Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Behavioral and Brain Functions 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Short paper

The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages

Authors: Raphiq Ibrahim, Zohar Eviatar

Published in: Behavioral and Brain Functions | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Both reading words and text in Arabic is slower than in other languages, even among skilled native Arabic speakers Previously we have shown that the right hemisphere (RH) had difficulty in matching Arabic letters, and suggested that it cannot contribute to word recognition in Arabic. In this study we tested this finding directly.

Method

We used the Divided Visual Field (DVF) lexical decision (LD) paradigm to assess hemispheric function during reading. The experiment had two conditions (unilateral and bilateral). In the unilateral condition, the target stimulus was presented unilaterally to the left or the right visual field. In the bilateral condition two stimuli were presented simultaneously, and participants were cued as to which one was the target. Three groups of participants were tested: Arabic speakers, Hebrew speakers, and English speakers. Each group was tested in their native language.

Results

For Hebrew and English speakers, performance in both visual fields was significantly better in the unilateral than in the bilateral condition. For Arabic speakers, performance in the right visual field (RVF, where stimuli are presented directly to the left hemisphere) did not change in the two conditions. Performance in the LVF (when stimuli are presented directly to the right hemisphere) was at chance level in the bilateral condition, but not in the unilateral condition.

Conclusion

We interpret these data as supporting the hypothesis that in English and Hebrew, both hemispheres are involved in LD, whereas in Arabic, the right hemisphere is not involved in word recognition.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z, Aharon Peretz J: The characteristics of the Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing. Neuropsychology. 2002, 16 (3): 322-326.CrossRefPubMed Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z, Aharon Peretz J: The characteristics of the Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing. Neuropsychology. 2002, 16 (3): 322-326.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R: Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric Processing of nonwords: A Cross-linguistic comparison. Reading and Writing. 2004, 17: 691-705. 10.1007/s11145-004-2659-8.CrossRef Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R: Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric Processing of nonwords: A Cross-linguistic comparison. Reading and Writing. 2004, 17: 691-705. 10.1007/s11145-004-2659-8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z, Aharon-Peretz J: Meta-linguistic awareness and reading performance: A cross-language comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2007, 36 (4): 297-317. 10.1007/s10936-006-9046-3.CrossRefPubMed Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z, Aharon-Peretz J: Meta-linguistic awareness and reading performance: A cross-language comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2007, 36 (4): 297-317. 10.1007/s10936-006-9046-3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R, Ganayim D: Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology. 2004, 18 (1): 174-184.CrossRefPubMed Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R, Ganayim D: Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology. 2004, 18 (1): 174-184.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Abdulhadi S, Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z: Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research. 2011, 3 (2): 117-127. 10.1093/wsr/wsr014.CrossRef Abdulhadi S, Ibrahim R, Eviatar Z: Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research. 2011, 3 (2): 117-127. 10.1093/wsr/wsr014.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jordan TR, Paterson K: Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in visual word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia. 2009, 47: 2341-2353. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.020.CrossRefPubMed Jordan TR, Paterson K: Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in visual word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia. 2009, 47: 2341-2353. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.020.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ellis AW, Brysbaert M: Split Fovea Theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence. Neuropsychologia. 2010, 48: 353-365. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021.CrossRefPubMed Ellis AW, Brysbaert M: Split Fovea Theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence. Neuropsychologia. 2010, 48: 353-365. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Azzam R: In the linguistics of literacy, Orthography and reading of the Arabic language. Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems. Edited by: J Aaron & RM Joshi. 1989, 203-218.CrossRef Azzam R: In the linguistics of literacy, Orthography and reading of the Arabic language. Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems. Edited by: J Aaron & RM Joshi. 1989, 203-218.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Berman RA: The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Edited by: DI Slobin. 1985, Hebrew Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Berman RA: The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Edited by: DI Slobin. 1985, Hebrew Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
10.
go back to reference Abd El-Minem IM: Elm al-Sarf (Arabic grammer). 1987, Jerusalem: Al-Taufik Press (Arabic) Abd El-Minem IM: Elm al-Sarf (Arabic grammer). 1987, Jerusalem: Al-Taufik Press (Arabic)
11.
go back to reference Ibrahim R: Does visual and Auditory Word Perception have a Language-Selective Input? Evidence from Word Processing in Semitic languages. Linguistic Journal. 2008, 3 (2): 82-103. Ibrahim R: Does visual and Auditory Word Perception have a Language-Selective Input? Evidence from Word Processing in Semitic languages. Linguistic Journal. 2008, 3 (2): 82-103.
12.
go back to reference Abu-Rabia S: The role of vowels and context in reading of highly skilled native Arabic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic research. 1996, 25: 629-641. 10.1007/BF01712413.CrossRef Abu-Rabia S: The role of vowels and context in reading of highly skilled native Arabic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic research. 1996, 25: 629-641. 10.1007/BF01712413.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Frost R: Pre-lexical and post-lexical strategies in reading: Evidence from deep and shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994, 20: 116-129.PubMed Frost R: Pre-lexical and post-lexical strategies in reading: Evidence from deep and shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994, 20: 116-129.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Share DL: On the Anglo centricities of Current Reading Research and Practice: The Perils of Overreliance on an "Outlier" orthography. Psychological Bulletin. 2008, 134 (4): 584-615.CrossRefPubMed Share DL: On the Anglo centricities of Current Reading Research and Practice: The Perils of Overreliance on an "Outlier" orthography. Psychological Bulletin. 2008, 134 (4): 584-615.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shimron J: The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition. Reading and writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 1999, 11: 301-319. 10.1023/A:1008045316692.CrossRef Shimron J: The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition. Reading and writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 1999, 11: 301-319. 10.1023/A:1008045316692.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abu-Rabia S: The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2001, 14: 39-59. 10.1023/A:1008147606320.CrossRef Abu-Rabia S: The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2001, 14: 39-59. 10.1023/A:1008147606320.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Peleg O, Eviatar Z: Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: Evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language. 2008, 105 (2): 71-82. 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.004.CrossRefPubMed Peleg O, Eviatar Z: Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: Evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language. 2008, 105 (2): 71-82. 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.004.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kinsbourne M: Unity and diversity in the human brain; evidence from injury. Daedalus. 1998, 127: 233-256. Kinsbourne M: Unity and diversity in the human brain; evidence from injury. Daedalus. 1998, 127: 233-256.
19.
go back to reference Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R: Morphological structure and hemispheric functioning: The contribution of the right hemisphere to reading in different languages. Neuropsychology. 2007, 21 (4): 470-484.CrossRefPubMed Eviatar Z, Ibrahim R: Morphological structure and hemispheric functioning: The contribution of the right hemisphere to reading in different languages. Neuropsychology. 2007, 21 (4): 470-484.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Eviatar Z: Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords. Neuropsychology. 1999, 13 (4): 498-515.CrossRefPubMed Eviatar Z: Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords. Neuropsychology. 1999, 13 (4): 498-515.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Coulson S, Federmeier K, Van Petten C, Kutas M: Right hemisphere sensitivity to word and sentence level context: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2005, 31: 129-147.PubMed Coulson S, Federmeier K, Van Petten C, Kutas M: Right hemisphere sensitivity to word and sentence level context: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2005, 31: 129-147.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Boles DB: What bilateral displays do. Brain and Cognition. 1990, 12: 205-228. 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90016-H.CrossRefPubMed Boles DB: What bilateral displays do. Brain and Cognition. 1990, 12: 205-228. 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90016-H.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Iacoboni M, Zaidel E: Hemispheric independence in word recognition: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations. Brain and Language. 1996, 53: 121-140. 10.1006/brln.1996.0040.CrossRefPubMed Iacoboni M, Zaidel E: Hemispheric independence in word recognition: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations. Brain and Language. 1996, 53: 121-140. 10.1006/brln.1996.0040.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Finkbeiner M, Almeida J, Caramazza A: Letter identification processes in reading: Distractor interference reveals a left-lateralized, domain-specific mechanism. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2006, 23: 1083-1103. 10.1080/02643290600665778.CrossRefPubMed Finkbeiner M, Almeida J, Caramazza A: Letter identification processes in reading: Distractor interference reveals a left-lateralized, domain-specific mechanism. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2006, 23: 1083-1103. 10.1080/02643290600665778.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cohen L, Martinaud O, Lemer C, Lehericy S, Samson Y, Obadia M: Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres:anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cereberal Cortex. 2003, 13: 1313-1333. 10.1093/cercor/bhg079.CrossRef Cohen L, Martinaud O, Lemer C, Lehericy S, Samson Y, Obadia M: Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres:anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cereberal Cortex. 2003, 13: 1313-1333. 10.1093/cercor/bhg079.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Macmillan NA, Creelman CD: Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and --nonparametric‖ measures. Psychological Bulletin. 1990, 107: 401-413.CrossRef Macmillan NA, Creelman CD: Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and --nonparametric‖ measures. Psychological Bulletin. 1990, 107: 401-413.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Beeman MJ, Chiarello C: Complementary right and left hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1998, 7: 2-8. 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521805.CrossRef Beeman MJ, Chiarello C: Complementary right and left hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1998, 7: 2-8. 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521805.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Aghababian V, Nazir TA: Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2000, 76: 123-150. 10.1006/jecp.1999.2540.CrossRefPubMed Aghababian V, Nazir TA: Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2000, 76: 123-150. 10.1006/jecp.1999.2540.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference McCandliss BD, Cohen L, Dehaene S: The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003, 293-299. 7 McCandliss BD, Cohen L, Dehaene S: The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003, 293-299. 7
30.
go back to reference Taouk M, Coltheart M: The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2004, 17: 27-57.CrossRef Taouk M, Coltheart M: The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2004, 17: 27-57.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Coltheart M: Deep dyslexia is right-hemisphere reading. Brain and Language. 2000, 71: 299-309. 10.1006/brln.1999.2183.CrossRefPubMed Coltheart M: Deep dyslexia is right-hemisphere reading. Brain and Language. 2000, 71: 299-309. 10.1006/brln.1999.2183.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages
Authors
Raphiq Ibrahim
Zohar Eviatar
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1744-9081
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Behavioral and Brain Functions 1/2012 Go to the issue