): 181-7. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.013.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Jensen MP, McFarland CA: Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993, 55: 195-203. 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-I.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Van den Heuvel S: Work-related neck and upper limb symptoms. PhD Thesis. 2006, Amsterdam, TNO
17.
Van Eijsden-Besseling MD, Peeters FP, Reijnen JA, de Bie RA: Perfectionism and coping strategies as risk factors for the development of non- specific work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD). Occup Med (Lond). 2004, 54 (2): 122-127. 10.1093/occmed/kqh003.CrossRefPubMed
18.
IJmker S, Huysmans M, Blatter BM, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM: Should office workers spend fewer hours at their computer? A systematic review of the literature. J Occup Environ Med. 2007, 64: 211-222.CrossRef
19.
van Heuvelen MJ, Kempen GI, Ormel J, de Greef MH: Self-reported Physical Fitness of Older Persons: A substitute for Performance- Based Measures of Physical Fitness?. Journal of Ageing and Physical Activity. 1997, 5: 298-310.
20.
de Wolff B, Swinnen L, de Fruyt F, de Wolff C, Spielberger CD: JSS. Job stress Survey. 2002, Handleiding/Manual. Swets Test Publishers
21.
Frost RO, Marten PA: Perfectionism and evaluative threat. Cognitive Therapy Research. 1990, 14: 559-72. 10.1007/BF01173364.CrossRef
22.
Van der Ploeg HM, Defares PB, Spielberger CD: Handleiding bij de zelfbeoordelingvragenlijst ZBV. Een Nederlandse bewerking van de Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory STAI-DY. (A Dutch version of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory). 1980
23.
24.
Veehof MM, Sleegers EJA, Van Veldhoven NHMJ, Schuurman AH, Van Meeteren NLU: Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. (DASH-DLV). Journal of Hand Therapy. 2002, 15: 347-354.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Brooks R: EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996, 37: 53-72. 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien B, Stoddart Gl: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health care Programmes. 1996, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3
27.
Koopmanschap M, Burdorf A, Jacob K, Meerding WJ, Brouwer W, Severens JL: Productivity and health in economic evaluation; setting the research agenda. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005, 23: 47-54. 10.2165/00019053-200523010-00004.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH, van Ineveld BM, Van Roijen L: The friction cost method for estimating the indirect costs of disease. Journal of Health Economics. 1995, 14: 171-189. 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00044-5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH: Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002, 20 (7): 443-54. 10.2165/00019053-200220070-00002.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
32.
Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ: Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health-Econ. 1997, 6 (4): 327-40. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199707)6:4<327::AID-HEC282>3.0.CO;2-W.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M: Representing uncertainty: the role of cost- effectiveness acceptability curves. Health- Econ. 2001, 10 (8): 779-87. 10.1002/hec.635.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Sluiter JK, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MH: Criteria document for evaluation of the work-relatedness of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2001, 27 (Suppl 1): 1-102.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ: The death of cost-minimization analysis?. J Health Econ. 2001, 10: 179-184. 10.1002/hec.584.CrossRef
37.
Claxton K: The irrelevance of inference: a decision making approach to stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999, 18: 341-364. 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00039-3.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Oostenbrink JB, Maiwenn JA: The analysis of incomplete cost data due to dropout. Health Economics. 2005, 14: 763-776. 10.1002/hec.966.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness of postural exercise therapy versus physiotherapy in computer screen-workers with early non-specific work-related upper limb disorders (WRULD); a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Marjon D van Eijsden
Sylvia A Gerhards
Rob A de Bie
Johan L Severens
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-103

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Trials 1/2009 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial on risk adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple trauma patients

Letter

Response to: The BRAIN TRIAL: a randomised, placebo controlled trial of a Bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist (Anatibant) in patients with traumatic brain injury

Study protocol

Stopping randomized trials early for benefit: a protocol of the Study Of Trial Policy Of Interim Truncation-2 (STOPIT-2)

Research

Baseline hospital performance and the impact of medical emergency teams: Modelling vs. conventional subgroup analysis

Methodology

Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial

Study protocol

Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: study protocol of a randomised controlled pilot trial using a mixed methods approach